Started By
Message
locked post

Sell me on Bama winning the SEC based solely on their defensive front 7....

Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:19 pm
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:19 pm
cause I'm sure as shite not buying it right now. That front 7 can't play offense too.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

cause I'm sure as shite not buying it right now. That front 7 can't play offense too.


Doesnt matter. We'll have enough offense to win the SEC. Petrino dont have the talent or skills to beat us in ttown and you know miles is gonna lose at least two.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Sell me on Bama winning the SEC based solely on their defensive front 7....


quote:

cause I'm sure as shite not buying it right now. That front 7 can't play offense too.


Do you typically ask and answer your own questions?
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 8:23 pm
Posted by hwnd
( O_o)
Member since Apr 2010
8114 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Sell me on Bama winning the SEC based solely on their defensive front 7


nope.avi
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:24 pm to
It is a system, it doesn't matter who the kids are on the field, just plug and play year after year until you are tired of winning.

:sitinacircle,begin:
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:25 pm to
Our front 7 won't have to play offense. We have a veteran OL returning four starters, one of the best RB's in the nation in Trent, some veteran WR's like Maze and Hanks, and some good new comers there as well like Carter, Shinn, White, Bell, etc. Throw in a veteran tight end in Williams and all we need from our QB is smart play and few turnovers. Sounds sort of like our formula in 2009 to me.
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 8:26 pm
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:26 pm to
I'm on the flagship this fall.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

It is a system, it doesn't matter who the kids are on the field, just plug and play year after year until you are tired of winning.


Exactly. Its why we wrapped up our third top 10 finish in a row last year. Know what thats like, seeing your team get three straight top tens in a row? not unless you're fifty plus you dont.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

I'm on the flagship this fall.


only because you hate bama too much to admit they're the obvious favorites.
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 8:30 pm
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:30 pm to
Ok, that's at least reasonable. However, in '09 y'all had a ridiculous defense and a QB that actually made plays. You sure McAaron or Simms will provide that? Not to mention your options to give TR a rest are dwindling. The way y'all are acting things will get pretty dicey in T-Town for Nicky if he drops a couple.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91640 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:32 pm to
If Bama still had Hart and Lacy healthy, I'd say they'd have to a shot to win the SEC by defense and running the ball. I'm not sold on McCarron or Sims at this point. Now that Lacy and Hart are hurt, I can't see their running game being as successful as it would have been. TR is still there, but he can only do so much. I also don't see anything intimidating about the WR set... 2-3 losses, IMO. I have USCe and Arky playing in the SEC Championship game as of now. I'm also giving Auburn a shot right now, yeah I said it..

CSB, I know.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91640 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:33 pm to
Let me rephrase: I'm giving Auburn a shot at Bama.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:35 pm to
quote:


Exactly. Its why we wrapped up our third top 10 finish in a row last year. Know what thats like, seeing your team get three straight top tens in a row? not unless you're fifty plus you dont.



Yeah, I have no idea who will be the next GMac2.0, Ingram2.0, or Jones2.0 but all are a dime a dozen who are easily replaced in this system.

Offense is over-rated anyway, from the wise mind of Powe, "The offense needs to get us 3 points and we'll take care of the rest".

This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 8:37 pm
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I have no idea who will be the next GMac2.0, Ingram2.0, or Jones2.0 but all are a dime a dozen who are easily replaced in this system.


Sims/MCaron, Richardson and a set of wideouts. Next question?

quote:

Offense is over-rated anyway,


How many top 10 finishes has Petrino gotten yall? Hell by this point Saban had two top 10's and a national title at bama.

Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42346 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

How many top 10 finishes has Petrino gotten yall? Hell by this point Saban had two top 10's and a national title at bama.



Shula left the man a talented team, no arguments here.

Nutt, however, did not.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37247 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Let me rephrase: I'm giving Auburn a shot at Bama.


That's funny.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Shula left the man a talented team, no arguments here.


bullshite. but whatever makes you fel better. By the way, even mike frickin shula could get a top 10 finish in three years. whats the fricking hold up with petrino?

quote:

Nutt, however, did not


By his third year, shula finished in the top 10. Why cant Petrino?
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:44 pm to
quote:


only because you hate bama too much to admit they're the obvious favorites.



I think they have more question marks. I thought Bama were the favorites last year.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

I think they have more question marks.



No you dont they have a new quarterback and fewer returning starters and a worse coach.
This post was edited on 7/27/11 at 8:46 pm
Posted by PipeHog
NWA
Member since Jun 2011
561 posts
Posted on 7/27/11 at 8:46 pm to
I don't think this Bama team is anything like the 09 team.

IMO Bama has the best LB's in the conference. I don't believe the d-line will be dominate.

The 09 team was dominate because it took 2 or 3 people to block Mt.Cody

Bama will be the #1 or #2 pick to win the west as long as Saban is there. I think the fact that Bama gets Arkansas and LSU at home is the best reason to pick them to win the west.

Can Bama stop Arkansas from scoring 24 points? Can Bama score 24 points on Arkansas?
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter