re: The Mississippi Supreme Court justices that will hear the NCAA appeal

quote:

---

The NCAA meat riders here are funny. Year over year for decades the NCAA shows how inconsistent they are, somebody final smokes them on their bullshite and here comes the social media defense team.

"ThE pReCeDeNT." Oh yeah, now it matters. frick off.

---

Seems like the vast majority of the "inconsistencies" that people point out are actually the result of the courts getting involved.

At any rate, I think most sane people can agree that all of this eligibility stuff has gotten way out of hand, Pavia and Chambliss had absolute garbage cases that didn't even have a semblance of being legitimate.

quote:

---

Pavia and Chambliss had absolute garbage cases that didn't even have a semblance of being legitimate.

---

Pavia's had more legitimacy than the others when you consider the circumstances.

The NCAA gives you 5 years to play 4, whichever comes first. (Like a 5 year or 60,000 mile warranty for transmissions)

Age never played a factor, as is evident with cases like Matt Mauck and Zach von Rosenberg (who was 30 his last year on the LSU football team). Not to mention numerous others who played CFB in their 30's, 40's, even 50's. Even though they were older than the typical college football player, they were eligible because they hadn't begun their 5 years limit until later. (With limitations on which sports they were eligible to play -Mauck and Zach were not eligible for baseball).


So Pavia's argument was that he still had 1 more year of NCAA eligibility because although he had played 5 years of football at the college level, he only played 3 years of NCAA football and therefore still had one year of eligibility in the NCAA. The first two years he played in a different association.

The courts and the NCAA agreed, and they adjusted their regulations because of it. That case would never have needed to go to the courts if his team had made that argument initially.


Chambliss is different. He's only played in the NCAA system and therefore, according to the regulations, he isn't eligible because he already received 5 years to play 4.


Div 2 and 3 are still a part of the NCAA.

quote:

---

Since 95 Ole Miss football has been hit twice. Hard.

---

quote:

---

The panel noted that the case was the result of a culture at the university where rules violations were acceptable in the football program and reminiscent of similar Ole Miss infractions cases in the past.

"This is now the third case over three decades that has involved the boosters and football program," the panel stated in its decision. "Even the head coach acknowledged that upon coming to Mississippi, he was surprised by the 'craziness' of boosters trying to insert themselves into his program."

---

This doesn't even mention the head coach was the bottom bitch for Ole Miss' pimps.



Quit blaming the NCAA because your boosters don't know how to do shite without leaving a paper trail.

quote:

---

Quit blaming the NCAA because your boosters don't know how to do shite without leaving a paper trail.

---

Oh I see so if we did a better job of cheating that makes it alright then? GTFO.

quote:

---

So a lot of bluster but you don't actually have anything. Shocking

---

Yeah, I forgot you lack the ability to look shite up yourself. if it isn't pre-provided for you, you don't want to bother. Oh well.

Here, I'll help you. Look at Ole Miss 2012 violations and look at Miami's 2013 decade of violations. The ending penalties were very similar. If we'd have done what Miami did for 10 years they'd have SMU'd us.

Nah, just worn out on the hypocrisy.

quote:

---

Here, I'll help you. Look at Ole Miss 2012 violations and look at Miami's 2013 decade of violations. The ending penalties were very similar. If we'd have done what Miami did for 10 years they'd have SMU'd us.

---

Looking at the violations, it looks like Miami's issues were mostly all centered around one booster whereas Ole Miss was based on multiple boosters and multiple coaches, it was more widespread at Ole Miss.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Mississippi taxpayers should revolt