Started By
Message
re: Marshall AD Christian Spears releases statement on erroneous NY Times article, re: Bama
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:02 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:02 pm to Tuscaloosa
The New York Times spinning their liberal b.s. for their own agenda? Surely not. At least I know posters on this board don’t buy it because i notice how often that source is trashed here
This post was edited on 3/16/23 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:03 pm to Hogfan13
quote:
NY Times hasn't printed a true story in about 10 years.
10 years? That fish wrapper has been garbage for well over half of a century.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:07 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
Harry Rex Vonner

SOOOOOOOOOOOOEEEEEEEEEEEEYYYYYYYYY
Yay bald drunken sow!!!!!

Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:09 pm to Tuscaloosa
His daddy had an opportunity to identify which part was false reporting, but for some reason he didn't.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:09 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:10 pm to imjustafatkid
Instagram with 42 likes. That’s putting yourself out there big time. He must be innocent.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:13 pm to Cutty Sark
You’re not very good at this.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:15 pm to Tuscaloosa
So the kai kid was there and now bama has pulled marshall into the lies.
How would the NY Times print an article saying he was there if he wasn't. He stated he had a good source. The NY Times is reputable.
So some dumb a-hole associated with bama basketball told the reporter some stuff that wasn't true and sounded convincing enough to get it reported?
seems unlikely.
There's so much horseshite coming out of bama now it's hard to discern the truth anymore. maybe that's their plan.
One this is true though, miller delivered the murder weapon.
How would the NY Times print an article saying he was there if he wasn't. He stated he had a good source. The NY Times is reputable.
So some dumb a-hole associated with bama basketball told the reporter some stuff that wasn't true and sounded convincing enough to get it reported?
seems unlikely.
There's so much horseshite coming out of bama now it's hard to discern the truth anymore. maybe that's their plan.
One this is true though, miller delivered the murder weapon.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:15 pm to Tuscaloosa
I’d like to see Al.com and their 7 remaining employees sued out of existence.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:15 pm to Vidic
I’m so not good at it you felt the need to respond. I expect nothing less from anyone so morbidly obese and retarded that they hand select Alabama as their favorite university with absolutely no ties.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:19 pm to Cutty Sark
quote:
morbidly obese and retarded
Seriously. Do you think this is good material? When you’re setting yourself apart in a sea full of retards it’s pretty impressive
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:20 pm to JackieTreehorn
quote:
I’d like to see Al.com and their 7 remaining employees sued out of existence.
What would AL.com be sued for? They reported that the New York Times had an article about Spears being there.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:27 pm to Vidic
quote:
Seriously. Do you think this is good material?
Morbidly obese
Retarded
It’s not material, just relaying factual information.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 12:42 pm to imjustafatkid
Miller, Oats and now this scrub have all used some form of ‘heartbreaking’ in their comments in the past week. Do their pr folks not have any other keywords they can use?
Posted on 3/16/23 at 2:08 pm to Tuscaloosa
Update LINK

quote:
Nick Kelly
@_NickKelly
Inbox: Statement from attorney representing Kai Spears and his family
Posted on 3/16/23 at 2:19 pm to jatebe
NYT wouldn't report this unless they had a source so assuming the Spears family is telling the truth who told the NYT reporter that Spears was there? Was it a police officer? A family member? Who?
Posted on 3/16/23 at 3:20 pm to Prof
quote:
NYT wouldn't report this unless they had a source

Posted on 3/16/23 at 3:37 pm to Prof
quote:
NYT wouldn't report this unless they had a source so assuming the Spears family is telling the truth who told the NYT reporter that Spears was there?
The article says "an anonymous source" which is the cheapest way to print a lie because " we won't reveal our source". It could be some idiot on the Rant for all anyone knows. It's cowardly.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 3:45 pm to Tideroller
quote:
The article says "an anonymous source" which is the cheapest way to print a lie because " we won't reveal our source". It could be some idiot on the Rant for all anyone knows. It's cowardly.
On politics/opinion pieces, yes, because those are opinion pieces but in scenarios like this their editor would demand a source that could be verified internally because that insulates them from liability. Anonymous is for the benefit of the source but the writer, editor, and legal team would know who it is.
No major paper is going to print something like that without one. A source can lie to you or be wrong but I guarantee you there's one there. It would be very interesting to know who it is and what their role is.
Posted on 3/16/23 at 3:57 pm to GeauxNewUser
quote:
The NY Times is reputable.
They've got a reputation, all right.
Popular
Back to top
