Started By
Message
re: Lunardi's Latest Bracketology
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:42 am to bigpapamac
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:42 am to bigpapamac
quote:
I agree. An 11 would be the perfect scenario for us I think. Considering how there are maybe 6-7 elite teams this year and everybody else is capable of laying an egg any give basketball game.
An 11 or 12 would be our only shot at getting to the Sweet Sixteen. We are treading on thin ice as it is though, and dropping another seed line or two would mean losing some more games. I'd rather take care of business now and just get into the damn thing. That's progress at least.
0
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:43 am to bbap
quote:
I'm an LSU fan. i barely even follow Memphis (and only in basketball) so there goes that theory of yours.
So you are a Memphis fan in basketball but LSU fan in football? Bandwagon much?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:43 am to bigpapamac
quote:
Miss St a 9 seed
lolz
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:44 am to 1991UW
quote:
So you are a Memphis fan in basketball but LSU fan in football? Bandwagon much?
I'm an LSU fan in all sports first and foremost but i follow Memphis basketball somewhat since i was born and raised there. That is in no way the defiintion of a badwagon fan. Nice try though.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 9:45 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:44 am to TT9
The SEC could very well get five teams. There are now 37 at large teams as opposed to the 34 there were in past seasons. That means three more "bubble" teams will make it this year.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:48 am to bbap
quote:
That is in no way the defiintion of a badwagon fan.
Yes, you are a bad bandwagon fan.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:49 am to bigpapamac
Looks about right to me. Not much upside for the SEC, only downside. Bama and MSU can play themselves out but their are no other SEC teams that can play their way in. So five teams at the most for the SEC and at least three guaranteed.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:50 am to 1991UW
Not at all. i grew up on memphis baketball. But they dont get preference over my alma mater. anyone who cant comprehend that and thinks thats the definition of bandwagon isnt playing with a full deck. sorry to say that but its the truth.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:51 am to bona fide
quote:
So five teams at the most for the SEC and at least three guaranteed.
I agree with this. Although I don't see how Alabama and Miss St could both play their way out (somebody will get a pretty decent looking computer win Saturday) of it though so I expect four teams are "guaranteed" for the SEC, although there are clearly only three locks at the moment.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:53 am to bbap
quote:
Not at all. i grew up on memphis baketball. But they dont get preference over my alma mater. anyone who cant comprehend that and thinks thats the definition of bandwagon isnt playing with a full deck. sorry to say that but its the truth.
I was being completely sarcastic with that last comment... chill out. Did you even notice you spelled it "badwagon"?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:53 am to bigpapamac
How is it naive? That would give you a total of 20 wins, 9-7 in SEC, and 0 impressive wins. Are we now counting impressive losses? Why am I not surprised to hear this logic from Bama fans.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:54 am to 1991UW
quote:
I was being completely sarcastic with that last comment
oh. i missed that.
quote:yes but i just assumed it was a typo.
Did you even notice you spelled it "badwagon"?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:54 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
and 0 impressive wins.
bama has impressive wins already on their resume. to say they have 0 is going too far.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:54 am to ShreveportHog94
LOL, we would be a lock at 9-7.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:55 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Are we now counting impressive losses?
How long have you been following CBB? Impressive losses have carried weight for over two decades.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:58 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
I hope LSU can finish strong in the SEC and get in.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 9:59 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
0 impressive wins.
I'd say Wichita St isn't too bad of a win. they are a 5th seed. If I'm not mistaking.
The team now is a completely different animal without Green/Mitchell. We would have completely dominated LSU with Green/Mitchell. How we lost against USC I have no clue, awful loss.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 10:01 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:00 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
How is it naive?
quote:
That would give you a total of 20 wins, 9-7 in SEC, and 0 impressive wins. Are we now counting impressive losses?
That whole statement is naive too. At 9-7 in the SEC our RPI would likely be in the 30-35 range. O impressive wins? Lolz. Counting impressive losses? Welcome to college basketball 25 years ago.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:03 am to bona fide
Hahaha no they don't. They mean jack shite unless you're sitting in the damn room discussing them. Have you been in this room I speak of and heard them talk? No you haven't so STFU. All you have proven is you can't beat any good teams, you can only hang around for a bit. Not saying Bams doesn't make it in either but they have work to do.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 10:04 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
ShreveportHog94
Lunardi's Latest Bracketology
Hahaha no they don't. They mean jack shite unless you're sitting in the damn room discussing them. Have you been in this room I speak of and heard them talk? No you haven't so STFU. All you have proven is you can't beat any good teams, you can only hang around for a bit. Not saying Bams doesn't make it in either but they have work to do
And where is Arkansas going to be in the Tourney? Just wondering...
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News