Started By
Message
There will never be North/South Divisions in the SEC ...
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:44 pm
... because no one in the South wants to be called "north" anything. It would be sacrilege, agreed? Fawk the north.
Instead, let's just do it right.
Let's either adopt NC State and Va Tech and add them to the Eastern Division while moving Mizzou to the West, or ...
Let's put Auburn in the East and Mizzou in the West and just have two permanent opponents each year during a nine conference game schedule. Bama can have Auburn and Tennessee that way - easy solution. What's the problem?
Edited due to major subject line mistake.
Instead, let's just do it right.
Let's either adopt NC State and Va Tech and add them to the Eastern Division while moving Mizzou to the West, or ...
Let's put Auburn in the East and Mizzou in the West and just have two permanent opponents each year during a nine conference game schedule. Bama can have Auburn and Tennessee that way - easy solution. What's the problem?
Edited due to major subject line mistake.
This post was edited on 12/10/12 at 9:43 pm
13
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:46 pm to scrooster
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:46 pm to scrooster
Probably b/c the South would kick the North's arse.
quote:So never play anybody opposite the divison other than the two permanent. That sucks arse.
Let's put Auburn in the East and Mizzou in the West and just have two permanent opponents each year during a nine conference game schedule. Bama can have Auburn and Tennessee that way - easy solution. What's the problem?
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:47 pm to scrooster
quote:
because no one in the South wants to be called "north" anything. It would be sacrilege, agreed? Fawk the north.
I doubt if any of the athletes care about shite like that.
ETA: I've never heard a SEC football or basketball player talk about southern pride, yankees, etc.
This post was edited on 12/10/12 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:48 pm to Rig
quote:history says otherwise
Probably b/c the South would kick the North's arse.
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:50 pm to scrooster
I thought the common belief was that 16 brought 4 team pods. Southeast, Southwest, Not So South East and Not So South West.
Cycle through the divisions every 3 years, plus a perm rival. Or go NFL and play the like placed teams from each division plus your own plus a few perms.
Cycle through the divisions every 3 years, plus a perm rival. Or go NFL and play the like placed teams from each division plus your own plus a few perms.
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:51 pm to Mizzeaux
quote:
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:51 pm to scrooster
Mizzou and Kentucky in the Border Division
A&M in the Mexican Division
Everyone else in the South Division
A&M in the Mexican Division
Everyone else in the South Division
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:51 pm to scrooster
Serious question. If UNC joins the SEC, which rivalry will be more intense, Arkansas/Mizzou or the Carolina Cat Fight?
This post was edited on 12/10/12 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:54 pm to scrooster
quote:educated English speakers on the Rant.
There will never been
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:56 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
rivalry
quote:
Arkansas/Mizzou
We'll be too busy hating teams that matter. It will be nice to play them occasionally though.
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:56 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
If UNC joins the SEC, which rivalry will be more intense, Arkansas/Mizzou or the Carolina Cat Fight?
I think UT and UNC could be a good one. I always wanted UT and UNC to play in bball while pearl was there so the coaches could wear suits in their schools colors.
Posted on 12/10/12 at 8:59 pm to scrooster
quote:
There will never been
You're referencing future and past in the same sentence.
My mind is full of frick
This post was edited on 12/10/12 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:03 pm to scrooster
Legends and Leaders 
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:41 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Serious question. If UNC joins the SEC, which rivalry will be more intense, Arkansas/Mizzou or the Carolina Cat Fight?
Just stfu about UNC joining the SEC. If you knew anything about UNC and the ACC, you would know it is not going to happen anymore than Texas is ever going to join the SEC. Does that put it into any clearer perspective for you?
From henceforth, anyone who claims UNC is coming into the SEC is an official dumbass. Go do some reading about the tobacco road crowd in the ACC before wasting time with the stupid stuff again.
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:42 pm to scrooster
quote:
Instead, let's just do it right.
Let's either adopt NC State and Va Tech and add them to the Eastern Division while moving Mizzou to the West, or ...
Let's put Auburn in the East and Mizzou in the West and just have two permanent opponents each year during a nine conference game schedule. Bama can have Auburn and Tennessee that way - easy solution. What's the problem?
or just call the divisions something else besides north and south... too tough of a solution for your little brain?
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:43 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
or just call the divisions something else besides north and south... too tough of a solution for your little brain?
Like what? I'm waiting ...
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:45 pm to scrooster
quote:
Like what? I'm waiting ...
what the frick does it matter? Don't you think that's an easier solution than finding different schools just to fit the geography of a named division?
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:47 pm to scrooster
What about East, West, Plains, Gulf? 
Posted on 12/10/12 at 9:47 pm to scrooster
Blue and Gray?
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News