Started By
Message
re: New Bham News article comparing Bama NC's to Notre Dame
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:20 am to FlukerFlakes
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:20 am to FlukerFlakes
If bama has 27, AU has 24. Hell 3rd place in the SEC = NC!
AU now has 24 national championships using updated bammer math.
Deal with it!
AU now has 24 national championships using updated bammer math.
Deal with it!
3
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:21 am to elposter
Why not just claim the AP,Coaches,and BCS. You would still have the most and the rest of the football world would not be able to snicker at you. Bama doesn't need the 1932 weedwacker NC to prove your manhood. 
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:21 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Woo bama math is awesome! Good thing they stick to liberal arts and leave the number crunching to us.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:21 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
Most national champions all-time
1. Alabama- 14
If you're counting the "My Weekly Reader" national titles, that award would go to Prinecton or Yale.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:21 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
Why not just claim the AP,Coaches,and BCS. You would still have the most and the rest of the football world would not be able to snicker at you. Bama doesn't need the 1932 weedwacker NC to prove your manhood.
Why don't you say the same thing to UT fans? Oh that's right, you're only concerned about Bama since 1/9.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:23 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:23 am to 14&Counting
quote:
I didn't know we were counting titles awarded by the Eufala Tribune
So Alabama's BS titles are legit, but no other team's are ?
Gump logic.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:24 am to FlukerFlakes
Damn, that's gotta suck being just dominated by your state rival.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:25 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
Why not just claim the AP,Coaches,and BCS. You would still have the most and the rest of the football world would not be able to snicker at you. Bama doesn't need the 1932 weedwacker NC to prove your manhood.
Why don't you say the same for these schools as well??????
If we are being consistent here:
ND has 8, not the 11 they claim
USC has 7, not the 11 they claim
Michigan has 2, not the 11 they claim
Bama has 9, not the 14 they claim
Tennessee has 2, not the 6 they claim
Pitt has 2, not the 9 they claim
Minnesota has 4, not the 7 they claim
Ohio State has 5, not the 7 they claim
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:26 am to tom1987
article bro.Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:26 am to FlukerFlakes
Because none of those other teams make license plates and t shirts they wear every day saying their BS number of titles. Plus because you are a douche.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:27 am to USMC Gators
UT fans don't have the brain power to have a reasonable conversation with. I was under the impression that Bamas' fans would. I was wrong.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:27 am to FlukerFlakes
AP/Coaches
Bama 9
ND 8
OU 7
USC 7
Miami 5
Nebraska 5
Ohio St 5
Minnesota 4
Texas 4
Florida 3
Top 10!
Bama 9
ND 8
OU 7
USC 7
Miami 5
Nebraska 5
Ohio St 5
Minnesota 4
Texas 4
Florida 3
Top 10!
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 10:28 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:28 am to tom1987
Championships before the BCS era are pretty much crap. Luckily for Bama, they are less than a week away from having the most either way you look at it.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:28 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn math puts Au at 1. 57 was bogus as hell. Ineligible for postseason play that yr and all.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:29 am to We_Need_Cam
quote:
Because none of those other teams make license plates and t shirts they wear every day saying their BS number of titles. Plus because you are a douche.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 10:30 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:30 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
Why not just claim the AP,Coaches,and BCS. You would still have the most and the rest of the football world would not be able to snicker at you. Bama doesn't need the 1932 weedwacker NC to prove your manhood.
I don't know. Doesn't really matter to me and I think it's fine to distinguish between pre-poll and poll-era championships.
I do know that those earlier pre-poll undefeated Rose Bowl teams (1925, 26, 30, and 34) were definitely viewed as national champions at the time. A lot of teams claim those in the same situation. I don't see why it's a big deal that Alabama claims them.
1941 is really the only outlier and head-scratcher since it was during the poll era (i.e., 1936-present) and Alabama was not the poll champion. All other championships recognized by Alabama were either (1) pre-poll undefeated Rose Bowl teams clearly recognized as national champions at the time or (2) poll champions.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:30 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
If you're counting the "My Weekly Reader" national titles, that award would go to Prinecton or Yale.
Pre-1910 titles don't count. It was a completely different game back then. All of the blue-blood programs except Michigan didn't become national powers until the 1920s.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 10:31 am to I-59 Tiger
One could be said to not be legit. Ridiculous statement to discredit the undefeated Rose Bowl NC's. Especially as many times as articles and trophy presentations have been posted during those years awarding Bama those titles.
Page 2 of 15
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News