Started By
Message
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:57 am to memphisplaya
quote:
Who's lying? Dont answer that
quote:
It's also made in BR so you know it works better than our offense at least
but is it better than the defense that played against AU last fall
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:57 am to WDE24
At that matters at this point is that everybody with out a Mam Newton tattoo on their arse thinks Auburn cheated to win.
The Auburners will be defending that tainted trophy until the Cows come home (no pun intended)
The NCAA will hammer them hard for something unrelated* ...like what happened to OJ cause Karma be Bitchin.
*Do you really think AlerBama got all those severe punishments for the actual infraction..or was it simply payback for all the times they couldnt catch em?
The Auburners will be defending that tainted trophy until the Cows come home (no pun intended)
The NCAA will hammer them hard for something unrelated* ...like what happened to OJ cause Karma be Bitchin.
*Do you really think AlerBama got all those severe punishments for the actual infraction..or was it simply payback for all the times they couldnt catch em?
This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 10:59 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:58 am to mckibaj
If the NCAA had interpreted it's rules accordingly, no new rules would be needed. Cecil was given full authority to act on Cam's behalf. Cecil solicited money as an agent would. That should have made Cam ineligible alone and would take care of family members, or anyone else close to an athlete in the future if they acted in the same manner.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:59 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Again, you sure about that? might want to check your info
quote:
Rogers went on to say in the interview that he was the person who initiated contact with Cam Newton’s father Cecil and not the other way around. He said this occurred after Cam Newton left Florida under less than optimal circumstances: “And what I got in touch with him for is I help kids. I help kids get in school when a kid’s name go across the screen, uh, Brent Schaeffer from Tennessee, I helped him.”
Reading between the lines.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:59 am to Alahunter
This all aside there is still plenty surrounding whitehead, Reed, robinson, lemondude, dyer, and I'll throw in pike and westerman for good measure.
That ought to do the trick. Get the spray ready hunter!
That ought to do the trick. Get the spray ready hunter!
This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 10:59 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:59 am to Crow Pie
quote:Alahunter doesn't.
At that matters at this point is that everybody with out a Mam Newton tattoo on their arse thinks Auburn cheated to win.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:00 am to Crow Pie
quote:
Crow Pie
quality post, you bring so much to the SECr
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:00 am to WDE24
quote:
What if it is done without the kid's knowledge?
Nonfactor. A parent/kid usually are close and neither will snitch out the other.
quote:
Kid still loses his opportunity to play college ball?
Yes.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:00 am to mckibaj
quote:
So Auburn could solicit money to all of Alabama's recruits and not pay them but then they would all be inelgible
If Auburn is the parent or guardian of said recruit, then yes they should be inelgible.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:00 am to Alahunter
quote:
If the NCAA had interpreted it's rules accordingly, no new rules would be needed. Cecil was given full authority to act on Cam's behalf. Cecil solicited money as an agent would. That should have made Cam ineligible alone
He would be only ineligible at MSU, right?
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:01 am to Alahunter
quote:When? Before or after the solicitation had occurred?
Cecil was given full authority to act on Cam's behalf.
quote:Was he given authority to solicit money or was he acting outside the scope of the agency?
Cecil solicited money as an agent would.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:01 am to msu202020
quote:
msu202020
just saying he did not help him to blinn, as you stated.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:01 am to WDE24
quote:
Alahunter doesn't.
Apparently, neither does the gator poster from earlier on in the thread.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:02 am to AUnite
quote:
but is it better than the defense that played against AU last fall
Low blow
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:03 am to WDE24
quote:
When? Before or after the solicitation had occurred?
According to Cam, all the way back to Blinn College decision and immediately after.
quote:
Was he given authority to solicit money or was he acting outside the scope of the agency?
He was given full authority to make the decision of where he would attend. He's over 18. His dad became his agent at that point and anything his dad did, whether within the rules or outside of them should have made Cam culpable to them.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:03 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
just saying he did not help him to blinn, as you stated.
I think he did based of the quote, just my personal opinion on the matter.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:03 am to memphisplaya
quote:
memphisplaya
quote:
Pssssh that couldnt kill an ant. You need this
Damn skippy. I am a Bengal Dealer, that shite rocks!
This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 11:05 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:04 am to Alahunter
quote:That is not how agency works anywhere else in the US.
He was given full authority to make the decision of where he would attend. He's over 18. His dad became his agent at that point and anything his dad did, whether within the rules or outside of them should have made Cam culpable to them.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 11:05 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
quality post, you bring so much to the SEC
Somebody is tasked with bringing the truth to these intra-SEC Flametastic threads ....and that person is me.
Popular
Back to top


0







