Started By
Message
re: SEC basketball ranked by various criteria
Posted on 1/30/15 at 12:58 am to E.Hubble
Posted on 1/30/15 at 12:58 am to E.Hubble
quote:
Half of the teams get voted in...u guys 1 and done much?
Oh cmon not even close to half lol.
But yes, we are notorious for flaming out in the tournament. Hence 26 apps and never won 4 in a row to reach the final four.
0
Posted on 1/30/15 at 12:58 am to AggieLandman
quote:
Acie Law IV is A&M's only All-American in mens basketball.
Not sure if the "1" is going to be more or less embarrassing than the question marks, but for the sake of accuracy you may as well throw it in there.
Damn! He was the only one I could find but I assumed surely I was missing more so I just put ??. I'll update. Wow
Posted on 1/30/15 at 1:05 am to Korin
quote:
How many of those are SEC titles though? Easier to win in the SWC without UK.
I definitely agree with that. SWC had no big dog in it so it was Arky's to lose. SEC, Big 12, ACC all have mammoths to beat.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 1:25 am to KCM0Tiger
There is Kentucky and then everbody else. They are the only SEC program that is consistent, by that I mean almost a damn century of being good
Posted on 1/30/15 at 2:18 am to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Conference Championships:
Mississippi State--10
This is incorrect.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 2:39 am to AggieLandman
quote:
Acie Law IV is A&M's only All-American in mens basketball.
Not sure if the "1" is going to be more or less embarrassing than the question marks, but for the sake of accuracy you may as well throw it in there.
Looks like his list of All-Americans might be kind of inaccurate. It looks like he might be listing first-team AAs only for some schools--but first, second, AND third-team AAs for other schools. Also, some individual players who were AA's multiple years are counted only one time for some schools but every season they were an AA for other schools.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:17 am to Korin
quote:
How many of those are SEC titles though? Easier to win in the SWC without UK.
yeah because Phi Slamma Jamma was always an easy win
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:28 am to KCM0Tiger
quote:
National Championships:
Kentucky--8
Florida--2
Arkansas--1
LSU--0
1935 motherfracker. If Arky and Bama can claim mythical football NCs then we can can claim em for bball.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:34 am to KCM0Tiger
Really think if you discount Arkansas dominance in the SWC due to "no big dog" in that conference you should, in turn, discount Kentucky's for the same reason. Arkansas was the big dog in the SWC
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:40 am to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Arky does have a legit argument for #2 with their longevity and advantage in conference titles
Arkansas' swc titles and other stats from that time are irrelevant in this discussion.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:43 am to lefty08
Lulz, 1935.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:46 am to T
quote:
Arkansas' swc titles and other stats from that time are irrelevant in this discussion.
Well that's convenient.
btw, I think the op can make whatever stats/criteria they want relevant on their own thread. Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:54 am to piggilicious
Somebody might as well start a theead about how a&m and arkansas are #2 & 3 all time in the sec for football since they have so many conference championships.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:56 am to T
So no one can count anything before they got to the sec. Then how about we discount everything that happened until this last expansion for everyone- that sounds fair.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 7:59 am to T
You can't discount before expansion unless you discount after.
ETA: We still get to claim our National Championship even if you choose to do so.
ETA: We still get to claim our National Championship even if you choose to do so.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 8:01 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:04 am to DC RaiseHerBack
Phi Slamma Jamma was a 3 year cycle in the SWAC.
Have to place Arkie with Florida as a tier under Kentucky, then LSU.
Have to place Arkie with Florida as a tier under Kentucky, then LSU.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 8:05 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:07 am to T
quote:
Arkansas' swc titles and other stats from that time are irrelevant in this discussion.
But you can't discount tourney appearances.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:14 am to spslayto
quote:
Have to place Arkie with Florida as a tier under Kentucky, then LSU.
I would agree with this.
quote:
But you can't discount tourney appearances.
And this. No one really cares or should care about conference titles imo.
This post was edited on 1/30/15 at 8:15 am
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:17 am to DC RaiseHerBack
I would place Florida slightly ahead of Arkansas...still, they are ahead of LSU and way ahead of everyone else in conference.
Posted on 1/30/15 at 8:20 am to DC RaiseHerBack
quote:
No one really cares or should care about conference titles imo.
Or more importantly conference tournament titles.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News