Started By
Message

re: Question for you Gumps. Houndstooth and NC discussion inside.

Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by jameison125
Jersey
Member since Aug 2007
2184 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Cool man.. you & LSwho got me fired up in this thread.. and thats hard to do for me..
I am super cool!


Just remember. It could be worse.
Posted by taylormade
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
9863 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Just remember. It could be worse.


quote:

It could always be worse


is what i say..

But yeah.. yall win.. you got me..
let me go get my Kleenex to

Posted by jameison125
Jersey
Member since Aug 2007
2184 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

taylormade


You can't cry. I hold you to higher standards than that. Only Aubie's cry.

Posted by tigahbait62
Da Booty Club
Member since Nov 2009
1788 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:26 pm to
how many nattys did Bama retroactively claim after the fact to fudge the number of titles? Was it 5?

And this is a legit question
Posted by taylormade
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
9863 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

You can't cry. I hold you to higher standards than that. Only Aubie's cry


I cried to Titanic..

True Story..

My Heart will go on..

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Well LSU Could Claim 4

Actually LSU could claim 7:

2007 BCS
2003 BCS
1962 Berryman
1958 Consensus (AP/UPI)
1936 Williamson
1935 Williamson
1908 National Championship Foundation
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

how many nattys did Bama retroactively claim after the fact to fudge the number of titles?


I think you mean "acknowledge"...They were indeed awarded by the different publications long before we started saying "Hey, we had NCs before Bryant too"...The University of Alabama didn't fabricate anything that we acknowledge as Championship seasons.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 3:32 pm
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24534 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:31 pm to
Should they change it to #1.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 3:32 pm
Posted by T Rey WI
Back in the south where I belong!
Member since Dec 2010
2937 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:31 pm to
Up until the end of Coach Bryant's career the #12 meant more than it does now. Under Coach Bryant the number on the Helmet Logo was "special" and a very sellect few ever got to wear it. It was Coach Bryant's jersey number. Many years ago, 3 former #12 Qb's had a restaurant named 12. Within the last year (or so) one of those 3 QB's started a new wine lable called 12. The primary players to wear #12 under Bryant were Joe Namath / Kenny Stabler / Steve Sloan.

After the 2009 BCSNCG ESPN attempted to change it to #13 thinking it was because of the number of championships and they still use 13. But the Alabama Logo is still the #12 helmet.
Posted by breeze
Member since Jan 2011
465 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't it have a "13*" on it then?


most media only acknowledges 12. I think 1941 is the one in dispute. The rest are solid.

Posted by crimson crazy
Member since Oct 2008
20710 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Bama has no where near 13 titles, sorry


Sorry for bad grammar?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69078 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

It was 12 before & during 2009, but now it is 13..
usually.. I thought it was saying NC's!

And We will see who shows up on 1.09.11


So does anything printed before 1983 show an Alabama helmet with the number 6 on it?
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20957 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

most media only acknowledges 12. I think 1941 is the one in dispute. The rest are solid.


I agree, but it's almost painful when you hear one of them claiming 13.

I could understand them claiming 13 if they claimed 1945, 1966, or something like that, but 1941 is the one that makes me cringe.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 3:41 pm
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:42 pm to
I know for a long time the helmets used to always show whatever year it was on the side. An 89 in 1989 for example. It wasn't until later that 12 became the standard I saw everywhere. I see lots of stuff with 13 on it since 2009.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69078 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

how many nattys did Bama retroactively claim after the fact to fudge the number of titles? Was it 5?

And this is a legit question


Hre's the answer to all your questions. They went from 6 to 11 thanks to their SID in 1983...

LINK


Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:44 pm to
And like I said above, we didn't invent or create those titles...we just acknowledged that there were indeed titles awarded before Bear Bryant's tenure.
Posted by MagillaGuerilla
Nick Fairley Fan Club, Founder
Member since Nov 2009
35671 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

The primary players to wear #12 under Bryant were Joe Namath / Kenny Stabler / Steve Sloan.


Don't forget Pat Trammell, Coach Bryant's favorite player and person.
Posted by RollTideRockStar
Member since Jan 2010
4477 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:49 pm to
Every fanbase just wants Alabama to have less and talk themselves into being as great.

Saw some LSU post above said they could claim 7 right now. I guarantee, IF they win this year, they'll try to say we only have 8 and they're tied with us.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 3:50 pm
Posted by RollTideRockStar
Member since Jan 2010
4477 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Don't forget Pat Trammell, Coach Bryant's favorite player and person.


Nothing ever effected the Bear like Pat's death. Truly sad.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
69078 posts
Posted on 12/13/11 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

And like I said above, we didn't invent or create those titles...we just acknowledged that there were indeed titles awarded before Bear Bryant's tenure.


True, but unlike most programs Bama does claim them and no offense to you since I don't know you personally, many Bama fans use it as some sort of superiority thing to hold over everyone else. As has been pointed out here, other programs could claim many more titles than they do, especially when you go back beyond the 1930's. Auburn for example has been awarded national championships in 1913, 1914, 1957, 1958, 1983, 1993, 2004 and 2010. But like virtually every other program we only really claim the ones awarded by the major services. The main reason Auburn and virtually every other program only claims these titles is to do otherwise just seems to be an attempt to over inflate someone importance.

I'm not saying this as a troll or to start a flame war. I'm mearly pointing out the fact from the outside looking in, to the rest of the college football world, Alabama claiming 13 NC's and bringing it up so much and making such a huge deal about it is beyond absurd. Yes Alabama has one of, if not the, richest histories in college football. But to over inflate that history in this manner is just off putting to others.
This post was edited on 12/13/11 at 3:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter