Started By
Message
Sporting News-Best of the BCS: Top 10 teams
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:21 pm
10. 2005 Texas
9. 2006 Florida
8. 2000 OU
7. 2003 LSU
6. 2003 USC (didn't win the crystal ball)
5. 2009 Alabama
4. 1999 Florida State
3. 2008 Florida
2. 2004 USC
1. 2001 Miami
LINK
9. 2006 Florida
8. 2000 OU
7. 2003 LSU
6. 2003 USC (didn't win the crystal ball)
5. 2009 Alabama
4. 1999 Florida State
3. 2008 Florida
2. 2004 USC
1. 2001 Miami
LINK
12
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:22 pm to jatebe
at sporting news
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:24 pm to jatebe
quote:
10. 2005 Texas
9. 2006 Florida
8. 2000 OU
7. 2003 LSU
6. 2003 USC (didn't win the crystal ball)
5. 2009 Alabama
4. 1999 Florida State
3. 2008 Florida
2. 2004 USC
1. 2001 Miami
They probably should have waited..
1a. 2001 Miami
1b. 2011 LSU
3. 2008 Florida
4. 1999 Florida St
..etc
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:26 pm to heartbreakTiger
Oh yeah there is any reason at all the think 2003 USC was better than 2003 LSU.
Not lIke the SEC hasn't proven its extreme dominance or anything. Maybe that should be taken into completely arbitrary hindsight.
Not lIke the SEC hasn't proven its extreme dominance or anything. Maybe that should be taken into completely arbitrary hindsight.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:43 pm to jatebe
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:45 pm to SammyTiger
They disrespected AU, but to me putting a team LSU beat ahead of them is the greater disrespect.
quote:
7. 2003 LSU
6. 2003 USC (didn't win the crystal ball)
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:48 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Oh yeah there is any reason at all the think 2003 USC was better than 2003 LSU.
Based on their performance in the years after that 2003 team I would think that USC had more talent on its roster than the LSU team did.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:50 pm to jatebe
quote:
Sporting News
Found your problem.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:53 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Based on their performance in the years after that 2003 team I would think that USC had more talent on its roster than the LSU team did.
By this logic, LSU's 2010 team was better than Auburn's 2010 team.
See how that works?
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:55 pm to jatebe
2004 Auburn was better than some of those teams.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:57 pm to SammyTiger
Really surprised they put '03 USC and not '04 Auburn on the list. I understand that '10 Auburn would be arguable but that list is full of very good teams.
If LSU puts down Bama in a couple weeks, I would certainly say they are a top 3 team, only Jefferson/Lee at quarterback keeps them from being argued as the best.
If LSU puts down Bama in a couple weeks, I would certainly say they are a top 3 team, only Jefferson/Lee at quarterback keeps them from being argued as the best.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 12:59 pm to jatebe
I don't keep up with Sporting News (i only read Phil Steele) so I'm not really in the know about this type of stuff, but what is bad about their opinion?
Posted on 12/27/11 at 1:28 pm to jatebe
Noone won the BCS in 04 so Sporting News needs to do more research and try again.
BTW, having 03 USC even mentioned in this list is a joke. This is suppose to be a list of BCS champions I thought.
BTW, having 03 USC even mentioned in this list is a joke. This is suppose to be a list of BCS champions I thought.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 1:50 pm to rolltide1283
quote:
BTW, having 03 USC even mentioned in this list is a joke. This is suppose to be a list of BCS champions I thought.
They don't say it's the champions of the BCS, just the best teams of the BCS era.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 2:18 pm to jatebe
quote:
They don't say it's the champions of the BCS, just the best teams of the BCS era.
oh, then without a doubt, LSU 2011 should already be on the list at #1. win or lose on jan 9th, won't change that.
i'd probably put this 2011 alabama team at #5 fwiw
This post was edited on 12/27/11 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 12/27/11 at 2:22 pm to jatebe
quote:
2. 2004 USC
quote:
10. 2005 Texas
so the texas beats essentially the same team as the 04 trojans and is last on this list?
Posted on 12/27/11 at 2:23 pm to jatebe
Not only did they leave off 2 undefeated Auburn teams, but they put 2006 UF in there
Posted on 12/27/11 at 2:27 pm to Swoopin
quote:
Not only did they leave off 2 undefeated Auburn teams, but they put 2006 UF in there
i know wtf
2010 Auburn should be on there without a doubt. As a team, not as strong as most on the list.. but in a one game winner take all.. I'm not sure Cam and Fairley could be beat
Posted on 12/27/11 at 4:28 pm to Swoopin
quote:
Not only did they leave off 2 undefeated Auburn teams, but they put 2006 UF in there
That was the first thing that struck me when I saw the list. Our shitty 2006 team beat one of the best teams in the last decade?
Posted on 12/27/11 at 4:29 pm to plazadweller
Yet, neither of our undefeated teams made the cut.
It's whatever.
It's whatever.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News