Started By
Message
re: Saban Goes Full Hypocrite: Florida shouldn't play in BCS bowl w/o winning East
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:43 pm to Prominentwon
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:43 pm to Prominentwon
05:2
06:2
07:2
08:5
09:4
10:2
11:1
miles averages 2.5 but the program was given to him in much better condition than saban found it in.
saban took over a team missed bowls in 98 and 99 and had extremely crappy coaching and turned them around and laid the foundation for what was to come later.
Miles just had to maintain and he has done that but he has had problems closing out a perfect season because of ingame coaching.
what was wrong with LSU when saban left that miles had to fix?
qb situation was good, team was full of talent and our recruiting ground was locked up.
06:2
07:2
08:5
09:4
10:2
11:1
miles averages 2.5 but the program was given to him in much better condition than saban found it in.
saban took over a team missed bowls in 98 and 99 and had extremely crappy coaching and turned them around and laid the foundation for what was to come later.
Miles just had to maintain and he has done that but he has had problems closing out a perfect season because of ingame coaching.
what was wrong with LSU when saban left that miles had to fix?
qb situation was good, team was full of talent and our recruiting ground was locked up.
1
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:43 pm to Bellabama
quote:
The BCSCG makes no mention of champions... only 1 and 2.
hilarious
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:43 pm to cas4t
I totally agree with Saban's comments.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:43 pm to Bellabama
quote:
It's a different standard for the BCSCG vs the BCS bowl berths. I can understand why people think he's a hypocrite, but I can also see where he makes the distinction. Bowl berths that are not the BCS Championship are given to conference champions, so I assume his thinking is that a division champion is the runner up to a conference champion. The BCSCG makes no mention of champions... only 1 and 2.
You shouldn't have as rigorous a standard for you national title game as you should for your prestigious bowl games.
Not sure why Saban wants the sugar. His team will just be demotivated and embarrass the conference again.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:44 pm to therick711
quote:
You shouldn't have as rigorous a standard for you national title game as you should for your prestigious bowl games.
Well, those are the rules. I didn't write them. Have you read them?
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:44 pm to therick711
quote:
Because you purport to quote things that aren't a quote and a coach revealed that his inconsistent position was last year. He has returned to his original position, and Bama fans are trying to justify it by laughing and pretending like they aren't a bunch of sheep that quote talking points on message boards.
Any other questions?
Got it. So it's okay (and the most obvious thing in the world according to you) for a fan who really has no significant vested interest to want the best possible outcome for their team, but not for a coach who is paid to achieve the best possible outcome for their team. Very interesting.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:45 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
heartbreakTiger
stop it
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:45 pm to Bellabama
quote:
Well, those are the rules. I didn't write them. Have you read them?
Given the preposterous argument you just made which there isn't a rule for anyway, I know you haven't read them because it is obvious you can't read.
This post was edited on 11/26/12 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:45 pm to therick711
If you didn't understand the context of the post it is probably because your arse is still sore After losing the nc and your revenge game on your home field. I get it and I wasn't saying we would go or should but if you don't think the humor on this board that would ensue if Florida was screwed over by Bama after that statement then I don't know what to tell you. Grow up and quit letting these Bama arse whippings cloud your judgement.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:45 pm to Bellabama
quote:
Championship Replacement If any of the bowls’ traditional anchor hosts have been lost to the BCS National Championship Game, that bowl will be allowed to select a replacement team from the eligible pool before other picks are made. If more than one bowl loses a host conference champion, the bowl which lost the BCS No. 1 will choose its replacement from the pool first, followed by the bowl that lost the BCS No. 2.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:46 pm to Alahunter
I bet you do.
How'd you like the Bama board the other day?
I hope you learned a valuable lesson.
How'd you like the Bama board the other day?
I hope you learned a valuable lesson.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:46 pm to labamafan
quote:
If you didn't understand the context of the post it is probably because your arse is still sore After losing the nc and your revenge game on your home field. I get it and I wasn't saying we would go or should but if you don't think the humor on this board that would ensue if Florida was screwed over by Bama after that statement then I don't know what to tell you. Grow up and quit letting these Bama arse whippings cloud your judgement.
Still with nothing new or original to say. Shocking.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:46 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
hilarious
It has to be that way because of the lack of consistency between the conferences. They even make the point that 3 teams from a conference can make BCS games if neither 1 nor 2 in the BCS is the conference champion.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:46 pm to Bellabama
quote:
It's a different standard for the BCSCG vs the BCS bowl berths. I can understand why people think he's a hypocrite, but I can also see where he makes the distinction. Bowl berths that are not the BCS Championship are given to conference champions, so I assume his thinking is that a division champion is the runner up to a conference champion. The BCSCG makes no mention of champions... only 1 and 2.
So, we should have played Georgia again in the BCS NCship. Got it. Thanks.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:47 pm to roadGator
quote:
roadGator
Glad to see you in here. I was afraid it was just me, the cornasses, and the gumps.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:47 pm to labamafan
quote:
Bama arse whippings
wut
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:47 pm to elposter
I miss the good ol days when fanbases would drown their sorrows in a pool full of liquor.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:49 pm to roadGator
I understand this part. Which is why I said that I understand that people think him a hypocrite. I just don't think his point goes against his stance last year as much as others do.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:49 pm to cas4t
Bait wasn't meant for you.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 1:50 pm to Bellabama
t's a different standard for the BCSCG vs the BCS bowl berths. I can understand why people think
I do not think he's being a hypocrite. I think he was responding to the scenario and the way it played out. He's not saying UGA or AL deserve to play over the Gators for the Sugar Bowl. He's saying that due to the fact that FLA has 1 loss that it is unfortunate for the loser of the SEC Champ game that they will not get a chance to play for the Sugar Bowl.
That's my best shot at explaining it.
quote:
he's a hypocrite, but I can also see where he makes the distinction. Bowl berths that are not the BCS Championship are given to conference champions, so I assume his thinking is that a division champion is the runner up to a conference champion. The BCSCG makes no mention of champions... only 1 and 2.
I do not think he's being a hypocrite. I think he was responding to the scenario and the way it played out. He's not saying UGA or AL deserve to play over the Gators for the Sugar Bowl. He's saying that due to the fact that FLA has 1 loss that it is unfortunate for the loser of the SEC Champ game that they will not get a chance to play for the Sugar Bowl.
That's my best shot at explaining it.
Page 16 of 26
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News