Started By
Message
re: Tennessee AD Dave Hart, LSU AD Joe Alleva issue statements on new schedule
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:01 pm to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:01 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
And some of y'all had the nerve to complain about us playing Alabama recently?
They're wimps. UK has always played a tough schedule. People can say a lot about UK football but it should also be said that y'all have a set of brass balls.
0
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:04 pm to BlackCloud
An expert on phonetics? Not really, but I did make it past the third grade. You'll make it eventually. Keep at it.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:06 pm to InVolNerable
Tennessee don't want to give up that annual arse whipping from RTR. 
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:07 pm to Prof
quote:LSU wins at crybaby contests, year in year out.
LSU can't beat Bama on their own. We get it.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:09 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
And some of y'all had the nerve to complain about us playing Alabama recently
I'm just saying if the goal is to protect tradition, LSU should have UK as the permanent crossover. Furthermore, if the goal is to protect tradition, the SEC doesn't add A&M or Mizzou. The goal clearly isn't about protecting tradition.
The SEC's goal is to make as much money as possible. Then 4 schools wanted to protect 'tradition" and 4 others wanted to make sure they had as easy a schedule as possible.
The SEC office is either full of idiots too stupid to see what is going on or purposefully is letting 4 schools get their way regardless of what the other 4 schools think (UF, USC, A&M, & LSU).
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:10 pm to hawgfaninc
LSU & UF = yearly rivalry opponents. So, let's REALLY look @ things.
LINK
Ala.
UF - 6 (2 SECCG)
UGA - 5 (1 SECCG)
TN - 14
Aub.
UF - 7 (1 SECCG)
UGA - 14
TN - 6 (1 SECCG)
LSU
UF - 14
UGA - 8 (3 SECCG)
TN - 8 (2 SECCG)
UF
Ala. - 6 (2 SECCG)
Aub. - 7 (1 SECCG)
LSU - 14
UGA
Ala. - 5 (1 SECCG)
Aub. - 14
LSU - 8 (3 SECCG)
TN
Ala. - 14
Aub. - 6 (1 SECCG)
LSU - 8 (2 SECCG)
Looks almost IDENTICAL to me!
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:16 pm to volfan30
quote:
Chancellor Cheek and I have strongly and consistently advocated that this rivalry be preserved regardless of any other outcomes resulting from conversations
I really think the AD and the fans of the Vols have "Stockholm syndrome" at this point. They have been beaten so bad for so long they have formed some kind of traumatic bonding with the team delivering these beatings.
Oddly enough LSU is 6-4 in the past ten years against our permanent opponent from the east. The vols are 2-8 against bama over the past decade. AMUSING.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:16 pm to Boom Angry
quote:
UT is trying to stay relevant by jumping on Bama's back. It's a sad thing to see.
/thread
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:17 pm to meldawg399
quote:
I'm just saying if the goal is to protect tradition, LSU should have UK as the permanent crossover. Furthermore, if the goal is to protect tradition, the SEC doesn't add A&M or Mizzou. The goal clearly isn't about protecting tradition.
The SEC's goal is to make as much money as possible. Then 4 schools wanted to protect 'tradition" and 4 others wanted to make sure they had as easy a schedule as possible.
The SEC office is either full of idiots too stupid to see what is going on or purposefully is letting 4 schools get their way regardless of what the other 4 schools think (UF, USC, A&M, & LSU).
slow down bro, you're making way too much sense for this crowd
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:18 pm to TigerCub
quote:
I would think Tennessee would want to stop getting their butts kicked every year
This might be hard to understand for someone that thinks cfb started in 2000, but things are cyclical.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:18 pm to southernboisb
quote:
LSU & UF = yearly rivalry opponents. So, let's REALLY look @ things.
LINK
Ala.
UF - 6 (2 SECCG)
UGA - 5 (1 SECCG)
TN - 14
Aub.
UF - 7 (1 SECCG)
UGA - 14
TN - 6 (1 SECCG)
LSU
UF - 14
UGA - 8 (3 SECCG)
TN - 8 (2 SECCG)
UF
Ala. - 6 (2 SECCG)
Aub. - 7 (1 SECCG)
LSU - 14
UGA
Ala. - 5 (1 SECCG)
Aub. - 14
LSU - 8 (3 SECCG)
TN
Ala. - 14
Aub. - 6 (1 SECCG)
LSU - 8 (2 SECCG)
Looks almost IDENTICAL to me!
Yeah I guess playing in more SEC CG since 2000 has really skewed things for us.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:19 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Since 2000
quote:
LSU Fan
there it is again. Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:19 pm to NorthGAVol
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:20 pm to NorthGAVol
Lsu football. 2000-2013.
Such a young program.
Such a young program.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:21 pm to Alahunter
Going full Gump tonight 
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:21 pm to volfan30
quote:Meh. Crap game that is irrelevant to most Bama fans of today. No one cares about it. Nothing but a boring game.
Tennessee-Alabama game
Its like the Ole Miss-LSU rivalry from decades ago. Yea, its still there, but the younguns don't care about the bad blood between the two programs.
Well, except for Scruffy. frick you Ole Miss.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:21 pm to NorthGAVol
quote:
there it is again.
Im not the one who made the chart
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:23 pm to Alahunter
quote:Damn skippy.
Lsu football. 2000-2013.
BCS era is all that matters. Anything before that don't matter none.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:24 pm to Scruffy
BCS is obsolete. It's the playoff era.
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:24 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Well, except for Scruffy.
quote:
SCRUFFY ONLY USES 3RD PERSON ON THE OT!!!!!
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News