Started By
Message

re: The year is 2025 and Georgia will be making it's first trip to College Station...

Posted on 7/16/22 at 6:26 am to
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 6:26 am to
quote:

Insane. In 2012 I was a freshman in high school...Time flies man.


Wow. That was 20 years after I GRADUATED hs (1992).
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 6:29 am to
& THAT doesn't create repeat games in multiple years?
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 6:35 am to
No matter when you have a rotation, SOMEBODY will complain about games set for that final year.
Posted by turnpiketiger
Lone Star State
Member since May 2020
11294 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 6:46 am to
quote:

So this is the only Florida trip to College Station that was planned by the current scheduling rotation.


If I’m not mistaken, the very first A&M conference game was Florida in college station.
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
60675 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 7:12 am to
It does boggle the mind. Are there other examples of this? (Teams not having played at another teams home field)
Posted by Go State Go State
South of the Mason Dixon Line
Member since Aug 2006
370 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 7:18 am to
quote:

This is the way the SEC has always been. It's a long SEC tradition that some schools simply play other schools infrequently.


I'll say! Mississippi State NEVER played Georgia Tech the entire time they were in the SEC. Like from 1933 to 1965.
Not Once in football.
Posted by Dawg4Life47
Beach
Member since Sep 2013
10678 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 9:39 am to
Not sure why A&M is so eager to take another L
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26005 posts
Posted on 7/16/22 at 10:04 am to
quote:

This is by far one of the shittier things about permanent division rivals



Lol

Permanent division rivals vs irrelevant artificially added teams to a conference. Mmmmmkay

Why do people assume adding teams means that you should play odd opponents more frequently? Im amazed at the lack of logic and common sense on the board.
Posted by Sooners2050
Member since Jul 2022
29 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 9:24 am to
In the NFL when the Patriots won the AFC East every year they played a first place schedule against the Steelers or the Broncos/Colts when Manning played for both franchises when the broncos/colts fell down they weren’t play them every year unless they’re entire division is scheduled against their divisions now if it happened in the SEC it would create multiple repeat games where Georgia and Alabama play every year in the regular season based on records and which team finished at the top of their division if Bama lost two games and finished second and A&M or LSU finished 1st you would likely play one of those two teams then play Bama if they get to Atlanta.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88705 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 9:27 am to
quote:

This is by far one of the shittier things about permanent division rivals



I'd say it's more a shitty thing about expanding the conference for zero reason aside form money. Prior to 2012 we played every other non-permanent opp. team from the other division home/away every 5 years. Bama in 02/03/07/08. LSu in 03/04/08/09. Arkansas in 04/05/09/10. Etc, etc. That worked perfectly fine.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 9:42 am to
Which proves that making a schedule off of the previous season's results would contribute to repeat matchups instead of playing everybody first.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 9:45 am to
That would be nice IF you had smaller conferences. The catch is...NOT MANY WANT more conferences.
Posted by Godawgs4
Member since Aug 2016
4857 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 9:50 am to
Quote

“I'll say! Mississippi State NEVER played Georgia Tech the entire time they were in the SEC. Like from 1933 to 1965.
Not Once in football.”


That was because Bobby Dodd refused to play @ State or Ole Miss because we were both located in the sticks. My Dad could not stand GT and was glad when they left the conference. And just set the record straight, they did not leave because of the scholarship situation (though they want you to believe that today).
They left because of GREED. Back in those days, the BOWL MONEY was a huge amount for the schools. However, GT did not like sharing their bowl money with the other conference schools. Hence they left to become independent, thinking they could become the Notre Dame of the South. But there is only one ND.

It was a DUMB and DUMBER decision on their part. Thus they will never be allowed back in the SEC. They left on their own and good for them as they can stay gone.
Posted by CatBBN
Member since Jan 2020
2594 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 10:44 am to
SEC scheduling makes no sense. We still haven't had A&M up to Lexington yet. Every team probably has a team that they haven't played at home in 10+ years
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88705 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 10:47 am to
quote:

That would be nice IF you had smaller conferences. The catch is...NOT MANY WANT more conferences.


every actual fan of college football wants smaller conferences. The only people that want 20+ team super leagues are the leagues themselves because they only care about money.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 11:56 am to
Yet ALL the focus is on UGA @ TA&M in pretty much any article/thread. *SMH*
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
8587 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 11:59 am to
My point was that while they want small #'s of conference members, they don't want more conferences to be created (which you would HAVE to do in downsizing others).

Ex.
"My Fb Superconference" has 20 members. They say you should only have 10. So, we break that up into "My Fb Conference A" (10 teams) & "My Fb Conference B" (10 teams).
But then they whine about the extra smaller conference.

So, they don't want Option A (superconferences) yet they also don't want Option B (increased # of smaller conferences).

Therefore, WHAT is the solution?
This post was edited on 7/20/22 at 12:11 pm
Posted by HogPharmer
Member since Jun 2022
2830 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

In the NFL when the Patriots won the AFC East every year they played a first place schedule against the Steelers or the Broncos/Colts when Manning played for both franchises when the broncos/colts fell down they weren’t play them every year unless they’re entire division is scheduled against their divisions now if it happened in the SEC it would create multiple repeat games where Georgia and Alabama play every year in the regular season based on records and which team finished at the top of their division if Bama lost two games and finished second and A&M or LSU finished 1st you would likely play one of those two teams then play Bama if they get to Atlanta.


Holy shite, how did you only use one period in this entire post?
Posted by BrotherDawg84
Member since Dec 2020
3103 posts
Posted on 7/20/22 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by multicampus
Member since Oct 2021
1191 posts
Posted on 7/21/22 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Never knew anyone from A&M felt this way as we realize scheduling is controlled by the conference office. Strange comment given the fact that a Gator loving Horn started this thread.


It's been stated on this very board. In fact, it was in a recent thread title.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter