Started By
Message
re: Spinoff Thread: Why not UAB?
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:48 pm to bigpapamac
Posted on 5/9/13 at 2:48 pm to bigpapamac
UAB is a terrible idea on many levels, as mentioned by everyone...
Truthfully, after going down the list of candidates that we want but can't get (OU, Virginia Tech, North Carolina, ANY ACC Schools)...
...we should look at adding East Carolina, West Virginia, and moving Mizzou to the West
Truthfully, after going down the list of candidates that we want but can't get (OU, Virginia Tech, North Carolina, ANY ACC Schools)...
...we should look at adding East Carolina, West Virginia, and moving Mizzou to the West
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:12 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
UAT's BOT is blocking them without a vote because they have no legit reason to stop them.
Why do you keep calling it the UAT Board? It's the UA system, which governs all 3 campuses. If UAB is in fact completely independent of UAT, then why do you keep accusing UAT of blocking UAB's program? If UAB was independent, it could do what it wanted regardless of what UAT wants.
Also why do you care so much about UAB as an Auburn fan? Did you go to UAB or something? You need to focus more on the injustice perpetrated by AUA on the AUM athletic program. Hell, AUM does not even have a football team because the AUA board only cares about AUA football. Just using your logic buddy.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:16 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
gumps
quote:
gump
quote:
bammer
We get it man. You don't like Alabama.
quote:
Anyway, enough of that for me for now. Have work to do.
Sure you do......says the guy posting on a sports forum at 10AM about UAB football.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:20 pm to Monticello
quote:TiM won't address the AUA/AUM questions. He hasn't even made one post about the current "committee" that was brought in to evaluate AUA's Athletic Department, or the AD that a large portion of the AU fanbase wants kicked to the curb.
Why do you keep calling it the UAT Board? It's the UA system, which governs all 3 campuses. If UAB is in fact completely independent of UAT, then why do you keep accusing UAT of blocking UAB's program? If UAB was independent, it could do what it wanted regardless of what UAT wants.
Also why do you care so much about UAB as an Auburn fan? Did you go to UAB or something? You need to focus more on the injustice perpetrated by AUA on the AUM athletic program. Hell, AUM does not even have a football team because the AUA board only cares about AUA football. Just using your logic buddy.
But he is ready, willing, and armed to jump up and defend UAB and point out the injustice done to the UAB football team by UAT BOT & Paul Bryant, Jr.

TiM's armed with tons of [links] if needed.

This post was edited on 5/9/13 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:26 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Most schools only pay a very small portion of the coaches salary. for example, I believe Bama only actualy pays saban around 200-300k, the rest is from private sponsorship.
Agreed, but common sense will tell any logical board member that there will always be hundreds of big time Bama boosters who will hold up their end of the deal to pay a salary. Also it is diversified among a lot of boosters so any one unhappy booster can't fire a Bama coach by threatening to pull funding. And even if all the boosters got together and decided to pull funding at the same time for a coaches salary, the UA athletic department is so large and profitable that it could cover the cost on its own.
UAB was in an entirely different situation where a few rich boosters were willing to help pay for a new coach. It would place the power to fire a university employee essentially in the hands of one or two donors, which can get a university in a ton of trouble with accreditation. But I guess you Auburn fans already know that........

Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:30 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
In 2004, Mike Anderson, the bball coach had a total compensation package of up to $775,000 which the UAT BOT signed off on.
Yea because it was a very successful and profitable basketball program.
This whole idea that Alabama football is scared of UAB's football team is ludicrous. And it is making you look stupid for continuing to repeat this as justification for UAB having a shitty football team.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:39 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Bama fears competition from UAB. Bama knows UAB will never be an equal or true rival, but Bryant Jr and the BOT do not want to take any chances or give UAB a chance to build a respectable program.
Name me one high profile prospect Alabama has ever lost to UAB, Troy, or South Alabama. Give me any inkling of any reason why anyone associated with Alabama football would fear UAB being a consistent 8-4 CUSA team. Troy is the premier program in the Sun Belt and it has not put the slightest smudge on Alabama's ability to recruit. Why would a successful UAB football program threaten Alabama football? Just give me something so I can play along in this fallacy of an argument you have created.
UAB basketball has arguably been the best basketball program in the State of Alabama over the last 20 years and Alabama did nothing to prevent that growth. UA had an actual reason to fear UAB basketball and it did not impede UAB in hiring Gene Bartow, Mike Anderson, or Mike Davis? And its not like UA does not care about basketball. We spend 2 million a year on our head coach and just spent millions renovating the coliseum.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:43 pm to Monticello
quote:TiM's got a agenda he's desperately trying to push. It's all anti-Bama, anti-UA BOT, anti-Paul Bryant, Jr.
Monticello
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:47 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:WTF?
I was done with this subject until more gumps decided to chime in with some BS that needed correcting.
Again.
And honestly it does get annoying having to combat gump stupidity sometimes. It is like never-ending and stuff it seems.
Anyway, enough of that for me for now. Have work to do.
He's an AU fan living in Miami and ^^this^^ is how he spends his time?
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:54 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Saying or implying UAT and UAB have much of anything in common or related is simply not accurate. They are seperate independent institutions.
Great. So if they are so separate then why do you keep accusing UAT of preventing UAB from having a successful football team? If there is no major connection then UAT would have no ability to stop the growth of UAB's football program.
Paul Bryant Jr is not the only voting member of that board.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:56 pm to RT1941
Yea tons of work to do and meetings to attend, but he has stayed on this message board from about 9 AM to 4PM today to make sure we all know how evil Alabama and all the "gumps" and "bammers" are at "UAT."
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:57 pm to TigerJames
quote:
UAB is a top tier academic school
top tier Medical school*
anything else is pretty much subpar.
quote:
with a huge student population.
compared to what? They have a smaller student body than most SEC schools.
quote:
It is in a vibrant city
Birmingham is a vibrant city?

quote:
and the SEC is headquartered there
Irrelevant.
quote:
Maybe it could dilute Alabama's influence in the league offices.
...no, just no. This post just absolutely blows.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 4:59 pm to Ross
My response on page 2 is eerily similar to yours



Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:20 pm to Monticello
quote:
Yea tons of work to do and meetings to attend, but he has stayed on this message board from about 9 AM to 4PM today to make sure we all know how evil Alabama and all the "gumps" and "bammers" are at "UAT."
Yep. In between doing work.
Your posts are too dumb to respond individually too, so I will just hit the high points.
1. You claim one person cannot unduly influence a BOT. This is laughable. Bryant Jr has many a time. Just like Bobby Lowder did on AU's.
2. I already explained the dynamic between UAT and UAB. It is a legal fact UAB is an independent university from UAT in every way EXCEPT a BOT that oversees both schools. The BOT is mostly comprised of "UAT people". This is not a difficult concept and I already provided a perfect analogy between the Alabama board of education and the independently operating systems within the same state.
3. If not to prevent UAB from fielding a stronger football team, why prevent them from getting a good coach or building their own stadium. Fisher would have MORE than paid for himself (the measly $200k in additional salary) in half a season. And that $200k was going to be picked up by UAB boosters anyway. They had already raised the cash. The new stadium would have cost the "UA system" exactly $0.00. So explain that one.
All the facts and actions of the UAT BOT are against you.
Your attempt at an arguement is weak, distorted, and full of fallacies.
Thanks for playing.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:22 pm to RT1941
quote:
TiM's got a agenda he's desperately trying to push
Yeah, my agenda is to point out how fricking stupid some of you clowns are.
A noble cause but an uphill battle considering the depth and breadth of stupidity being confronted at present.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 5:31 pm to Ross
quote:Their Biology and specifically their Microbiology programs are pretty damn good.
top tier Medical school*
anything else is pretty much subpar.
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:03 pm to TigerJames
Only if we can add La Tech. They could be Arkansas natural rival
Posted on 5/9/13 at 6:45 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Your attempt at an arguement is weak, distorted, and full of fallacies.
So just to summarize, you contend that the University of Alabama, winners of 3 of the last 4 national titles, is concerned that any success by the UAB football program will diminish its status, and is therefore engaged in an active conspiracy to destroy the UAB football program.
I deny the accusation.
I will allow others to decide whose argument is "weak, distorted, and full of fallacies."
Posted on 5/9/13 at 7:09 pm to Monticello
quote:
So just to summarize, you contend that the University of Alabama, winners of 3 of the last 4 national titles, is concerned that any success by the UAB football program will diminish its status, and is therefore engaged in an active conspiracy to destroy the UAB football program.
I contend they were concerned about the effect a significantly stronger UAB football program would have on bama's program at the time the decisions were made in 2005 (sullivan), 2006 (Fisher).
I think that is EXTREMELY obvious. It is also the same conclusion many unbiased third parties (some that I linked) came to as well. Additionally, whether you like it or not, it is the same conclusion many reasonable gumps agreed with at the time. I found an article yesterday from the capstone report (from that time period, 2006) saying as much. There are multiple blog posts I found googling from the capstone report that were anti-uab football as well. In addition, bama's beat writer for the Bham news (Jon Soloman) speculated the same.
You need to just face facts gump and quit with the BS retard spin.
quote:
I deny the accusation.
I will allow others to decide whose argument is "weak, distorted, and full of fallacies."
That is cool. I am confident 95%+ of people that have no dog in the fight can come to the same conclusions I have.
Have a good one.
This post was edited on 5/9/13 at 7:11 pm
Back to top
