Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

So what consequences could actually happen? Also bonus Q.

Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:11 pm
Posted by Craig86
Florida
Member since Oct 2012
2107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:11 pm
So I haven't really been following this that closely and I know there's a lot of trolling going on from both sides.

But I am interested in what consequences if any could actually come up this.

Are we talking it just makes LSU not play the players, fines, suspensions, scholarship reductions, or are these not on the table at all? I don't know how all of this works so is it just a money thing or is it a player eligibility thing like what honestly could come of this realistically speaking, is it truly nothing at all will come of it or something could actually come of it?

Also Austin Simmons went 17 of 19, 254 yards, and four passing touchdowns last night in Missouri's game against Arkansas pine bluff.

Now say what you will about the opponent, does anyone here think that they're starting quarterback will have a game this year with similar or better statistics than that and if so against who?
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
35829 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:12 pm to
They can be kicked out which I advocate for.


PUT EM OUT!!!!


Posted by Tarpon08
Cut Off, LA
Member since Dec 2014
9186 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:14 pm to
Most likely scenario is LSU doesn’t play them and has to compensate the kids. Then it all goes away.
Posted by LSU4Life2021
In the dump known as Mississippi
Member since Dec 2021
1249 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:21 pm to
The SEC is really going to cut a founding member with 4 legitimate NCs (three since 2003) and a massive media draw? :rotflmao:
Posted by supersaints9
Colleyville,Tx
Member since Dec 2009
20094 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

PUT EM OUT!!!!


The only thing “ putting out” is your mouth for meth
Posted by Insurancerebel
Madison
Member since Aug 2021
3188 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Most likely scenario is LSU doesn’t play them and has to compensate the kids. Then it all goes away.

Hearing the SEC is going to make it come out of next years rev share, they are after blood.
Posted by Hurricane2020
Member since Apr 2020
3227 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:07 pm to
The TRO + preliminary injunction are in place to prevent any punishment to the parties.

A judge says, "Yes, you can play these players now without fear of punishment from the SEC. Because if you waited for a final judgement after the full court case to go through, the window of eligibility would have lapsed for these players and it would cause irreparable harm to the players financially and the school's ability to field a better roster for the 2026 season which would result in financial damages to the school. The harm towards the SEC from these players playing is less than that to the players not playing. In addition to that, any financial damages to the SEC could be paid at a later date if damages are found. Therefore there is no irreparable harm to the SEC caused by temporarily allowing these players to play until a final judgement is made at a later date. Also, it is unfair to LSU to be punished while following this courts preliminary injunction, since any punishment would cause irreparable harm to the university."

Something like that.
Posted by Insurancerebel
Madison
Member since Aug 2021
3188 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 4:21 pm to
That's going to get Trumped in Federal court.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter