Started By
Message
re: WAC commisioner calls out SEC officials
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:52 am to Choupique19
Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:52 am to Choupique19
quote:
“It’s nice to see the review process works.”
I can't believe Les said this

Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:53 am to CapstoneGrad06
Confident that Jarret Lee would drive us down the field? No. But we'll never know. 

Posted on 11/19/09 at 11:53 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Jarrett Lee still has to drive 65 yards for a TD. Are you confident he would do that, considering what he had looked liked in the game already. Not to mention, no Charles Scott.
heck, if it would have come down to that, I would have had less faith in our H.C. and his O. staff to make the right calls than the kid.
besides that is all over regardless ,so let sleeping dogs die and stop pounding your chest until you put the Crystal Ball away on a level playing field in front of the Whole World. And with officials from a conference that will not represent neither of the teams conference playing in the BCS game.

Posted on 11/19/09 at 1:19 pm to Choupique19
quote:
WAC commisioner calls out SEC officials
Sounds about right, since the SEC office is for the most part an apologist organization for the SEC refs.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 2:25 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Whether or not anyone thinks that Lsu could have or should have beaten alabama is not the point. The point is that Lsu was deprived of an opportunity to try to score, an opportunity that they clearly earned on the field of play but was denied them by an inept, or possibly biased official that could not see what millions of others saw. And add that to at least 4 other calls/no calls in alabamas favor, and any fair minded person has to admit that the officiating could have influenced the outcome of that game.
Posted on 11/19/09 at 3:40 pm to Tide
quote:
Maybe LSU should join the WAC.
Maybe Bama should join the WAC so you can win a conference championship. When was the last, 1992?
Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:45 pm to LooongTimeATiger
quote:
Whether or not anyone thinks that Lsu could have or should have beaten alabama is not the point. The point is that Lsu was deprived of an opportunity to try to score, an opportunity that they clearly earned on the field of play but was denied them by an inept, or possibly biased official that could not see what millions of others saw. And add that to at least 4 other calls/no calls in alabamas favor, and any fair minded person has to admit that the officiating could have influenced the outcome of that game.
Bama-LSU. Baton Rouge. 2004. Non-call in LSU's favor. We were deprived of the chance to go up two scores.
I'd say it evened out.

Posted on 11/19/09 at 5:56 pm to DB2
people on the tiger rant were throwing a fit over that "no call" but it looked like a clean hit to me. He leads with his arms, and then there facemasks hit. How is that illegal?
This post was edited on 11/19/09 at 5:57 pm
Back to top
