Started By
Message
re: Ranking the SEC East historically
Posted on 1/15/13 at 10:19 pm to Peter Buck
Posted on 1/15/13 at 10:19 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
Were you hoping his cock was bigger?
No dick breath. Was actually hoping Vol fans had more pride and honor than to live this far in the past.
Shall I post several philosophical quotes regarding living in the past and the perils of doing so? Or would you prefer to live with the dream of having a large cock in your **** mouth?
Posted on 1/15/13 at 10:43 pm to scrooster
You can quote all you want. Discussing the historical aspects of an entity or an event does not mean one is living in the past. I can understand why Gamecocks would not want to enter a discussion about the history of the SEC, or College Football, or National Championships.
In any case, you not only brought up the subject of his penis, but you vividly described it and lamented in reference of its size and condition. I understand that you historically take great pride in cheering for cocks, so I guess there actually is a correlation with the original thread albeit a bit off center...
In any case, you not only brought up the subject of his penis, but you vividly described it and lamented in reference of its size and condition. I understand that you historically take great pride in cheering for cocks, so I guess there actually is a correlation with the original thread albeit a bit off center...
Posted on 1/15/13 at 10:49 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
Alabama- 827
Tennessee-799
Too friggin' close.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 11:18 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
You can quote all you want. Discussing the historical aspects of an entity or an event does not mean one is living in the past. I can understand why Gamecocks would not want to enter a discussion about the history of the SEC, or College Football, or National Championships.
In any case, you not only brought up the subject of his penis, but you vividly described it and lamented in reference of its size and condition. I understand that you historically take great pride in cheering for cocks, so I guess there actually is a correlation with the original thread albeit a bit off center...
2/10 on the relevance scale. 12/2 on the dumass scale.
At any rate ... I'll begin here. frick with Sparky dumass.
People who live in the past generally are afraid to compete in the present. I've got my faults, but living in the past is not one of them. There's no future in it. ~ Sparky Anderson
Posted on 1/15/13 at 11:42 pm to scrooster
In your opinion, how far back is the past though?
Edit: How far back should someone go?
Edit: How far back should someone go?
This post was edited on 1/15/13 at 11:43 pm
Posted on 1/15/13 at 11:45 pm to scrooster
You think a historical discussion is the same as living in the past and you like to talk about other men's cocks....
...but everyone else is dumb and gay... Not you....
...but everyone else is dumb and gay... Not you....
Posted on 1/15/13 at 11:54 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
In your opinion, how far back is the past though?
Edit: How far back should someone go?
Reasonably speaking - within sanity's limits?
30-50 yrs when talking about tail you've nailed.
30-70 yrs when talking about your cars.
8 yrs when talking politics.
15-20 years when talking sports.
If one has any good taste or class.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 11:59 pm to scrooster
quote:
15-20 years when talking sports.
Works for me.
Posted on 1/16/13 at 12:07 am to USMC Gators
Well this thread got derailed
I'll take credit for that
I'll take credit for that
Popular
Back to top


1





