Started By
Message
re: Mizzou should jump on a chance to leave the SEC.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:27 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:27 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Trying to hide under LSU's skirt because we own you now is pathetic.
Might want to beat Arkansas more than once every two decades before acting like you aren't our bitch.
quote:
But y'all hired a fat slob to be your new coach so no surprise here.
Fat Slob's résumé > Lucky Sumlin's
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:27 pm to AginAL
I like how A&M had....zero? or 1 NC claimed then they join the SEC and add some



Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:27 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Kilo...this thread has been very JUMBO. You sir, are JUMBO. Celebrations will occur throughout the month of January in your honor.
Is that what you're going with? Should I have said Nice Jumbo when I posted earlier instead of Nice Rut? I was just thinking of something to go with Antlers but Jumbo makes more sense.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:28 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
1. Yea Keenum was a bad arse QB. Not debatable. A bad arse QB that Sumlin inherited. He had to play a QB he "developed" once. Houston watched bowl season. In C-USA.
Very debatable actually ... He was nothing more than a Kliff Kingsbury, Sunny Cumbie, Graham Harrell. (Oh wait I am wrong one of those guys was actually drafted) Keenum was a pure product of the system.
quote:
2. Won 11 at A&M with another inherited star. John L would look like a good coach with JFF. Never won C-USA. C-USA.
You wish

quote:
3. Ok 2 conference titles. 2 > 0
3-1 in bowls > 2-4
Not to mention the fact that he beat multiple BCS teams with friggin HOUSTON. It isn't like he had a BCS level roster but he still beat BCS teams (and a couple of pretty good ones)
Oh and as far as his record in 2010 with the "one QB he developed" you mean his 3RD STRING QB?
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:28 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
National Championships:
A&M: 1
Arkansas: 1
Fixed
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:28 pm to Bottoms Up
the two we claimed are much more legit than half of the billion championships that alabama claims
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:29 pm to piggilicious
The only stat you have is head to head. You have largely avoided us in our better years. In about 20 years, you won't have that stat in your favor.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:29 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
we had more SWC championships than you before you left
15 to 13

This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:29 pm to Porker Face
quote:
National Championships:
A&M: 1
Arkansas: 1
That's the fair assessment and even an A&M fan knows that.
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:31 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
You have largely avoided us in our better years
Lol, we owned you in every decade except the 1940s
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:31 pm to Bottoms Up
Thank you, I'm all about being fair to other SEC teams

Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:32 pm to Porker Face
except we didnt play in the 90s when, you know, we were one of the winningest programs in the country throughout the decade
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:32 pm to Porker Face
Bama won it in 1964.
I can give you guys 1964, but there is not way in hell it is "fair" to give Arkansas credit for 1964 while also denying A&M credit for 1919 and 1927.
(Sorry...it was Bottom's Up who called the 1-1 NC thing a "fair assessment", not Porker Face. That's laughable, since it makes no sense to give Arkansas credit for 1964 while denying A&M credit for 1919 and 1927).
I can give you guys 1964, but there is not way in hell it is "fair" to give Arkansas credit for 1964 while also denying A&M credit for 1919 and 1927.
(Sorry...it was Bottom's Up who called the 1-1 NC thing a "fair assessment", not Porker Face. That's laughable, since it makes no sense to give Arkansas credit for 1964 while denying A&M credit for 1919 and 1927).
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:32 pm to kilo
quote:
The football is great but the culture in the South sucks and its history is tainted with cultural and societal black marks. Its a poor region that is generally under educated and underdeveloped.

quote:
Missouri should jump at any opportunity to align itself with states and Universities that are more on its level economically, culturally and academically.
How about we just push you instead?
quote:
Its about being among peers and most all the southern states and universities are not peers to Missouri or The University of Missouri and many fall woefully short of meeting that status.
You are a wanna-be, stuck up, yankee mofo
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:34 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
The only stat you have is head to head. You have largely avoided us in our better years. In about 20 years, you won't have that stat in your favor.

Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:34 pm to Porker Face
totally fair considering a&m went undefeated and unscored upon those years.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:35 pm to TheCheshireHog
I leave the thread thinking this is nothing but a thread for SEC fans to shite on Mizzou.
Then I come back to find an Arky/aTm flame war.
Just another day in the life of the SECr.
Then I come back to find an Arky/aTm flame war.
Just another day in the life of the SECr.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:36 pm to kilo
Vandy puts your school to shame in every aspect, has been our weakest collective sports team since the beginning and haven't once wanted to run away.
You northerners sure are pussies.
You northerners sure are pussies.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 4:36 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Bold indicates Hogs owned the decade
1920s
2-1 Hogs
1930s
4-2-1 Hogs
1940s
5-4-1 Aggy
1950s
5-4-1 Hogs
1960s
9-1 Hogs
1970s
6-4 Hogs
1980s
7-3 Hogs
1990s
0-2 Aggies
2000s
1-0 Hogs
2010s
2-1 Hogs
Notice something??
1920s
2-1 Hogs
1930s
4-2-1 Hogs
1940s
5-4-1 Aggy
1950s
5-4-1 Hogs
1960s
9-1 Hogs
1970s
6-4 Hogs
1980s
7-3 Hogs
1990s
0-2 Aggies
2000s
1-0 Hogs
2010s
2-1 Hogs
Notice something??
Back to top
