Started By
Message

re: Updyke evidence or proof he poisoned the trees

Posted on 4/22/11 at 1:43 am to
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86851 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 1:43 am to
100
Posted by arwicklu
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2008
7627 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 1:47 am to
quote:

Posted by Message
GoCrazyAuburn
Updyke evidence or proof he poisoned the trees
yes, the confessed, but as of now their confession would be equal to Updyke saying he poisoned the tree, but no poison has yet to be found in the trees.




Finding poison doesn't prove he did it. The only thing connecting him is a Finebaum call. He can easily say he knew about it and confessed for attention but it wasn't him. We all know he did it. We all know OJ did it. We all know Auburn did it. Concrete evidence is different though.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37533 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 1:51 am to
quote:

Finding poison doesn't prove he did it. The only thing connecting him is a Finebaum call. He can easily say he knew about it and confessed for attention but it wasn't him. We all know he did it. We all know OJ did it. We all know Auburn did it. Concrete evidence is different though.



true, there is no physical evidence that has been released that he did it, but i would bet that a lawyer has a copy of the webcam of toomer's corner from around that time and could maybe find out. Don't know that for sure though, just a possibility. However, there is enough circumstantial evidence to rule him guilty. There still isn't even circumstantial evidence towards Auburn. All there is is allegations. Thats it. You can believe whatever you want about how guilty they are, but as of now, they are just unsubstantiated claims. Updyke's claims have been supported by facts.
Posted by arwicklu
Houston, TX
Member since Jan 2008
7627 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 2:04 am to
quote:

true, there is no physical evidence that has been released that he did it, but i would bet that a lawyer has a copy of the webcam of toomer's corner from around that time and could maybe find out. Don't know that for sure though, just a possibility. However, there is enough circumstantial evidence to rule him guilty. There still isn't even circumstantial evidence towards Auburn. All there is is allegations. Thats it. You can believe whatever you want about how guilty they are, but as of now, they are just unsubstantiated claims. Updyke's claims have been supported by facts.


We're on the same page. I'm just saying his confession isn't fact because he claims it was a prank:

"Updyke apologized to his children and the University of Alabama, denying guilt but admitting he called into the radio show as "Al from Dadeville" in January to brag about the poisonings, calling it a "prank."

"It's one of the biggest mistakes I've made," he said. "My wives said I am a crowd-stirrer. I was just trying to upset the Auburn nation."

The guy did it. I have no doubt. I knew football players at another school that got free grades and money so I also believe the players. Both cases there is no true proof that is public. But I'm with you on everything you say. I'm just say.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
37533 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 2:19 am to
Yea, sorry, i didn't mean to make an argument out of this. I'm drunk.
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Finding poison doesn't prove he did it. The only thing connecting him is a Finebaum call. He can easily say he knew about it and confessed for attention but it wasn't him. We all know he did it. We all know OJ did it. We all know Auburn did it. Concrete evidence is different though.


This is NOT true, Updyke also called a professor at Auburn about the trees and Auburn has the voice mail tapes (Yes, I see the irony)... Calling Fbaum might have been to get at the Aubs, but how does he explain calling the professor.. Plus yesterday's tapes did not help him either... This will NOT go to trial, because his attorney knows that his sentence if found guilty will be MUCH HIGHER and include a lot of jail time.
Posted by PuntBamaPunt
Member since Nov 2010
10070 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 7:48 am to
wtf was his lawyer thinking letting him give that interview on fbaum yesterday? pretty much admitted to it (again).
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19255 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 8:08 am to
Yeah, they pretty much aren't ducking that he did it, just trying to get the best deal possible.
Posted by augrad00
Member since Nov 2010
1354 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 8:48 am to
if his lawyer was any good, he would have cut Mr. Updyke off before he said this...

“If they put me in (jail), it’s going to be rough. I don’t want to go to my grave being Harvey The Tree Poisoner. I’ve done a lot of good things. That wasn’t one of them. I would’ve been remembered as a great father, great grandfather.”
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:04 am to
quote:

he is admitting to a crime he comitted


This is like 30 pages late, but he didnt confess to the tree poisoning. When he said "it was the biggest mistake of my life" or something to that sort, he was referring to the radio show call. If you listen to him, he never admits to the poisoning. He is always talking about regretting making the call.

I think he did it. Not defending him at all. But that is actually what he is saying in all these interviews. And the way he talks, its like he just assumes that people know that the phone call is what he is talking about, like there is nothing else to be sorry about. It's odd, but considering who its coming from, its expected.
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:20 am to
quote:

This is like 30 pages late, but he didnt confess to the tree poisoning. When he said "it was the biggest mistake of my life" or something to that sort, he was referring to the radio show call. If you listen to him, he never admits to the poisoning. He is always talking about regretting making the call.



Exactly. Everyone is assuming he is confessing to what they believe he did, without actually listening to what he is saying.

quote:

I think he did it. Not defending him at all.


Me either...but I pay attention to what is actually being said. You can usually hear the strategy if you listen closely enough to what people and politicians say. There is always an "out" in the wording...
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 9:32 am
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54696 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:24 am to
quote:

This is like 30 pages late, but he didnt confess to the tree poisoning. When he said "it was the biggest mistake of my life" or something to that sort, he was referring to the radio show call. If you listen to him, he never admits to the poisoning. He is always talking about regretting making the call.

I think he did it. Not defending him at all. But that is actually what he is saying in all these interviews. And the way he talks, its like he just assumes that people know that the phone call is what he is talking about, like there is nothing else to be sorry about. It's odd, but considering who its coming from, its expected.
He essentially indicated that he did it, but obviously had been instructed by his attorney not to admit to guilt. Even his attorney essentially indicated that his strategy was to get the best plea deal he could and then grovel to try to get it a little better. However, technically you are correct that he didn't confess yesterday on the radio. He did acknowledge that he was the one that originally called and confessed.
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 9:26 am
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:30 am to
Yeah, he did it sure as hell, thats just not what he has said publicly so far.

quote:

WDE


I think groveling for the best deal they can get is their only hope.
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 9:31 am
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9815 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:31 am to
I know there's already like 5 pages on this subject but I justed wanted to give the OP


Posted by augrad00
Member since Nov 2010
1354 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:32 am to
In the statement below, he said he has done some good thing, but that wasn't one of them. What is the "that" he is referring to? Calling the fbaum show?


“If they put me in (jail), it’s going to be rough. I don’t want to go to my grave being Harvey The Tree Poisoner. I’ve done a lot of good things. That wasn’t one of them. I would’ve been remembered as a great father, great grandfather.”
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:34 am to
quote:

What is the "that" he is referring to? Calling the fbaum show?


Yes. Just before the section you quoted he said something to the effect of "making that CALL was the worst decision of my life. My ex-wives will tell you that I'm a first class crap-stirrer, and I was trying to get after the Auburn people..."
This post was edited on 4/22/11 at 9:36 am
Posted by auburntiger77
Glendale
Member since Dec 2010
2044 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Yes. Just before the section you quoted he said something to the effect of "making that CALL was the worst decision of my life"...


Using BAMMER Logic, since he did not deny killing the trees, he is guilty... He did not give a clear cut confession, but clearly taking the entire call, he is guilty.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54696 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:36 am to
quote:

What is the "that" he is referring to? Calling the fbaum show?
He was most likely talking about poisoning the trees, but listening to the entire context of it, he made it confusing enough and backtracked enough after his attorney interjected that he wasn't confessing, that it was not conclusively clear whether he was talking about the call or the act of poisoning. It doesn't matter, there is virtually no chance he goes to trial on the criminal mischief charge. He will accept a plea at some point.
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Yes. Just before the section you quoted he said something to the effect of "making that CALL was the worst decision of my life. My ex-wives will tell you that I'm a first class crap-stirrer, and I was trying to get after the Auburn people..."




I can confirm this statement because he STARTED to say "shite stirrer" but he stopped himself and said "crap stirrer".
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47825 posts
Posted on 4/22/11 at 9:38 am to
The fact that he called in and confessed, and in said confession he named the exact herbicide used to poison the trees is pretty convincing.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter