Started By
Message
re: SEC Baseball Programs Ranked Since Field Expansion to 64 Teams
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:55 pm to Farmer1906
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:55 pm to Farmer1906
Same amount of points for making the CWS as for making the CWS final?
1
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:56 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:
Same amount of points for making the CWS as for making the CWS final?
Same # of additional points. The team in the CWS final would had already earned the 4 points from making the CWS.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:57 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
A&M made the postseason 11/13 years before 1999 when it was much more difficult to make the postseason.
nah, you didn't have to play against gorilla ball like miss st did.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:58 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
I went back to 1999
Of course you did... Wouldn't want the 1998 and 1997 CWS appearances by State to mess up your rankings...
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:00 pm to MNW
quote:
Of course you did... Wouldn't want the 1998 and 1997 CWS appearances by State to mess up your rankings...
again, the time frame he began with is when the tournament was expanded and included super regionals. if one of the parameters is super regional appearances, no one would get credit for anything pre-1999 and the numbers would be inconsistent. i don't think he did it as any slight on any one team.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:01 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
nah, you didn't have to play against gorilla ball like miss st did.
just had to play the winningiest program of all time
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:02 pm to Uncle Gunnysack
quote:
just had to play the winningiest program of all time
that would be Southern Cal, just saying
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:03 pm to Uncle Gunnysack
Technically its Fordham, but tu is #2.
Edit: So Cal is #3.
Edit: So Cal is #3.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:06 pm to Farmer1906
well USC has double the national titles of anyone else, which, in your graph, would count for quite a bit. and for the sake of argument, Texas wasn't as strong in the 90s as they were prior and after
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:06 pm to Uncle Gunnysack
quote:
just had to play the winningiest program of all time
because yall were in a weak conference and you couldn't beat big bro
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:09 pm to Farmer1906
Lol @ Ole Miss
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:09 pm to lsufball19
I know. I was speaking of total wins.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:13 pm to kbrake37
quote:
Lol @ Ole Miss
yeah 15 appearances and only 5 super regionals and 1 CWS appearance is pretty weak. Tennessee has more trips to Omaha
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:15 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
because yall were in a weak conference and you couldn't beat big bro
actually, the SWC was pretty strong in the 80s. texas was a thorn in lot of teams side.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:24 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Super Regionals
Tied with us I believe.
And Uncle, Texas beat us for the title in 2002, I think we may have been bounced in previous CWS by them too.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:28 pm to theGarnetWay
Yea Texas knocked us out in 2002 and the NCAA changed the format the next year. We came out the loosers bracket and was completely out of pitchers. Them and Arizona st. Beat us in the finals in 70s or 80s
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:32 pm to Farmer1906
I agree with this.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:37 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
I'll gladly take our national title added to our score
If we go back all time, SC really starts pulling away the distance b/w 2nd and 3rd place. We have two other CWS Runner Ups and several other CWS appearances and Regionals.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:48 pm to Farmer1906
How in the hell do you have Arkansas ranked ahead of MSU? That's just most obvious in looking.
MSU has been to more CWS, 7 more regionals etc. Where did you find this garbage?
MSU has been to more CWS, 7 more regionals etc. Where did you find this garbage?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:50 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
1. LSU 109.5
2. South Carolina 108.0
Big 2.
Page 2 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News