3
Started By
Message
Top 5 Quadrant Methodology for Playoffs
Posted on 11/5/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 12:05 pm to Night Vision
I like the methodology if it's used at the end of the year as supplemental information to help the CFP committee decide final rankings.
Right now a bunch of big games haven't been played, so it doesn't really show who the best teams are yet.
Right now a bunch of big games haven't been played, so it doesn't really show who the best teams are yet.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 12:07 pm to Night Vision
Quadrants are based on human rankings, therefore flawed.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 12:10 pm to Deadmanshand
exactly, we need to replace the CFB Committee with manatees
Posted on 11/5/26 at 1:24 pm to Night Vision
Quadrants are arbitrary, should be some type of sliding scale. Also, where do the quad rankings come from?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 1:27 pm to Jebadeb
Forget the committee. Split FBS into two conferences. Each conference has regional divisions. Each division champ gets an auto bid. Best for our five non-division champ records get wildcard bids. National championship pits the winner of each conference playoff against each other.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 1:32 pm to Deadmanshand
quote:
Quadrants are based on human rankings, therefore flawed.
Models are based on human parameter selection and human data organization and other things.
Everything has bias and flaws.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News