Started By
Message

re: So Penn Wagers messed up again

Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:55 am to
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96042 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

One Bama fan even said it is a smart play if the other team has no timeouts and you had the ball with 10 minutes left. He explained you could keep having false starts and ice the game
please link that.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95953 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

please link that.
coming right up
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95953 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:57 am to
from local Bama loon SEC Crazy

quote:

Say you have a 1 point lead with 12 minutes left and the other team has zero time outs, if the clock was running before a penalty, the clock starts back at 25 even after a penalty, so you could technically have movement in the offensive line at 5 seconds of each play clock and you could run the clock out with 12 minutes left, because after you get to the 5 then the 2 1/2 the one yard line the half yard line the inch line the fraction of an inch line, you run 25 seconds ( well 23 ) and have illegal motion.



LINK
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 12:02 pm
Posted by Hogwall Jackson
Denver
Member since Feb 2013
5057 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

from local Bama loon SEC Crazy Say you have a 1 point lead with 12 minutes left and the other team has zero time outs, if the clock was running before a penalty, the clock starts back at 25 even after a penalty, so you could technically have movement in the offensive line at 5 seconds of each play clock and you could run the clock out with 12 minutes left, because after you get to the 5 then the 2 1/2 the one yard line the half yard line the inch line the fraction of an inch line, you run 25 seconds ( well 23 ) and have illegal motion. LINK


Posted by 870Hog
99999 posts
Member since Jul 2011
16189 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37771 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

frick Penn Wagers. If he's the ref when your playing Bama your just about guaranteed a loss.


Where there's smoke ...

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95953 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:02 pm to
How he thought that was the rule is beyond me. Teams would have been doing this for years
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96042 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:03 pm to
lot of intelligence in that thread.
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:03 pm to
I know  One Bama fan even said it is a smart play if the other team has no timeouts and you had the ball with 10 minutes left. He explained you could keep having false starts and ice the game 




If someone would link this i'll promise to have it recited at my wake.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95953 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I know  One Bama fan even said it is a smart play if the other team has no timeouts and you had the ball with 10 minutes left. He explained you could keep having false starts and ice the game 




If someone would link this i'll promise to have it recited at my wake.
Dude look up like three posts
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

from local Bama loon SEC Crazy


What a strategy!
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:07 pm to
Oh dear
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95953 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:09 pm to
I just made a thread on it. Figured I owed it to the world
Posted by Foolish cock
South Cak
Member since Dec 2012
2529 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:21 pm to
He really is the worst. Always heard he flies a clemson flag at his house.
Posted by RazorHawk
Inverness, FL
Member since Dec 2004
514 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Agreed...during the game I mentioned to my son that I didn't understand why the clock was running. And while it's unlikely it would've changed the outcome, Arkansas should've had the chance. A lot of unlikely things have happened in the SEC the past couple of years...
I think on the starting of the clock, after the false start penalty and not starting it at the snap, all it did was that Bama did not have to snap it one more time. I don't think Arkansas would have gotten the ball back. If we would have gotten the ball back a huge deal would have been made of the error.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
96132 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:24 pm to
It was 4th down. Alabama could have tried to convert, but Arkansas would have had a chance.

I'm pretty sure that's the case anyways.
Posted by Hogwall Jackson
Denver
Member since Feb 2013
5057 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I think on the starting of the clock, after the false start penalty and not starting it at the snap, all it did was that Bama did not have to snap it one more time. I don't think Arkansas would have gotten the ball back. If we would have gotten the ball back a huge deal would have been made of the error.

Would've been 4th & 7 and we would have gotten the ball back with 20-30 seconds left. I would have to look at the clock.
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American southerner
Member since Nov 2013
35959 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

I'm trying to understand why this man is still a head referee. Anyone?


That is the proper take on this

he is not held accountable - many referees in the South deserve a shot at moving up, and he needs to be fired
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:31 pm to
What rule states the clock should have started on the snap? The rule clearly states that the clock should have started on the referee's signal since this was to complete a penalty. Now the ref could have declared this "unfair clock tactics" and started it on the snap, but he didn't probably because he didn't known that he could or he didn't feel the Bama lineman was trying to use the clock unfairly. He followed the rule as it was written in the rule book at least as I read it.
Posted by Hogwall Jackson
Denver
Member since Feb 2013
5057 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

What rule states the clock should have started on the snap? The rule clearly states that the clock should have started on the referee's signal since this was to complete a penalty. Now the ref could have declared this "unfair clock tactics" and started it on the snap, but he didn't probably because he didn't known that he could or he didn't feel the Bama lineman was trying to use the clock unfairly. He followed the rule as it was written in the rule book at least as I read it.

You should justdo 60 false starts in a row when you have the lead under 8 minutes so you can win and run out the clock.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter