Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:31 pm to BigBro
quote:
tipped pass
Yes another one
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:32 pm to MrWalkingMan
quote:
Intentional grounding
But a foul was called on the offense
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:36 pm to deeprig9
quote:
wish they'd expand it. If a tick tack foul is on the complete other side of the field and did not affect the play whatsoever, I think they should be be enforced on the next play from scrimmage but not take away what the previous play.
I can't tell you how many times I've seen a great play, kick return, something get completely erased because of some non-major penalty that was nowhere near the play and affected the play in zero way, many games many teams, not just my own.
It makes me sick every time.
This would be a terrible change. How can you definitely say that a held defender could have no impact on the play just because they're on the other side of the field.
An extra step or two to catch up to the returner lost because it happened too far away. Way too open to interpretation and frickery
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:36 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
But a foul was called on the offense
you could have offensive PI not called on an uncatchable ball though..
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:42 pm to Dallaswho
quote:
How can you interfere with an uncatchable pass? The defender has the same right to the ball as the receiver. How would you even know who to call it on if nobody has a shot at the ball?
So if a QB throws a pass down field and the WR is 5 yards short of catching it
Every possible foul on that play should be eliminated
He couldn’t catch the ball
So no offensive holding
No defensive holding
He couldn’t catch the ball
So no penalties
Should be called
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:43 pm to Godawgs4
Penalties should be half the distance away from the goal exactly like the penalties are assessed towards the goal line when it is half the distance.
____________________________________________________________
I had never thought of this, but I think it's actually a great idea. Take a personal foul on the 10 yard line. Against the D, it costs them 5 yards, but against the O it costs them 15. Is that fair and balanced? No!
____________________________________________________________
I had never thought of this, but I think it's actually a great idea. Take a personal foul on the 10 yard line. Against the D, it costs them 5 yards, but against the O it costs them 15. Is that fair and balanced? No!
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:47 pm to 1609tiger
quote:I wish the replays were handled at a central location away from the stadium like the SEC office (how MLB does it).
Actually if the SEC really doesn’t allow multiple replays ( in stadium) on a contested call THAT would be the stupidest rule in football.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 9:48 pm to BigBro
quote:
you could have offensive PI not called on an uncatchable ball though..
You could have offensive PI or holding
Called on an uncatchable ball
Posted on 10/14/24 at 10:05 pm to Rohan Gravy
PI is PI weather you can catythe ball or not
Holding is holding if you can catch the ball or not
Off sides is offsides wrap you can catch the ball or not
I could on and on
Why would you let an official decide if a ball was catchable
After a defender committed pass interference?
Holding is holding if you can catch the ball or not
Off sides is offsides wrap you can catch the ball or not
I could on and on
Why would you let an official decide if a ball was catchable
After a defender committed pass interference?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 10:17 pm to Rohan Gravy
Infield fly rule.
If you pop one up with a runner on base and the fielder wants to take the chance - should be his call.
If you pop one up with a runner on base and the fielder wants to take the chance - should be his call.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 11:53 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
yards short of catching it Every possible foul on that play should be eliminated He couldn’t catch the ball So no offensive holding No defensive holding He couldn’t catch the ball So no penalties Should be called
Defensive holding is still in play. Qb might have failed to make last second holding adjustment prior to release. Can’t punish the QB for that.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 12:19 am to jonnyanony
You're exactly right. Holding is holding. it would be RIDICULOUS to try to manage a game with the subjective "well, i didnt think it affected the play over there..." standard.
without the guy being held, maybe he wouldve broken free and the QB spotted him at last minute and threw the other way.
also, WRs running free draw attention from other DBs. you cant say it didnt affect a play on the other side. You really want MORE subjective opinion of ref inserted in the game???? Really?
that's just ignorance of how football works. There are RULES to how you play football- FOLLOW THEM!!
without the guy being held, maybe he wouldve broken free and the QB spotted him at last minute and threw the other way.
also, WRs running free draw attention from other DBs. you cant say it didnt affect a play on the other side. You really want MORE subjective opinion of ref inserted in the game???? Really?
that's just ignorance of how football works. There are RULES to how you play football- FOLLOW THEM!!
This post was edited on 10/15/24 at 12:23 am
Posted on 10/15/24 at 1:10 am to Rohan Gravy
Well, I will say this, I never understood who the can just pick up the flag when another rule has been broken automatically, illegal contact past 5 yards, if the supposed foul was past 5 yards of course as most overthrown passes probably would be.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 2:41 am to Rohan Gravy
There are lots of them. You must not watch much college football.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 2:45 am to jonnyanony
quote:
jonnyanony
hahaha you finally came out of hiding!
Two out of the last three
Scoreboard
Your coach about to be fired
CHOMP CHOMP motherfkker.
Enjoy the cellar!
Posted on 10/15/24 at 4:55 am to Rohan Gravy
It’s not a foul. It’s a penalty. This isn’t basketball where every whistle is a foul. We have penalties and fouls and they are not the same thing.
One is a foul against the player. One is a penalty for gaining an unfair advantage.
That’s like saying off sides in soccer is a foul. It’s not.
This is quite possibly the most uninformed post I’ve ever seen.
One is a foul against the player. One is a penalty for gaining an unfair advantage.
That’s like saying off sides in soccer is a foul. It’s not.
This is quite possibly the most uninformed post I’ve ever seen.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 5:35 am to BigSneezy
quote:
Worst is the half distance penalties near the goal for the team facing the goal line. Penalties should be half the distance away from the goal exactly like the penalties are assessed towards the goal line when it is half the distance.
This is true. But I’d settle for second penalty being equal.
If penalty on D is two yards then O penalty is 2 yards.
But if first penalty is O going in then mark the 10 or five yards back. Then a D penalty is 5 or 10 going the other way.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 6:10 am to deeprig9
If it doesn't affect the actual play, start the next first down for the other team 10 yards ahead. Simple enough.
This country sucks at thinking on its feet.
This country sucks at thinking on its feet.
Posted on 10/15/24 at 6:43 am to Rohan Gravy
I agree.
If the defense can be called for holding away from the ball; that’s all the DPI is is holding.
It’s a foul.
If the defense can be called for holding away from the ball; that’s all the DPI is is holding.
It’s a foul.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News