Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss could have hired both Morris or Pruitt and passed
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:14 pm to rebeloke
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:14 pm to rebeloke
From what I understand, Pruitt and Morris would take the job if offered. However, why would Ole Miss offer as long as the team continued to develop? Why start over with new coaches and a new system when there are some pretty good players returning? Ole Miss has the chance to be very competitive next year and the current staff is made up of very good recruiters. With the sanctions being pretty much our self-imposed with an additional bowl ban, Ole Miss is not in that bad of shape. It would be counterproductive to change personnel.
1
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:38 pm to rebeloke
quote:
Who are you? And why should I care what you say?
What a fricking shitty deflection.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:43 pm to rebeloke
quote:
Ole Miss could have hired both Morris or Pruitt and passed by. Both were asking for the job
That's a textbook example of 'delusional' loanshark!
This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:56 pm to BiscuitEater
quote:
loanshark
Posted on 12/7/17 at 2:57 pm to rebeloke
Nothing short of adorable that you still believe the people telling you this after the countless lies they've fed you the last couple years.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:04 pm to Powell
quote:You also understood that the violations weren't going to be too bad, and the sanctions would be no more than the self-imposed, and Hugh Freeze would be perfectly fine and secure as OM HC for years to come.
From what I understand, Pruitt and Morris would take the job if offered.
quote:Maybe because Chad Morris has experience as a HC and he is a dynamic offensive mind that OM will need in the future?
However, why would Ole Miss offer as long as the team continued to develop?
quote:You've got players and their parents that threatened to sue OM because your Admin place restrictions on their transfers. WTF?
Why start over with new coaches and a new system when there are some pretty good players returning?
quote:OleMiss wasn't competitive this year, and you have talent trying to leave the Grove as we type.
Ole Miss has the chance to be very competitive next year and the current staff is made up of very good recruiters.
quote:You got an additional 13 scholly reductions tagged on to the self-imposed, along with a 2 yr bowl ban that allows players to leave the program. OM will be in really bad shape within 2 yrs "IF" they can keep any players from transferring.
With the sanctions being pretty much our self-imposed with an additional bowl ban, Ole Miss is not in that bad of shape.
quote:No one wants that job, that's why they got stuck with Luke.
It would be counterproductive to change personnel.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:07 pm to rebeloke
quote:
Now either our AD is dumb as a box of rocks or you gotten served a shite sandwich with mustard on it.
Alex, I'll take dumb as rocks AD's for $500.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:33 pm to PorkRoast
quote:
You can't truly believe this.
I believe he does...smh
Posted on 12/7/17 at 3:47 pm to rebeloke
More like Ole Miss is too embarrassed to contact any serious candidate - which is why Luke is not longer interim. You think OM is not the biggest laughing stock in collegiate sports right now.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:38 pm to RT1941
quote:
got an additional 13 scholly reductions tagged on to the self-imposed
Hey, shite for brains.
PDF of NCAA ruling
quote:
Page 56 from the document. . . Self-imposed 10 and additional 3 going forward. 13 total. It is broken down specifically on that page when released.
Posted on 12/7/17 at 4:43 pm to rebeloke
Did you check the Ole Miss Craiglist job openings to see if they even applied?
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:10 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Google Chad Morris Ole Miss. He wanted the job
So are you saying your AD felt more confident in Matt Luke?
Posted on 12/7/17 at 5:26 pm to lsufball19
So you vote box of rocks? Check
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News