Craig86
| Favorite team: | Ole Miss  |
| Location: | Florida |
| Biography: | NA |
| Interests: | Football, politics, criminal justice. |
| Occupation: | NA |
| Number of Posts: | 2167 |
| Registered on: | 10/25/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Game # off week
Posted by Craig86 on 9/27/26 at 6:00 am to Henry Jones Jr
I'm not trying to blame the players and I'm not trying to blame the coach, honestly I don't really know where the issue lies.
But I will say, and I saw a poster mention it yesterday, if Louisville had a better quarterback they could have easily won that game, if LSU had a better quarterback we could have easily lost that game, we played a team with a great running back and a better quarterback and we easily lost the game.
And you don't need to be a world leader you just got a hit you're open receivers because they're going to be open with this secondary every now and then.
Any team that has a decent quarterback is going to be putting up points on us. Are D line doesn't get pressure enough, we're not forcing interceptions or fumbles, we could be looking at four losses.
State, UGA, FL, I wouldn't even count out Auburn at this point due to the fact that they put up 40 points on the Gators. Not to mention Missouri with Austin Simmons, all of these could end up being high scoring affairs.
But I will say, and I saw a poster mention it yesterday, if Louisville had a better quarterback they could have easily won that game, if LSU had a better quarterback we could have easily lost that game, we played a team with a great running back and a better quarterback and we easily lost the game.
And you don't need to be a world leader you just got a hit you're open receivers because they're going to be open with this secondary every now and then.
Any team that has a decent quarterback is going to be putting up points on us. Are D line doesn't get pressure enough, we're not forcing interceptions or fumbles, we could be looking at four losses.
State, UGA, FL, I wouldn't even count out Auburn at this point due to the fact that they put up 40 points on the Gators. Not to mention Missouri with Austin Simmons, all of these could end up being high scoring affairs.
2
re: At What Point Will You Admit You Were Wrong About Pete Golding?
Posted by Craig86 on 9/23/26 at 1:13 pm to theliontamer
LSU wanted to lose! They spent 40 million to lose, wait until year 3!!
re: Georgia fans- you worried about OU?
Posted by Craig86 on 9/22/26 at 11:54 am to dallastiger55
Dude Oklahoma literally looks terrible, of course that means ole miss will probably lose to them...
Now every now and then Georgia has a let down game we all have seen them before, but I just feel like George is going to whoop them by like 30 points or more.
Now every now and then Georgia has a let down game we all have seen them before, but I just feel like George is going to whoop them by like 30 points or more.
Dude stop hiding behind first year, it's the portal, it's nil, there is no first year, second year, third year, every year is the year now, when you're dropping 50 million dollars on a class you're plugging all the holes, sometimes you get what you pay for sometimes you don't. It's not an improvement from one year to the next it's whatever percentage you get from it sometimes you get 76% sometimes you get 94%, sometimes you get 47%, every year is a new year one and done.
Depending on how this year goes I think we'd probably win 8 to 10 games next year as well, Deuce Knight looks to be a very serviceable quarterback.
Running backs that we have outside of Lacey seem very good, wide receiver doesn't seem like it's going to be a problem. I'm not worried about the D line under Golding. On paper the offensive line was going to be our weakest area but they look like they're pretty decent so far, secondary is a concern but that's always going to be a hit or miss in recruiting and hopefully they can improve.
I think we'll probably be fine next year maybe a slight drop off but not by much.
Running backs that we have outside of Lacey seem very good, wide receiver doesn't seem like it's going to be a problem. I'm not worried about the D line under Golding. On paper the offensive line was going to be our weakest area but they look like they're pretty decent so far, secondary is a concern but that's always going to be a hit or miss in recruiting and hopefully they can improve.
I think we'll probably be fine next year maybe a slight drop off but not by much.
So I found out why you wouldn't want to play Man all the time.
Defeating Rubs and Picks: Modern offenses use compressed and bunch formations to intentionally block man-to-man defenders. Zone avoids the clutter because defenders pass receivers off to the next zone instead of chasing them through a maze
At least that was one reason AI said
Defeating Rubs and Picks: Modern offenses use compressed and bunch formations to intentionally block man-to-man defenders. Zone avoids the clutter because defenders pass receivers off to the next zone instead of chasing them through a maze
At least that was one reason AI said
You said the same s*** after the playoffs just wait until he has to coach his own team... NEXT!
So can't every other team that Ole Miss play just follow the exact script that you did in the third quarter if they want to stop Chambliss? I'm assuming there are enough plays in a defensive coordinator's playbook to blitz and disguise blitzes and just play Man the whole game instead of zone?
I would assume man is always the better defensive scheme as long as you have the athletes to support it, I feel like zone is used almost like a crutch to cover up athletic deficiencies but I'm sure that's a very simplistic way of looking at it.
I would assume man is always the better defensive scheme as long as you have the athletes to support it, I feel like zone is used almost like a crutch to cover up athletic deficiencies but I'm sure that's a very simplistic way of looking at it.
LSU 3rd quarter
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:45 pm
Someone who's actually played football or maybe coached it, explain to me what LSU did differently in the third quarter on defense compared to the first half and even somewhat of the fourth quarter.
It looked like they blitched more but I haven't watched enough replay to see if they were blitzing safeties or if it was delayed blitz or what they were doing.
Obviously it seemed to work I assume they were playing in man at that point instead of zone?
What are the dangers of playing that way, I'm assuming they would be if you don't get to the quarterback then you have less coverage but why doesn't every team play like LSU did in the third quarter and why did LSU seemingly go away from it? I would say most of the SEC probably has the athletes to get to the quarterback maybe if they blitz like that, has there ever been a team in college or pro that blitzed in some way shape or form like 75% of the time or is that just not a thing because it would just be too easy to counteract?
It looked like they blitched more but I haven't watched enough replay to see if they were blitzing safeties or if it was delayed blitz or what they were doing.
Obviously it seemed to work I assume they were playing in man at that point instead of zone?
What are the dangers of playing that way, I'm assuming they would be if you don't get to the quarterback then you have less coverage but why doesn't every team play like LSU did in the third quarter and why did LSU seemingly go away from it? I would say most of the SEC probably has the athletes to get to the quarterback maybe if they blitz like that, has there ever been a team in college or pro that blitzed in some way shape or form like 75% of the time or is that just not a thing because it would just be too easy to counteract?
How much has changed from Florida's defense last year because we only beat them by a touchdown, and that was at our place so I assume they have gotten much better at least at the quarterback position I think the running back was there last year as well.
I'm just saying this if LSU had a better quarterback and I'm not saying that the guy can't be it but you guys still have a good team I just think the way Ole Miss was pumped up and everything and with the quarterback we have it was going to be tough.
re: How Bad is Auburn’s Offensive Line?
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:38 pm to GatorBait24
Still those are a lot of sacks.
My favorite cope is just wait till chambliss is gone and then you guys will be bad, they didn't watch any Deuce Knight footage.
re: Rebuilds no longer exist.
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:31 pm to sorantable
I literally just posted the same thing the other day but I wasn't specifically talking about LSU.
re: Where are the AI receipts from all the LSU fans saying they'd win by 20+ etc
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:29 pm to TutHillTiger
I am worried about Florida honestly if I was a betting man I would say Florida wins by 10 or 14 which I hate to say but they're not bad and I think you guys could have won that game because you had receivers open so I'm definitely worried about it.
re: Ole Miss at Florida - Keys to the game
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:27 pm to generalgator87
Our offensive line actually played really well against LSU but I just worried that if they blitz a lot then they're going to get to Chambliss, much like LSU in the third quarter.
Our secondary left people wide open in the LSU game and if they had a quarterback who could throw they would have won.
If your quarterback is decent and your wide receivers are as good as you say then I think it could be a long day for the rebels I hate to say it.
Our secondary left people wide open in the LSU game and if they had a quarterback who could throw they would have won.
If your quarterback is decent and your wide receivers are as good as you say then I think it could be a long day for the rebels I hate to say it.
Where are the AI receipts from all the LSU fans saying they'd win by 20+ etc
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 1:25 pm
I know some of you have come out and ate your Crow which is fine, and a lot of the fans have actually been cordial which is great.
I'm talking about the people that were beating their chest, there's no way Ole Miss scores 21 points on this defense, they almost lost a Louisville there's no way that they can beat us, etc, etc.
Every year is going to be a battle for you, you're not going to build up to your three, you're not going to be better 4 years from now, next year you could win less next year you could win more and that's just the way it is but there's no more building a team on multiple years you spent money and I didn't work out. Next!
I'm talking about the people that were beating their chest, there's no way Ole Miss scores 21 points on this defense, they almost lost a Louisville there's no way that they can beat us, etc, etc.
Every year is going to be a battle for you, you're not going to build up to your three, you're not going to be better 4 years from now, next year you could win less next year you could win more and that's just the way it is but there's no more building a team on multiple years you spent money and I didn't work out. Next!
re: How much do you buy, or not buy Florida as a 3.5 pt favorite at home vs Ole Miss
Posted by Craig86 on 9/21/26 at 11:12 am to MorningWoodAcademy1
Ole Miss could easily lose this game. None of us can pretend Florida does not have talent, they have a hungry new coach, they looked good against Auburn, they play fast, can you have to understand our secondary is not great there were many passes in the LSU game that could have been completed including a touchdown at the end if the quarterback was more accurate, Florida has a more accurate quarterback, I think that Florida could win this by 10 or more. I'm hoping that Ole Miss wins but you never know.
Kiffin if a QB whisperer that's why he didn't find Chambliss or start him over Austin Simmons
Just wait until LSU can spend 50 million and get more five stars in one recruiting cycle than Ole Miss got in kiffins entire time at Ole Miss.
Just wait until LSU finishes with a top five recruiting class, just wait until Kiffin gets to year 3. In year 3, he's going to have more five stars than Ole Miss will get and he's going to have more money, just wait.
Just wait until LSU finishes with a top five recruiting class, just wait until Kiffin gets to year 3. In year 3, he's going to have more five stars than Ole Miss will get and he's going to have more money, just wait.
There is no more year three.
Posted by Craig86 on 9/20/26 at 6:44 pm
I keep seeing people say stuff like, this person will be good just wait until year 3...
There is no more year 3. Look around the college landscape there are not many teams or players that have the same personnel from the first year to the third. It's turned into college basketball almost like a one and done, you may do one year at one school, 2 years at another, your wide receivers are going to transfer to different places, coaches get hired, coaches get fired, they make it someone else in the portal and then you're on the bench and then you can go somewhere else there's a lot more moving parts now than there ever was.
It's not about recruiting the players in high school as much, and then holding on to them and then building a team around them that would be foolish in today's game because you have no guarantee that they're not going to go somewhere else unlike before where it was much more difficult to leave.
Every year a team could go 0 and 12 or they could go 12 and 0 and it all depends on the portal.
Every single year has to be the year that your team does well otherwise there will be massive turnover, people can twist and squirm and say whatever they want but the fact is if you don't get it done in a year, things are going to change whether that's coordinators, coaches, players, funding. You have to produce and you have to produce now there is no more wait until year three.
There is no more year 3. Look around the college landscape there are not many teams or players that have the same personnel from the first year to the third. It's turned into college basketball almost like a one and done, you may do one year at one school, 2 years at another, your wide receivers are going to transfer to different places, coaches get hired, coaches get fired, they make it someone else in the portal and then you're on the bench and then you can go somewhere else there's a lot more moving parts now than there ever was.
It's not about recruiting the players in high school as much, and then holding on to them and then building a team around them that would be foolish in today's game because you have no guarantee that they're not going to go somewhere else unlike before where it was much more difficult to leave.
Every year a team could go 0 and 12 or they could go 12 and 0 and it all depends on the portal.
Every single year has to be the year that your team does well otherwise there will be massive turnover, people can twist and squirm and say whatever they want but the fact is if you don't get it done in a year, things are going to change whether that's coordinators, coaches, players, funding. You have to produce and you have to produce now there is no more wait until year three.
Popular
23
