Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/16/23 at 7:56 pm to jimmarley
quote:
Kirby learned from lil Nicky.
Nothing about that program surprises me any more.
Hope their nattys are worth it when sanctions come. Will bowl cut retain his job?
You're just another satisfied jealous wart whose team probably had their ponderosas handed to them by the Dawgs.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the hate.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:06 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
No one involved was a recruit….good on the tRant to make shite up and blast when 2 young people are dead
Everyone here has been doing it for weeks regarding Brandon Miller.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:42 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
According to Dave Biddle, the editor of Bucknuts on 247Sports/CBS network and host of On The Money on 97.1 The Fan, Ohio State missed out on a 5-star recruit because of insufficient NIL funds, and Georgia offered the recruit significantly more.
I certainly trust the editor of salty Bucknuts. Sounds like a name you can trust.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 8:51 pm to jimmarley
quote:
Kirby learned from lil Nicky.
Nothing about that program surprises me any more.
Hope their nattys are worth it when sanctions come. Will bowl cut retain his job?
quote:
jimmarley
Melt.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 7:11 am to DawgsLife
Yeah, google is the worst. Too much manipulating of certain search results
Posted on 3/17/23 at 7:20 am to BLG
Suck on my threepeat bitch
Posted on 3/17/23 at 7:30 am to Hobnailboot
LOOK! Another UGA English Major.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 7:39 am to BLG
Meh, If this was 2000 I'd be nervous.
The NCAA hasn't "penalized" anybody since USC in 2010.
The NCAA hasn't "penalized" anybody since USC in 2010.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 7:53 am to TouchdownTony
quote:
Meh, If this was 2000 I'd be nervous.
The NCAA hasn't "penalized" anybody since USC in 2010.
The reality is all NCAA penalties where teams had to forfeit games, lose scholarships or not be able to play future games have been about players getting money from boosters.
And the reality is that is allowed now (what USC was hit with). NCAA investigations are still going to happen, but the penalties out of them will be a lower number of recruiting visits or other insignificant penalties. The one thing that made NCAA investigations something to fear (paying players) is now not something that is penalized.
This post was edited on 3/17/23 at 7:54 am
Posted on 3/17/23 at 8:06 am to Hobnailboot
quote:
Suck on my threepeat bitch
- William Shakespeare, The Tempest
Posted on 3/17/23 at 8:25 am to TexasTiger08
quote:
For the last month I’ve been told by gumps to not trust the media.
Most hypocritical bunch of posters here. They learned from the lead elf.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 8:44 am to BLG
Lots of specifics there from a highly respected source. 
Posted on 3/17/23 at 8:50 am to BowlJackson
quote:
She
Now I know you’re lying
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:19 am to HonorThyWarEagle
quote:
I don't like Bing's interface tbh, I was kidding about the "weird" part
Not a problem. I was just a bit confused. I quit Google because they took an active stance on some political issues. (Ftr, I don't make political stances an issue unless a company/person does.) Anyway...I was just wondering if you knew something I did not know. I actually preferred the results I got from Google, but when they made some stances I dumped them.
I guess I'll never understand why companies think they have to make public stances on political issues. Same for actors, musicians and other entertainers. I mean, they have a right to speak out if they want to, but why risk alienating a large portion of your fan base? Just hold your political beliefs close to the vest and exercise your right to vote. But if you try to sway me or start making public stances then If I disagree then I will quit going to your movies, listening to your music or supporting you in any way. Which is my right.
Posted on 3/17/23 at 10:32 am to DawgsLife
"But if you try to sway me or start making public stances then If I disagree then I will quit going to your movies, listening to your music or supporting you in any way. Which is my right."
Companies largely know this (less so for individual famous people).
The reality is that if they're making those political statements publicly, for their particular business there is a benefit to doing so and that benefit outweighs the costs of lost customers.
Businesses used to be very conservative in their politics. They're much less so now, moving to the point they're almost liberal. They're not doing this without reading the market first.
Without taking a side... it seems that the financial impact of happy/pissed off social liberals on a company's bottom line is in most businesses bigger than happy/pissed off conservatives. It' why the "mainstream" media (often viewed as liberal) gets advertising from major corporations where the more conservative media shows get advertising from "buy gold"/"my pillow" type sources despite great ratings.
Companies largely know this (less so for individual famous people).
The reality is that if they're making those political statements publicly, for their particular business there is a benefit to doing so and that benefit outweighs the costs of lost customers.
Businesses used to be very conservative in their politics. They're much less so now, moving to the point they're almost liberal. They're not doing this without reading the market first.
Without taking a side... it seems that the financial impact of happy/pissed off social liberals on a company's bottom line is in most businesses bigger than happy/pissed off conservatives. It' why the "mainstream" media (often viewed as liberal) gets advertising from major corporations where the more conservative media shows get advertising from "buy gold"/"my pillow" type sources despite great ratings.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News