Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Mateer vs Manning, wow!

Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:23 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28728 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:23 pm
I knew Manning hadn’t been great this year, but I was still a little shocked to see how close the numbers are here. Are these numbers right? SIAP

This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted by RockyRococco
Jacksonville FL
Member since Aug 2021
2240 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:26 pm to

bro what? that last name doing a lot for him huh
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
36003 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by Night Vision
33rd Level REC Member
Member since Feb 2018
25986 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:29 pm to
Do you have those in German?
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28728 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:31 pm to
I see your thread now

Sorry!

Either way it’s still probably worth a double post because those numbers are insane (in a bad way) to me
Posted by Rex Feral
Somewhere near Athens
Member since Jan 2014
17375 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:31 pm to
Mateer had decent numbers against UGA until you realize most of it came in the second half versus the 3rd and 4th string defense.
Posted by Night Vision
33rd Level REC Member
Member since Feb 2018
25986 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:31 pm to
It's all good.

Posted by cramps
Member since Oct 2012
2565 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:32 pm to
You left out the part about one having a burger named after him.
Posted by HogPharmer
Member since Jun 2022
4027 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:32 pm to
LINK

Now look at the strength of record.


Oh, and look at this too...

This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 2:33 pm
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
6931 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Now look at the strength of record.



The smooth brains on this site don't have the ability to critically think.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40711 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:04 pm to
Do these stats include the fumble 6?

Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5694 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:08 pm to
ESPN has Texas at #2 and Oklahoma at #3 for SOS
Sagarin has Texas at #2 and Oklahoma #5.

Looks pretty similar, just like their stats.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 3:09 pm
Posted by RockyRococco
Jacksonville FL
Member since Aug 2021
2240 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:08 pm to
My 33 year old balding arse could go 300 3/1 with texas's roster
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
6931 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

ESPN has Texas at #2 and Oklahoma at #3 for SOS
Sagarin has Texas at #2 and Oklahoma #5.

Looks pretty similar, just like their stats.


Exactly my initial point about "the smooth brains not being able to critically think".

Texas played tOSU and Tenn

OU played Michigan and Georgia.

While Georgia is on par with tOSU, Michigan (losses to Western Michigan and Iowa) is not close to Tenn.

There is a pretty large gap in difficulty in those 4 opponents, plus 2 of Mateers 3 turnovers against Georgia aren't included in said "stats".

Point being while they might be ranked close in SOS on paper, theirs a large gap in the real world.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted by Soonerd78
Member since Sep 2024
3563 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Mateer had decent numbers against UGA until you realize most of it came in the second half versus the 3rd and 4th string defense.

mid 3rd quarter OU was outgoing uga by 50 yards …. the turnovers were the killer . OUs defense was awesome until they tired out late in the game . Now saying Mateer was great or anything just saying the offense was moving the ball thru the air. Uga dline vs the rush is elite .
Posted by Sammobile
Hollywood South
Member since Jan 2009
22454 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 4:08 pm to
That last name is going to get a some GM fired
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5694 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 4:41 pm to
So you meant to point out that Texas and OU have very similar SOS as part of your overall point that their very similar passing statistics actually show that Mateer sucks but Arch doesn't..... You can claim there is a big gap in difficulty but it really isn't.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 5:37 pm
Posted by OKinTX21
Member since Sep 2024
729 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 4:44 pm to
He was 15/19 for 140 yards in the first half.

Doesn’t excuse the his gift for committing cataclysmic mistakes and nearly single-handedly torpedoing any hope for our season, but thought I’d provide more context that his passing stats were primarily achieved in the first half when it was very much Georgia’s first team defense.
Posted by OKinTX21
Member since Sep 2024
729 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 4:46 pm to
I think you missed the point. The stats Mateer put up weren’t as impactful, as evidenced by 2 losses (who cares about passing for a TD in garbage time?). That said, arch has a revamped running back room, and maybe the second best wr room in the country and is putting up stats where a debate like this is actually happening.
That’s disturbing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter