Started By
Message
re: NCAA speaks about: "Cam Did not Know"
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:06 am to gatorrocks
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:06 am to gatorrocks
quote:
There really wasn't "any evidence" in the Bush case either was there?
Yes, there was mountains of evidence. Go read the NCAA report and you will be amazed that it took so long or the fact that he wasnt rulled inelligible while there.
0
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:07 am to AUnite
quote:
quit trolling Hunter
then he would never post.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:08 am to CherokeeTiger
This is still an issue? Wake me when something factual actually happens. Until then, neither Cam nor Cecil were paid.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:08 am to AUnite
quote:
quit trolling Brooks
FIFY
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:09 am to auburntiger77
I'm not gonna really get into this besides saying, Cam can deny all he wants, but honestly think about it. How could he have not known what his dad was doing? If he honestly and truly didn't know then sure, his dad did it on his own. But it's his DAD. And for how much they tout being so close to each other, I don't know how anyone can believe Cam was unaware of his Father's actions.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:09 am to gatordmb89
quote:
This is still an issue? Wake me when something factual actually happens. Until then, neither Cam nor Cecil were paid.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:10 am to auburntiger77
Doesnt matter 
the truth will come out in time!
the truth will come out in time! 
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:11 am to auburntiger77
quote:
Cam would still have been eligible.....
AU declared Cam ineligible wingnut.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:11 am to gatordmb89
Evidently it is. I couldn't agree with you more 
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:12 am to auburntiger77
I don't know if Cam was paid, or what happened, but it still doesn't seem fair to me.
For example, let's say a high profile player wants to go to Auburn, His dad solicits money from Auburn for his son's services. Auburn doesn't pay, then the high profile player goes to Alabama.
In this situation, Auburn is put at a disadvantage due to having to pay to secure the players services, while Alabama wasn't.
The NCAA needs to clean up this loop hole. In my opinion, the player should be supsended and nothing happen to either university.
If not, then a player can just have his parents solicit money from a school, if he gets turned down, then he can go to another school and play, also punishes the school that was solicited. There has to be reprecusions for this.
(Yes, I am mad that we didn't get Cam Newton
)
For example, let's say a high profile player wants to go to Auburn, His dad solicits money from Auburn for his son's services. Auburn doesn't pay, then the high profile player goes to Alabama.
In this situation, Auburn is put at a disadvantage due to having to pay to secure the players services, while Alabama wasn't.
The NCAA needs to clean up this loop hole. In my opinion, the player should be supsended and nothing happen to either university.
If not, then a player can just have his parents solicit money from a school, if he gets turned down, then he can go to another school and play, also punishes the school that was solicited. There has to be reprecusions for this.
(Yes, I am mad that we didn't get Cam Newton
)This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 10:18 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:13 am to AUnite
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:14 am to Brettesaurus Rex
quote:
I don't know how anyone can believe Cam was unaware of his Father's actions.
It doesn't really matter what anyone thinks. They have to have to prove Cam knew about it.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:15 am to auburntiger77
Of course the NCAA is going to defend their position.
And the "misunderstood issue" arose from their own by-laws indicating that Cam would be ineligible if a close contact solicited funds, gifts, etc.
The NCAA made several rulings last year (OSU in particular) based on $$$$ and nothing more. corrupt organization. I don't buy anything they say any more.
And the "misunderstood issue" arose from their own by-laws indicating that Cam would be ineligible if a close contact solicited funds, gifts, etc.
The NCAA made several rulings last year (OSU in particular) based on $$$$ and nothing more. corrupt organization. I don't buy anything they say any more.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:18 am to msu202020
quote:
it still doesn't seem fair to me.
Life isn't fair bucko, and if you think it's supposed to be...well you're in for a long, shitty ride in this game called life
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:19 am to crimsonsaint
quote:Just going above and beyond what was required to maintain the unblemished integrity of AUs compliance department. That is how AU's compliance handles these issues. Bama should take notes.
AU declared Cam ineligible wingnut.
This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 10:21 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:20 am to Thracken13
quote:
someone get the raid and spray AU77 please.
There's trouble brewing in the AU fambily.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:20 am to AUnite
quote:
Life isn't fair bucko
Truth. We're only guaranteed the pursuit of happiness. It doesn't mean you're gonna reach it.
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:21 am to auburntiger77
There is a 1500 page thread that says otherwise with quality posters like ILoveTheLord and bluetickhound.
This post was edited on 5/11/11 at 10:21 am
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:22 am to auburntiger77
In the words of Birdie, "It ain't over".
Posted on 5/11/11 at 10:23 am to AUnite
quote:
Life isn't fair bucko, and if you think it's supposed to be...well you're in for a long, shitty ride in this game called life
We are not talking about life, talking about College Football. If this loophole is left open, wait and see how it feels with the shoe on the other foot.
Page 2 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News