Started By
Message
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:14 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Imagine your commissioner wanting to make your confeeence less competitive
quote:
by kywildcatfanone

Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:15 am to skrayper
quote:
Guess this is just college sports now.
Lawsuits and 30-year-old seniors.
Need to keep pushing until it’s too ridiculous to avoid the antitrust exemption.
Kevin Durant back at Texas to complete his delayed eligibility.
Bidding war for Burrow, Jefferson and Chase with them ending up at Ole Miss.
What else y’all got?
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:21 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
Aggies just lost a player to the NCAA. Frick off, tigger
LSU learned a trick from Bama and Lane’s ex about injunctions. Injunctions always work it seems. Texas Tech had to be shamed into not playing a degenerate gambler, since they had their injunction in place. Catch up aggy.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 10:22 am
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:22 am to paperwasp
quote:
I was listening to a podcast earlier today where the hosts were discussing some current NCAA rules, and no one knew for sure because they seem to change or get challenged so regularly.
Imagine trying to coach right now and navigate all of this, trying to not fall behind but not making any multi-million-dollar mistakes.
Right on cue. What happens when these eligibility rulings flip flop in court during the middle of the actual season?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:39 am to OleVaught14
quote:
Sankey is right to do this. Just as he was in the Alabama case. And hopefully in this pro-football situation.
Yea screw those guys wanting 5th years. I'm sure you feel the same about a guy getting a 6th year.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:52 am to NussBusDriver
No, really it's just screw guys who have played professionally and now want to return to college.
No particular issue with guys who never played professionally - like Pavia and the 100+ guys who got 5th, 6th, hell even 9th years like that.
No particular issue with guys who never played professionally - like Pavia and the 100+ guys who got 5th, 6th, hell even 9th years like that.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:55 am to OleVaught14
quote:
No particular issue with guys who never played professionally - like Pavia and the 100+ guys who got 5th, 6th, hell even 9th years like that.
So playing forever is cool? No limits on eligibility? Sinus infection equals 10th year. There is no consistency with your position. Either all of these guys should be eligible or none of them. Either the NCAA rules can be enforced or they can't. You can't want selective enforcing of the rules and think you are on the correct side of this.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 11:00 am to NussBusDriver
Well lucky for all us fans, this might be getting back under some control:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 11:19 am
Popular
Back to top


1







