Started By
Message
re: Travesty for bama not to be included
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:36 pm to bfpri
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:36 pm to bfpri
quote:
Bama has the talent to win the championship .
No they don’t. Not with that halfwit fullback pretending to be a QB and that questionable defense that left Oklahoma and Vandy run up the score on them.
0
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:36 pm to bfpri
SHUT UP
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:37 pm to bfpri
quote:
lost to a couple inferior teams they get punished
exactly how it is supposed to work
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:37 pm to bfpri
quote:
Everyone knows it . But because they got lazy and lost to a couple inferior teams they get punished
That’s how this works
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:39 pm to bfpri
Beat Vanderbilt and Oklahoma next time.
It’s not like it was a close loss to Texas or UGA. You lost to two shitty SEC teams. Split those games and you’re in.
It’s not like it was a close loss to Texas or UGA. You lost to two shitty SEC teams. Split those games and you’re in.
This post was edited on 12/22/24 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:41 pm to WylieTiger
quote:
Beat Vanderbilt and Oklahoma next time
I think these kind of losses are going to become more common for all the top programs because they just aren’t going to have depth and may even have holes in their top line of the depth chart that cause mismatch problems against supposedly overmatched teams.
Oregon is undefeated but has not looked unbeatable this year. College football is going to become more like the NFL where you can beat the Chiefs one week and lose to the Browns the next.
This post was edited on 12/22/24 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:42 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's an argument of which team that shouldn't be there get to go, it's not a travesty.
Basically. What it boils down to is that there are never 12 teams who actually have a real chance at winning the championship. They should have never made it a 12 team playoff. It should have been 8 teams with conference champions always getting in and having ONLY 4 conferences and you MUST join a conference to even be considered for a spot. ND must be forced to join a conference. Period! Otherwise you end up with scenarios where conference championships no longer matter.
In all honesty. There’s never really more than maybe 6 teams that could win the championship each year.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:42 pm to wfallstiger
FAFO.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:42 pm to Diego Ricardo
That’s fine but you can’t lose both and expect top 12. I do think the SEC should have kept divisions through conference expansion.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:43 pm to bfpri
Stop it with this shite, Bama fans.
Would we have beaten SMU, Indiana or Clemson? Probably/possibly. But Bama didn’t do its job in the regular season. Even after the Vandy and UT losses, the playoffs were pretty much a guarantee. Just beat Oklahoma and Auburn. But we shite the bed in Norman.
Moving on.
Would we have beaten SMU, Indiana or Clemson? Probably/possibly. But Bama didn’t do its job in the regular season. Even after the Vandy and UT losses, the playoffs were pretty much a guarantee. Just beat Oklahoma and Auburn. But we shite the bed in Norman.
Moving on.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:45 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
I think these kind of losses are going to become more common for all the top programs because they just aren’t going to have depth and may even have holes in their top line of the depth chart that cause mismatch problems against supposedly overmatched teams. Oregon is undefeated but has not looked unbeatable this year. College football is going to become more like the NFL where you can beat the Chiefs one week and lose to the Browns the next.
I agree to an extent. Thats why I would proposed the 8 team playoff with only 4 conferences and everyone MUST be in a conference to even be considered. Your 4 conference champs get automatically in. The other 4 are chosen based by computer models.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:46 pm to WylieTiger
quote:
That’s fine but you can’t lose both and expect top 12. I do think the SEC should have kept divisions through conference expansion.
I think if they keep AQs, they should end CCGs but add a week to the regular season then divide the P4 conferences into 8 divisions that round robin to produce AQs. Probably would expand to 16 teams and end the bye week for top 4 in the process because they’ll likely have to do something like give 2 AQs to the top 2 G5 teams plus have room for more P4 at large bids plus ND.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:46 pm to bfpri
:wah: :wah: Enough with the fricking crying, go suck your fricking thumbs Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:48 pm to bfpri
I was 100% certain this was an alt troll but your post history shows that you really are this deluded.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:50 pm to bfpri
How the mighty have fallen
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:50 pm to KingOfTheWorld
quote:
Would we have beaten SMU, Indiana or Clemson? Probably/possibly.
Agree. Bama “probably” would beat them. But you can’t say with any degree of certainty based off the bad games that Bama had this year. Just a very inconsistent team. One game Bama would look damn good. The next, they looked like complete garbage. And THAT was why they didn’t get the invite and shouldn’t have. It wasn’t like Vandy and Oklahoma won on a last minute field goal after several key Bama players got injured in the game. They both dominated Bama throughout the entire game. That’s not the mark of a “championship team”.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:52 pm to bfpri
Quality melt
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:55 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
Alabama should have been in the field and could have beaten Penn State and Notre Dame. Ohio State and Texas simply have a bit more talent, more consistency, and home field advantage to boot. Alabama probably loses those games about like the opponents they actually got to play.
Nobody after about 5-6 is in the field to actually win it most seasons. Being a credible national champion threat isn’t why Alabama should have been in the field. It is the fact that they are one of the 12 best teams. They could have made the semis if they were the 11th seed this year to be honest. Might not have but that is immaterial. They didn’t expand the playoffs because they really thought the 11th best team was title caliber.
We all realize that CFB is kind of broken and there are some bad visions for its future. That said, nothing is as bleak as Alabama fan's desires for CFB. Don't play the games, just seed teams based off recruiting rankings. Pathetic.
Posted on 12/22/24 at 7:58 pm to Foy
quote:
We all realize that CFB is kind of broken and there are some bad visions for its future. That said, nothing is as bleak as Alabama fan's desires for CFB. Don't play the games, just seed teams based off recruiting rankings. Pathetic.
I think the argument Alabama should be in is performance on the field even with OU and Vandy turds considered. They were 3-1 against the top 25. They had considerable SOR/SOS advantages over those they were being compared to and a head to head over USC.
We will never prove it but I truly believe the bargain for SMU over Alabama came down to the dual concerns of killing the ACC and exposing the farce of even playing CCGs in this era.
This post was edited on 12/22/24 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 12/22/24 at 8:00 pm to bfpri
What a wonderful melt
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News