Started By
Message
New SEC rule
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:14 pm
No players given eligibility by crying Ole Miss judges are eligible
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:15 pm to tigerskin
I expected to thread to be that no one could use or say the #5 any longer
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:15 pm to tigerskin
We just hope y’all play all these guys we didn’t want.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:16 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
I expected to thread to be that no one could use or say the #5 any longer
You are no longer allowed to plead the fif.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:19 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
You are no longer allowed to plead the fif.
Is it true that LSU has to mark their football field at the 4.5 line instead of every 5 yards?
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:20 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
Is it true that LSU has to mark their football field at the 4.5 line instead of every 5 yards?
We cannot use the number 5 at all, even if it is actually .5 ... this is serious shite we are talking about here.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:20 pm to tigerskin
I hope Jayden doesn't hear about the 5 for 5 rule.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:21 pm to tigerskin
Oh hypocrisy at its finest!
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:22 pm to tigerskin
Any state hosting Ole Miss should legally ban the 24-year-old QB from playing in said state.
Rules are rules.
Rules are rules.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:38 pm to NFLSU
Yep. The NCAA was clear. He is not eligible. Boycott playing Ole Miss
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:40 pm to tigerskin
quote:
No players given eligibility by crying Ole Miss judges are eligible
I am not really on Ole Miss's side because Chambliss shouldn't have gotten it either, but he didn't get it AFTER becoming pro...
The two aren't the same.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:41 pm to ForeverGator
The point is you can't pick and choose injunctions
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:55 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:56 pm to ForeverGator
Ah. ForeverMelter at it again. 
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:56 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
I am not really on Ole Miss's side because Chambliss shouldn't have gotten it either, but he didn't get it AFTER becoming pro...
The two aren't the same.
Situations aren't the same but there are rules being broken in both cases. Why do we allow a TRO to circumvent the rules in one case but not the other?
That's why this is being challenged IMO.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 3:58 pm to tigerskin
The solution is simple. Just have LSU and Ole Miss forfeit games that the SEC deems had ineligible players (notwithstanding the TROs).
Easy fix.
But no Ole Miss or LSU fan would go for that.
Easy fix.
But no Ole Miss or LSU fan would go for that.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 4:01 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
The solution is simple. Just have LSU and Ole Miss forfeit games that the SEC deems had ineligible players (notwithstanding the TROs).
Easy fix.
I agree, either play by the rules or don't.
Posted on 8/25/26 at 4:04 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
The solution is simple. Just have LSU and Ole Miss forfeit games that the SEC deems had ineligible players (notwithstanding the TROs). Easy fix. But no Ole Miss or LSU fan would go for that.
I promise you Lane would sign up for that
Popular
Back to top
8










