Started By
Message

re: SEC distributed $40.4 million to each school for the 2015-16 fiscal year

Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Hardware /= cable subscriber numbers


I didnt know Texas A&M fans accounted for any significant portion of the total revenue.

I dont think you know how this works...
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
51791 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

I didnt know Texas A&M fans accounted for any significant portion of the total revenue.



Texas Population - 28 M
The rest of the SECW population - 15.5 M
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Texas Population - 28 M
The rest of the SECW population - 15.5 M


I still dont think you understand how it works.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13174 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:11 pm to
Monetarily it did. Texas football is always rated the most valuable college sports team.

It happened to the Big East too. The teams that played football realized they were sharing too much with the basketball only schools. I don't want it to happen, but I don't see the big 6 plus a few others in the SEC sharing this much money forever.
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6174 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Everyone pay your respects to daddy A&M for getting you all this money


Had UF not agreed to give up the arrangement with SunSports, who knows what would have happened with the SEC Network. Not sure what percentage of the $40 million is directly related to the SECN, but this was the case last year :

quote:

While almost everyone in the SEC benefits from the SEC Network, you know who doesn’t benefit? Florida. Why? Because Florida was generating more revenue from its third-tier media rights to “local” distributors than it is now with them bundled with other league teams. By agreeing to go along with the SEC Network, Florida agreed to take money out of its pocket and give it to its rivals. Texas wouldn’t do that and it ultimately may destroy the Big 12.
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:20 pm
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Monetarily it did. Texas football is always rated the most valuable college sports team. It happened to the Big East too. The teams that played football realized they were sharing too much with the basketball only schools. I don't want it to happen, but I don't see big 6 plus a few others in the SEC sharing this much money forever.


I do, look at the non-revenue sharing Pro League(baseball). You have the "Haves" and the "Have Nots", and the league suffers from disinterest until the playoffs. Half of the "Have Nots" seasons are over after Spring Training, so ratings suffer most of the year. College Football doesn't want there to be 20 teams worth watching every year.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Had UF not agreed to give up the arrangement with SunSports, who knows what would have happened with the SEC Network


UF's annual revenue has skyrocketed since the SEC network was created, by over 40 million
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34910 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I still dont think you understand how it works.



Neither do you apparently.

All of this newfound money comes from the SEC Network.

The SEC Network gets its money by charging cable subscribers every month for access. Subscribers in the same state as a SEC program get charged more than those outside the SEC (up to five times as much).

Because A&M is in the SEC, the SEC gets to charge the maximum rate for the huge Texas population. In fact A&M plus Mizzou added 50% to the SEC cable subscriber footprint that existed prior to expansion, so a full third of the SEC Network revenue is because of A&M and Mizzou.

You are welcome.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37822 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

One of these days expansion will flip to contraction in every sport.


Except that all the schools being added are selected to increase the tv/money footprint.

W the exception of Vandy, all the schools in the SEC have the viewership and access to tv markets that make them worthwhile financially


Alabama for example can't leverage their dominance because their geographic base isn't big enough
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:25 pm
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34910 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Had UF not agreed to give up the arrangement with SunSports, who knows what would have happened with the SEC Network.


It would have never gotten off the ground.

But in that case UF would have been demonized nationally for being greedy like Texas is today.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

All of this newfound money comes from the SEC Network.

The SEC Network gets its money by charging cable subscribers every month for access. Subscribers in the same state as a SEC program get charged more than those outside the SEC (up to five times as much).

Because A&M is in the SEC, the SEC gets to charge the maximum rate for the huge Texas population. In fact A&M plus Mizzou added 50% to the SEC cable subscriber footprint that existed prior to expansion, so a full third of the SEC Network revenue is because of A&M and Mizzou.


I still dont think you know how this works, revenue from Texas A&M fans does not out weigh the rest, plain and simple, but you should probably go a little more into you explanation and actually think about it on a national scale and in terms to A&M and get over yourself...
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6174 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

UF's annual revenue has skyrocketed since the SEC network was created, by over 40 million


The revenue directly related to the SEC Network is a percentage of the distribution from the SEC. A year or two ago it was about $6.5 million per school. UF was making $10 million per year from Sun Sports and that contract was set to be renegotiated.

BTW, I'm not saying that there aren't benefits or that we shouldn't have done it. There is a decent chance our 3rd tier rights are now making as much or more with the SEC Network.
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:39 pm
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6174 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

But in that case UF would have been demonized nationally for being greedy like Texas is today.


For sure, Foley knew it was important for the league. He wasn't going to hold the SEC hostage.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
11099 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

revenue from Texas A&M fans does not out weigh the rest, plain and simple,


No, we get it, you're simple. That didn't need to be explained.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:38 pm to





Someone needs to put Sankey's face over Carrey's here, and perhaps add some SEC ADs (or FB coaches - like we know who the ADs look like) faces on the bellhops too....


Posted by ColoBama
The Kayng of College Fusball, CO
Member since Dec 2016
7433 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:39 pm to
You're welcome SEC schools.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

No, we get it, you're simple. That didn't need to be explained.



So with all your bolstering of A&M in here you still cant handle simple facts. Does it validate your real life to think so?
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37822 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:45 pm to
quote:


No, we get it, you're simple. That didn't need to be explained.


Leave it to an Aggie for not realizing that they don't contribute nearly as much as they think they do
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
11099 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:52 pm to
You apparently have zero knowledge of the SEC expansion and why the per team amount of revenue has increased so dramatically since the expansion. it has nothing to do with we're "pulling in" more money than the rest of the conference.

You keep using the word simple to explain your viewpoint, but as covered in my last post, that much is already obvious to the rest of the board.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57012 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

You apparently have zero knowledge of the SEC expansion and why the per team amount of revenue has increased so dramatically since the expansion.


I know quite enough about it.

However you must have zero knowledge of simple math


quote:

You keep using the word simple to explain your viewpoint, but as covered in my last post, that much is already obvious to the rest of the board.


Again, your simple brain can't handle the simple math. I am sorry your ego is hurt by all these simple concepts and the fact that A&M doesnt really make the world go round
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter