Started By
Message
re: Oher blindsided, gaslit by Tuohy family; wishes he had gone to Tennessee
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:40 pm to tigerbait2010
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:40 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Still did the tuohy’s actually make that much money from the movie?
Sean probably makes more money selling tacos in Memphis each month.
1
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:40 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
quote:
The Tuohy's sold the rights through the conservatorship
The weird part is there is apparently a document that Oher himself allegedly signed that gave all rights to the movie company.
That one he does not recollect signing.
But it would be unnecessary with the conservatorship. It sounds like the production company adding an extra layer of protection from a lawsuit today (due diligence).
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:41 pm to TrumpedUpVol
Wait that movie wasn't real? Who could've seen this coming.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:42 pm to TrumpedUpVol
quote:
wishes he had gone to Tennessee
print the tshirts?
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:43 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
quote:
I didn't read the book (obviously).
Is the tone to Oher the same as the movie?
The book is much better.
I appreciate your candor.
When you watched the movie, did the Michael character match the character in the book?
Am I wrong assessing the character in the movie as slightly better than mental retardation?
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:43 pm to meansonny
quote:
My "fricked" comment is if this goes to a civil trial with a jury.
It has MSJ written all over it, which wouldn't get to a jury
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:43 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Didn’t he sell the Taco Bell’s
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:43 pm to lsufball19
I don't know msj
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:44 pm to meansonny
quote:
I don't know msj
Motion for Summary Judgment
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:44 pm to DMagic
quote:
Didn’t he sell the Taco Bell’s
I have no idea. But while he had them I don't think he did too badly. (Some quick research shows he's sold off about 90% of his fast food operations -- at one time they owned about 115 restaurants).
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:44 pm to meansonny
quote:No proof of that other than his word. The Tuoys could come back and say they did explain it very carefully to him. And then it’s he said she said with the only evidence being the signed paper
He also admits that they said it was the same thing as adoption.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:46 pm to TrumpedUpVol
The whole gas lighting thing is such bullshite 
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:46 pm to Henry Jones Jr
In the ESPN article it quotes him saying he knew it wasn’t adoption. People don’t read
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:47 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Motion for Summary Judgment
Thanks.
You may be right.
The "no comments" from the Tuohys may be evidence that there is a potential dispute of claims.
But who knows. They are obviously much better lawyered up today than Michael Oher was at 18 years old.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:47 pm to lsufball19
quote:
It has MSJ written all over it, which wouldn't get to a jury
Sounds like it would have SOL written all over it too (Statute of Limitations).
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:47 pm to TrumpedUpVol
Wait, that story was complete bullshite?
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:48 pm to DMagic
quote:
the ESPN article it quotes him saying he knew it wasn’t adoption. People don’t read
You also left out when the future high school senior was told that it was the same as adoption by the Tuohys
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:48 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Sounds like it would have SOL written all over it too (Statute of Limitations).
hence an MSJ...as a matter of law, Oher wouldn't be entitled to relief due to the SOL for his claim
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:49 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
Sounds like it would have SOL written all over it too (Statute of Limitations).
The conservatorship is still active today. I presume residual checks from media rights are as well.
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:51 pm to meansonny
quote:
The conservatorship is still active today. I presume residual checks from media rights are as well.
the clock doesn't reset every time a new check clears. It would go to the date of the actual alleged fraud, i.e. the execution of the conservatorship or when Oher knew of the fraud involved in the same, which he himself has said was at least in 2011 if not before
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 12:52 pm
Page 4 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News