Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/13 at 2:58 pm to antibarner
quote:
I want the play flagged next time they run it.
Okay, I've taken the time to read the NYT article your OP references.
Here's the link for anyone else since you were too lazy to put in your OP:
LINK
I've read the pertinent section 5 times and I see no clear and compelling case that what Prosch did was illegal or worthy of a penalty. The email response from the REC league office is hardly damning of Prosch. Certainly the REC would have let us know if Prosch violated some rule.
(Emphasis added below by me)
quote:
On the 39-yard touchdown pass from Nick Marshall to Sammie Coates that helped Auburn to tie the game at 28-28 with 32 seconds left, Tigers fullback Jay Prosch was 5 yards downfield blocking Alabama linebacker C. J. Mosley on the same side of the field as the pass. When Marshall passed to Coates, it appeared that Prosch was making illegal contact, according to Rule 7-3-8 of the N.C.A.A. rule book.
In an email response to a request for an interpretation of the rule, the Southeastern Conference said, “It is not offensive pass interference when, after the snap, an ineligible receiver immediately charges and contacts an opponent at a point not more than 1 yard beyond the neutral zone and does not continue the contact more than 3 yards beyond the neutral zone.”
Prosch was an eligible receiver and he was making contact with a defender 5 yards down field. Mosley was not able to get to Marshall and Alabama’s defensive back had to come up to try to make the tackle on Marshall, who passed over his head to a wide-open Coates.
That's some pretty weak sauce for "vindication".
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:08 pm to BrerTiger
He violated that rule. The play as it was run is illegal.
I listened to Phil Savage saying the same thing. He likened it to some flag football play and said both Prosch and the TE on the opposite side were blocking downfield on the play.
I listened to Phil Savage saying the same thing. He likened it to some flag football play and said both Prosch and the TE on the opposite side were blocking downfield on the play.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:11 pm to antibarner
quote:
He violated that rule. The play as it was run is illegal.
nope Prosch was never 5 yards downfield when the ball was thrown.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:19 pm to antibarner
quote:
He violated that rule. The play as it was run is illegal.
I listened to Phil Savage saying the same thing. He likened it to some flag football play and said both Prosch and the TE on the opposite side were blocking downfield on the play.
Still going, this is amazing
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:23 pm to antibarner
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:27 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
All this time and the damn "illegal" block is fricking two yards from the LOS.
frick. This isn't near as funny anymore.
frick. This isn't near as funny anymore.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:30 pm to extremetigerfanatic
quote:
frick. This isn't near as funny anymore.
oh no, this is still hilarious, it's like watching Helen Keller argue with a lamp shade.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:35 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Prosch was never 5 yards downfield when the ball was thrown.
you can actually see Prosch hit the defender 2 yards out - and then if you watching Prosch's you can clearly see the right shoulder pad lift up as he is spun back around by Mosley.. huh, funny, anti is arguing about a no-call.. Mosley was holding Prosch, THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A HOLDING CALL ON MOSLEY, AUBURN WAS SCREWED!!!
/rant
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 12/4/13 at 3:43 pm to BaddestAndvari
Posted on 12/4/13 at 4:50 pm to BaddestAndvari
quote:
oh no, this is still hilarious, it's like watching Helen Keller argue with a lamp shade.
I've had a really shitty week at work but this thread delivers.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 4:57 pm to antibarner
Oh man if Phil Savage said so it must be true.
This is sarcasm you ignorant gump
This is sarcasm you ignorant gump
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:12 pm to wartiger2004
Rick Neuheisel is now saying it was illegal. Looking at that gif Prosch was chicken fighting with Mosley SIX yards past the LOS when the ball was released.
Blind Barners. Rick Neuheisel,the NYTimes and Phil Savage all saw it like I did.
Blind Barners. Rick Neuheisel,the NYTimes and Phil Savage all saw it like I did.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:15 pm to BaddestAndvari
quote:
oh no, this is still hilarious, it's like watching Helen Keller argue with a lamp shade.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:18 pm to antibarner
The fact that this is your life...this is what your mom tried to stop smoking cigarettes for nine months for
And this is your life...it's really depressing
And this is your life...it's really depressing
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:18 pm to Thunder Tiger
Dismukes and it looks like number 67 were charging downfield at the time the ball was thrown...67 was nearing the 35 when the ball was released. Prosch was clearly run blocking near the 34. LOS was the 39 and a half
Illegal play and more and more analysts are agreeing...nice tackle there 77 that hold was plain to see.
Illegal play and more and more analysts are agreeing...nice tackle there 77 that hold was plain to see.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:21 pm to antibarner
I'm with you all the way it was illegal, provocative almost incited a riot!
Hold on... WTF am I talking about?
Never mind.
Hold on... WTF am I talking about?
Never mind.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:22 pm to BarberitosDawg
There was a blatant hold on Auburn on the Hail Mary pass,check the bear hug by the left tackle.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:24 pm to antibarner
I can't believe this is still going.
BTW, the play was as legal as they come.
BTW, the play was as legal as they come.
Posted on 12/4/13 at 6:27 pm to BaddestAndvari
Over 30 posts about this just today.
Page 13 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News