Started By
Message
re: Talent Ranked in the SEC by Team
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:54 pm to VFL1800FPD
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:54 pm to VFL1800FPD
quote:
Okay man, if you want to say "Having that many 5 stars is utterly stupid, foolish" be my guest. Its not the correct usage.
"utterly foolish, or silly."
Now say, "having that many 5-stars is just silly". Works fine? So does the word asinine.
I'm done schooling you on the English language for the day. Move along.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 2:56 pm
1
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:55 pm to RB10
You're retarded and everyone knows it but you
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:57 pm to LSUBeaux88
quote:
And...Ole miss are the cheaters...not Bama...
It's the Bama bump, not cheating. You already know this.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:58 pm to LSUBeaux88
quote:
And...Ole miss are the cheaters...not Bama...
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:58 pm to VFL1800FPD
I don't think anyone would use that in a job interview.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 2:59 pm to thunderbird1100
fricking Richt didn't leave Kirby any talent!!
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:00 pm to TrueReb13
quote:
I don't think anyone would use that in a job interview.
RetardBoy10 would
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:04 pm to thunderbird1100
This will be Mizzou's biggest long-term issue in SEC football. Just not enough in-state talent and too difficult to pull top notch talent away from the recruiting hotbeds in the southeast. Pinkel and his staff helped us hide this deficiency for years with his ability to find undervalued guys and develop them. We had a nice little recruiting pipeline going in Texas, but I fear with the SEC move and coaching change that is slowly drying up.
For these reasons, I hope we are spending some SEC money on our basketball program, which is not so reliant on regional talent. I believe our basketball program could truly excel in the SEC, but our football program is going to be a 6-8 win team most years due to a talent ceiling.
For these reasons, I hope we are spending some SEC money on our basketball program, which is not so reliant on regional talent. I believe our basketball program could truly excel in the SEC, but our football program is going to be a 6-8 win team most years due to a talent ceiling.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:05 pm to VFL1800FPD
quote:
RetardBoy10
Do you ever get tired of getting taken to the woodshed and having to resort to responses like this? It seems to happen every time you try and contradict someone.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:05 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
18 5-stars
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:07 pm to RB10
RB10 that's an asinine statement
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:09 pm to tiger perry
UGA's problem has been systemic. Automatic suspensions over trivial shitte, drug tests after spring break, the handling of Todd Gurley versus how Manzels issue was handled.
Seeing alot of those issue quietly go away under Kirby.
Lardarse may be alright in year two as OC, but heck, Spurrier would be an awesome piece to the puzzle if Chaney does not work out.
Seeing alot of those issue quietly go away under Kirby.
Lardarse may be alright in year two as OC, but heck, Spurrier would be an awesome piece to the puzzle if Chaney does not work out.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:09 pm to ChopBlockOclock
quote:
I think Kirby with Chaney is a massive failure and will only continue this trend of a huge talent waste
Evidence?
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:09 pm to Kcoyote
Auburn with the lowest amount on Scholly
68??? W T F
68??? W T F
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:10 pm to VFL1800FPD
quote:
RB10 that's an asinine statement
Sure it is. Just like you claiming the word asinine doesn't work when the fan of an opposing team is using it to describe the 18 5-stars on Alabama's roster.
That's a terribly uninformed opinion, and you got slapped down for trying to push it. Move along.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:11 pm to ChopBlockOclock
quote:
I hope Kirby with Chaney is a massive failure and will only continue this trend of a huge talent waste.
FIFY
UGA's numbers weren't so impressive the last couple years. Kirby has flipped the worst part of the roster (2013 class) for the most talented (2017). We'll see how it works out.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:11 pm to thunderbird1100
Lots missing to be able to translate this onto the field. I did similar and found that results correlation to higher recruit ranking was not very accurate. This is why Navy beats Notre Dame, etc. Why?
(1) Ranking by recruit does not indicate a complete team... i.e. no serviceable QB negates a bunch of 5-stars.
(2) Stars are given for the ability of a player to help the team when he comes out of HS. It says nothing about development, age, etc. Many highly ranked HS players have already peaked and have little upside due to advanced maturity.
(3) Coaching...
(4) Scheme
(5) The extraordinary athlete equation
But this is some interesting work. Thanks
(1) Ranking by recruit does not indicate a complete team... i.e. no serviceable QB negates a bunch of 5-stars.
(2) Stars are given for the ability of a player to help the team when he comes out of HS. It says nothing about development, age, etc. Many highly ranked HS players have already peaked and have little upside due to advanced maturity.
(3) Coaching...
(4) Scheme
(5) The extraordinary athlete equation
But this is some interesting work. Thanks
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:14 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Talent Ranked in the SEC by Team, per 247
FIFY
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:15 pm to RB10
Its funny you think youre right. No one would say "having that many 5 stars is asinine." Youre butchering it. Daniel Webster is turning in his grave. I am done.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 3:17 pm to VFL1800FPD
quote:
No one would say "having that many 5 stars is asinine."
Every non-Alabama fan should be saying this.
quote:
I am done.
You've been done.
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News