| Favorite team: | Washington  |
| Location: | Seattle, WA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 303 |
| Registered on: | 2/2/2012 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Bracket/Bubble Projections Feb. 27-28 - Updated w/CBS bracket, ESPN Bubble Watch
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 10:25 am
UConn is in? I guess that's all they need to have a deep tourney run cuz the refs do the rest.
1
re: Bracket/Bubble Projections Feb. 27-28 - Updated w/CBS bracket, ESPN Bubble Watch
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 9:49 am
Hopefully Washington is an 11 or 12 seed.
re: Which would you prefer?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 9:08 am
quote:
So, so much mad and stupid jam-packed into 300 posts
Oregon is who is mad, not Washington.
re: Which would you prefer?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am
quote:
UW is just terrible.
Not as terrible as Auburn before they started paying $200,000 for recruits.
re: Which would you prefer?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 8:46 am
quote:
FWIW, I thought he was, and is, a really good QB. And I am counting on your former offensive coordinator, currently OUR new offensive coordinator, to develop QB's in Tuscaloosa like he did Jake up there.
He was good but most of the credit still goes to Sark... who actually calls the plays.
re: Which would you prefer?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 8:30 am
quote:
While I agree with you that he is, I also agree with his post. RG3 is no vick yet, and wilson and murray are no Luck.
Although I really am surprised he didnt bring up Locker.
Yep, because Locker has sucked in the NFL with his 99.4 QB Rating.
re: Its going to be a blast...
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 7:05 am
quote:
With an easy arse OOC schedule
I hope your team thinks Washington will be easy as well...
re: Which would you prefer?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 6:43 am
quote:
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
LOL @ putting RGIII in the same class as Vick and Murray and Wilson in the same class as Luck.
re: Tennessee @ LSU: Wednesday Night 8pm
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 3:35 am
2 teams that are on the NIT bubble... YAY
re: Bubble games: February 25th edition
Posted by 1991UW on 2/27/12 at 3:10 am
quote:
I think the Pac 12 may get three in, (Cal, Wash and Arizona) but probably only deserve 1.
LSU and ARK both have more top 50 wins than anyone in the Pac 12.
Truly weakest major conference. Wichita State would dominate that league this year.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH
re: ESPN Bracket Projections
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:25 pm
Pac-12 will get Cal, UW and Zona in. Maybe one more if another team wins the tourney.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:15 pm
quote:
Michigan has more wins but played more games
No doubt up until Rich Rod Michigan went to a bowl game a gazillion years in a row
Michigan really likes to lose in the Rose Bowl though... they haven't done so well there in a long time.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:09 pm
quote:
1. Michigan: 888-306-38
2. Texas: 853-326-34
3. Notre Dame: 845-296-42
4. Nebraska: 836-345-41
5. Ohio State: 825-315-53
6. Alabama: 825-317-43
All time wins<<<<<Major Bowl Wins/"National Titles"
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:05 pm
quote:
thats not an opinion, thats a rule change (which was made by someone or a group of peoples opinion). An opinion would be them voting for the wild card teams.
lets just let all the teams in the playoffs then... clearly no opinion was involved in that decision.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:04 pm
quote:
Which CFB program is greater historically: Michigan or Alabama?
Alabama and it's not even close. Michigan is not even close to being a powerhouse since the 1950s.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 4:02 pm
quote:
then how does their playoff involve opinion?
opinion on how many teams to let in.... 8 to 10 now.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 3:59 pm
quote:
hmmm. Wasnt aware that baseball had a slection committee. Interesting.
Never said it did.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 3:56 pm
quote:
So you're just arguing for one set of opinions over another. got it.
Yep. Which is why the MLB Playoffs is expanding to 10 teams.. opinion.
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 3:53 pm
quote:
And opinion manages to creep in again!
Opinion is in every playoff system...
re: Which CFB program is greater historically: Arkansas or West Virginia?
Posted by 1991UW on 2/26/12 at 3:46 pm
quote:
who's to say the first or second team left out wouldn't have won it all then? At what point within your logic do championships no longer become mythical, and why?
Because the first or second team left out likely lost to some random scrub team and don't deserve to be in... since they are not in a power conference. How often is there 3 undefeated Non-BCS schools?
And I also think the NBA playoff system is a joke... because it makes the regular season meaningless.
Popular
24
