Started By
Message

re: Missourians, what do you consider yourselves?

Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
5868 posts
Posted on 8/17/19 at 9:42 pm to
The blessing and curse of being a border state.
Posted by DaBindahBaw
Member since Jul 2019
426 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 9:40 am to
Usually because of a certain segment of the population. You know, like people who need standards lowered for them to get “degrees” from special schools.
Posted by Mizzou19
Columbia
Member since Dec 2017
63 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 11:41 am to
Both, depends on where in the state your at.
Posted by bunkerhill
Georgia
Member since Oct 2017
1368 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

If the state didn't secede from the Union in the Civil war, then they are not Southern. That goes for Kentucky too. Doesn't mean they can't be in the SEC, but it means they aren't in what we call the "South". aka Dixieland.



Missouri furnished troops to both sides as did every state in the South except South Carolina. Numerous men from the northern states fought for the South.

Some of Missouri's most famous sons, the James boys, were definitely Southern. Harry Truman's family was Southern. His mother remembered that era of history and would not sleep in the Lincoln bedroom at the White House when she visited.

One of the most pro-Union parts of the South was East Tennessee.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13061 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 1:59 pm to
Missouri (1820-21) is an older state than Texas (1845).
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 2:02 pm to
I think "southern" is subjective. LA/MS differ slightly from AL/GA/N FL. Mizzou has a strong Midwest feel to it.
Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 8/18/19 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

One of the most pro-Union parts of the South was East Tennessee.


and Winston county, Alabama tried to secede from the state claiming "If a state has the right to secede from the Union, then a county has the right to secede from the state." That being said the state of Missouri did not secede during the civil war.
Edit: Further research I discovered I was both right and wrong about Missouri and secession.

quote:

During the American Civil War, the secession of Missouri was controversial because of the disputed status of the state of Missouri. During the war, Missouri was claimed by both the Union and the Confederacy, had two competing state governments, and sent representatives to both the United States Congress and the Confederate Congress. This unusual situation, which also existed to some degree in the states of Kentucky and Virginia (with West Virginia), was the result of events in early 1861.


quote:

In the town of Neosho, Missouri, Jackson called the state legislature into session. They enacted a secession ordinance, recognized by the Confederacy on October 30, 1861. So technically yes and no, the state governor and all the southern supporters did in fact secede and set up a government recognized by the south.
This post was edited on 8/18/19 at 3:46 pm
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter