Started By
Message
That was a fumble
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:10 pm
not a TD
9
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:11 pm to Jabontik
Yeah seemed super obvious
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:12 pm to UltimaParadox
Michigan definitely got a call that the gumps would get
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:12 pm to Jabontik
Do we have to do this every single time? The call on the field was a TD. Apparently there was no angle to overturning the call definitively. Can you live with that ? Are you going to be okay?
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:13 pm to Jabontik
Clearly didn’t have possession at the plane
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:13 pm to Jabontik
We’re down a ton of players, but zebras are really getting after us in this one.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:13 pm to BigC LSU
quote:
Can you live with that ? Are you going to be okay?
I’m not sure why the LSU fan was upset enough about that to start a thread on the topic instead of commenting in the game thread…
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:13 pm to Jabontik
Probably, but there wasn't really evidence to overturn it either. shite happens, it could have gone either way.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:14 pm to prouddawg
Until you start putting technology so that the ball lights up or something when it crosses the plane when something is close like that they will always defer to the call on the field.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:14 pm to BigC LSU
Some dickheads are never okay
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:14 pm to BigC LSU
LSU defending officiating? This is the end times.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:15 pm to 3down10
quote:
there wasn't really evidence to overturn it
Other than video
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:15 pm to EastTXHorn
I’d rather get beat to sleep then be in a epic battle where the refs inject their little agenda
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:15 pm to Jabontik
The two UT alum here watching it didn’t like it but it could have gone either way and the call on the field was going to stand. shite happens.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:15 pm to 3down10
quote:
there wasn't really evidence to overturn it either.
So the fact that everyone with eyes could see him losing control of the ball before hitting they pylon isn’t evidence?
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:15 pm to Jabontik
You do not need an angle when the pylon is on the goal line - it was a fumble
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:16 pm to PBD4BAMA
quote:
So the fact that everyone with eyes could see him losing control of the ball before hitting they pylon isn’t evidence?
No, the fact that from the other angle it looked like the ball was across the line before it hit the pylon.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:17 pm to Jabontik
Not enough evidence in the replay to overturn the call.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 5:17 pm to Jabontik
Not enough evidence
If they called it a fumble, it also would've stood.
It's wild we don't have more camera angles for shite like this.
If they called it a fumble, it also would've stood.
It's wild we don't have more camera angles for shite like this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News