Started By
Message
The SEC will go to the MNC because of Tattoos
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:42 am
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:42 am
Has anyone else thought about how sad that is?
13
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:44 am to Projectpat
dafuq
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:44 am to Projectpat
You a chicken head
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:45 am to Projectpat
Post less.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:45 am to Projectpat
Can the Big 12 take aTm back? You're an awful fanbase, and this thread is a small part of the evidence supporting that statement.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
Not really. If Ohio State could have actually played in the postseason they would have dropped some games based purely on pressure.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
Tattoos don't happen, then Tressell is still there, which means no Urban, which means they're not 12-0.
Logic fail.
Logic fail.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
Meh...chain of events. Tressel would still be there and who knows what would have happened.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
quote:
Has anyone else thought about how sad that is?
More along the lines of lying about knowing of the tattoos. Then convincing the NCAA to make the players eligible for the bowl game.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
No, they will go to the BCSCG because a coach knowingly played ineligible players, and then repeatedly lied about it.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:46 am to Projectpat
And Steve Bartman catching that baseball all those years ago led to the SEC dominance.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:48 am to Projectpat
1 - Tressel would still be there instead of Meyer. Results still the same? Probably not.
2 - Ohio State would still have to play in the Big 10 championship game which they could very well lose. They aren't exactly a dominant team.
3 - Ohio State would be playing with real pressure all year instead of nothing to lose. Results still the same? Maybe not.
2 - Ohio State would still have to play in the Big 10 championship game which they could very well lose. They aren't exactly a dominant team.
3 - Ohio State would be playing with real pressure all year instead of nothing to lose. Results still the same? Maybe not.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:49 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Can the Big 12 take aTm back?
Probably, but I don't think we want to. It would be odd to turn back around so quickly.
Posted on 11/27/12 at 9:49 am to LewDawg
quote:
You a chicken head
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:00 am to Chadaristic
Not according to Brad Edwards. The Big-10 was Big East like this year.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News