Started By
Message
re: Nebraska no longer a core 8 blue blood….
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:07 pm to molardog1
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:07 pm to molardog1
quote:
By that metric there is only one blue blood
But 1 + 1 = 2.
Alabama - 1011-333-44
Michigan - 1017-360-36
Bama won't catch them this season, maybe next. Perhaps Michigan will have a really horrible season next year.
0
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:09 pm to molardog1
In the time since Notre Dame’s last natty, Nebraska has 3 of them. The Domers’ last title is almost as close our last one in 1939 than it is to present day.
A delusional fan base does not make you a Blue Blood.
A delusional fan base does not make you a Blue Blood.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:12 pm to molardog1
quote:
I bet you are fun at parties
Nothing fun about using AI to make your posts. All over the internet people just give AI a prompt and copy/paste everything onto some forum.
People can’t even be bothered to come up with their own troll posts anymore smh
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:19 pm to molardog1
quote:
Nebraska no longer a core 8 blue blood….
Don’t care,
Whether we’ve been considered by others “blue blood” or not hasn’t had one iota of impact these past 2 decades.
I’d just like to see some consistent winning and big meaningful games return. Do that and all the blue blood stuff will take care of itself.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:22 pm to molardog1
Georgia is the second most underachieving college football program of all time behind Texas.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:22 pm to Buckeyeholic
quote:
Check that. Bama officially at 982, just behind Ohio St. 987
Note. Michigan holds the lead with 1019, 32 more than OSU but started playing 11 years before OSU.
OSU and Alabama have better winning % than UM
I'm not sure which children's stat site you from which you are getting your info but you are being misled.
Here:
Michigan - 1018-361-36 73.22%
Alabama - 1011-333-44 74.42%
Ohio State - 999-335-53 73.94%
are the numbers.
Alabama possesses the best overall winning percentage of any team in college football, at this point.
Ohio State's #'s are nothing to be ashamed of at all. In fact, tomorrow, they will most likely join the 1000 win club.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:23 pm to molardog1
I can see it. UGA is just about there. Maybe 10 more years and an NC or two.
Gotta stop at Texas for blue bloods though, cuz they were flirting with getting the boot before Sark.
Gotta stop at Texas for blue bloods though, cuz they were flirting with getting the boot before Sark.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:35 pm to McNet
Texas isn't a blue blood...neither is Georgia. Hard to gain the status, even harder to lose it, but Nebraska probably has because they've been so bad and irrelevant for nearly 25 years.
1- Alabama
2- Ohio St
3- Oklahoma
4- Notre Dame
5- USC
Next tier...Nebraska, Michigan, Texas
Next tier...LSU, Penn St, Georgia, Tennessee and the 3 FL schools in some order.
1- Alabama
2- Ohio St
3- Oklahoma
4- Notre Dame
5- USC
Next tier...Nebraska, Michigan, Texas
Next tier...LSU, Penn St, Georgia, Tennessee and the 3 FL schools in some order.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:44 pm to molardog1
It's wild that Nebraska has spent a grand total of 7 weeks in the top 10 since joining B1G in 2011 and 3 of those weeks were in 2011 
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:48 pm to molardog1
AI told me yesterday that Kalen DeBoer was being considered for the UAB job.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 5:56 pm to Chad4Bama
quote:
Next tier...Nebraska, Michigan, Texas
No matter if Michigan are incessant cheaters, they have to be listed in the top tier of any listing. They just won a NC and have 12 altogether.
Add in the most wins of any college team and the 3rd highest winning percentage overall of any team and they are easily in the top 5 all time.
Maybe they are #2 all time. It's a close call as to who claims the #2 spot between Michigan and Ohio State.
OSU has 9 NC's and 3rd most overall wins, while holding a very slight win percentage advantage over Michigan in the totality of their games against all opponents.
OSU also has won more NC's recently, in 2002, '14, and '24. Michigan's last three were in 1948, '97, and '23.
It's seems like, all things considered, it would most likely be like this:
Alabama
Michigan
Ohio State
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:02 pm to cramps
quote:
The Cornhuskers are still arguably the most dominant CFB dynasty in my lifetime. They absolutely mauled teams.
Nebraska under Osborne always mauled everyone except Switzer, Miami, and FSU.
Here’s a breakdown of the number of times Nebraska scored at least 50 points from 1980-1993:
50-59: 25 times.
60-69: 12 times.
70-79: 4 times.
80-89: 1 time.
That’s 42 50+ point games in the 14 years leading up to the 1994-1997 dynasty.
Meanwhile. Miami won four national titles (and 3-0 against Nebraska with two shutouts) from 1980-1993 with the following breakdown:
50-59: 11 times.
60-69: 2 times.
70-79: 0 times.
80-89: 0 times.
That’s 13 50+ point games.
Maybe it’s accurate to say that Osborne always had a tendency to run the score up on (or “maul”) a bunch of shitty defenses. Even when he could barely score against the great Switzer, Miami, and FSU defenses, he still put up video game scores on most other teams. Nebraska only faced the Switzer, Miami, and FSU triumvirate once from 1994-1997 and just barely won. And that was Miami on the decline.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:35 pm to Chad4Bama
1. Ohio State
2. Alabama
3. Michigan
4. Notre Dame
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Texas
8. Georgia
9. Nebraska
10. Penn State
11.Tennessee
12. LSU
13. Miami
14. Florida State
15. Florida
16. Washington
2. Alabama
3. Michigan
4. Notre Dame
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Texas
8. Georgia
9. Nebraska
10. Penn State
11.Tennessee
12. LSU
13. Miami
14. Florida State
15. Florida
16. Washington
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:41 pm to McNet
quote:
1. Ohio State
2. Alabama
3. Michigan
Alabama has more wins, more NC's, a higher overall winning percentage, more bowl games, more bowl wins and their uniforms are nicer than than Ohio State's, yet you list Ohio State as 1st?
Things you say don't make sense.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:50 pm to Daowna
quote:
Nebraska no longer a core 8 blue blood
quote:
Oklahoma is next.
quote:
A&M fan
That 77-0 game still stuck in your craw, huh?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:33 pm to ScottLA
quote:
quote:
1. Ohio State
2. Alabama
3. Michigan
Alabama has more wins, more NC's, a higher overall winning percentage, more bowl games, more bowl wins and their uniforms are nicer than than Ohio State's, yet you list Ohio State as 1st?
Things you say don't make sense
Buckeye fan clubs and watch parties all over the world. No school really comes close to matching their following. Buckeyes everywhere. Rednecks to gangstees to yuppies to executives. Michigan is a bit more bougie and exclusive.
Alabama truly rules the South, Notre Dame with the Catholics, but Buckeyes are the better known program overall.
On field success is pretty much splitting hairs.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:44 pm to molardog1
There is no such thing as a "modern blue blood", and anyone using this term is a fricking retard.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:45 pm to molardog1
That’s cute that Georgia thinks they’re a Blue Blood.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:48 pm to Nitro Express
Nouveau Riche
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:50 pm to McNet
quote:
Buckeye fan clubs and watch parties all over the world. No school really comes close to matching their following.
Must be why the top tv ratings game usually involves Alabama on a weekly basis lol.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News