Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/8/24 at 10:59 am to RandySavage
quote:
Saban is gone, no one gives a frick about watching Alabama anymore.
I dislike Bama as much as most SEC fans, but to suggest they no longer move the needle is comical. They move the needle way more than most and certainly more than SMU.
Bama has a much better chance of winning versus good competition than SMU or Indiana. The rankings of those two teams have been a joke given their competition, but the committee put themselves in this spot and neither of those teams will be competitive in the playoffs. Bama can realistically beat any team and win it all.
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 11:00 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:00 am to bamabenny
The committee will only have to listen to Bama fans cry if they are left out. If they put them over SMU then they have a nation to listen to.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:01 am to bamabenny
quote:
Ratings wise, the first option is suicide for ESPN
I’d watch an exciting offense like SMU any day over a Bama that scored 3 points on a trash OU
This post was edited on 12/8/24 at 11:02 am
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:01 am to RandySavage
Didn't get to roll the toilet paper tree much this year, eh Randy?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:02 am to bamabenny
Conference title games will be alive and well in the B10 and SEC with our top 2 teams always in and both fighting for a bye.
Who cares if the ACC and B12 title games have some drama? Those should be winner take all elimination games in weak 1 bid conferences. The champion of both isn’t even ranked in the top 12. Why are we crying that their #2 gets left out?
Who cares if the ACC and B12 title games have some drama? Those should be winner take all elimination games in weak 1 bid conferences. The champion of both isn’t even ranked in the top 12. Why are we crying that their #2 gets left out?
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:06 am to bamabenny
quote:
Bama in: completely kills conference championship games
Conference championships were killed in 2011 when you cocksuckers didn’t even win the division but were still allowed to play in a national championship game.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:08 am to grizzlylongcut
You might want to have a doctor to look at that 13 year butt hurt, corn dog.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:10 am to bamabenny
Nope.
Not a lose/lose at all.
Reward teams that play for their conference championship.
Don’t reward teams that lose multiple games to teams that are barely bowl eligible.
Not a lose/lose at all.
Reward teams that play for their conference championship.
Don’t reward teams that lose multiple games to teams that are barely bowl eligible.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:18 am to tide06
ok so Bama wins the TV viewing championship, congrats!
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:20 am to SECdragonmaster
The bottom line is SMU being ranked #8 put the committee in an impossible situation. If they had ranked them properly then this would not be a discussion. They should have been no higher than #13 prior to the ACC Champ game.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:20 am to bamabenny
quote:
Yeah, yeah Bama lost to OU yadda yadda yadda
SMU in: all the matters is your W-L record if you’re in a P4 conference. The SEC will not be moving to a 9 game conference slate and you can guarantee big OOC matchups will start disappearing for more Mercer type games.
Bama in: completely kills conference championship games, especially for ACC and B12. Teams would possibly opt out of them if possible.
Ratings wise, the first option is suicide for ESPN but probably the “right” thing to do, and the way I expect it to go.
They put themselves in a heck of a mess with some laughable weekly rankings leading up to yesterday.
That Yadda yadda is a pretty big deal my dude. Also no, by letting SMU in they are still keeping conference championships relevant. If they penalized the loser then conferences would ditch it
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:21 am to UAinSOUTHAL
quote:
The bottom line is SMU being ranked #8 put the committee in an impossible situation. If they had ranked them properly then this would not be a discussion. They should have been no higher than #13 prior to the ACC Champ game.
if they would have ranked bama properly after having been beat by 21 against OU then this also wouldn't be an issue
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:31 am to BamaJerky
quote:
You might want to have a doctor to look at that 13 year butt hurt, corn dog.
Only a retarded Alabama fan would believe that they should get the benefit for not even participating.
Posted on 12/8/24 at 11:33 am to bamabenny
Brah, Bama killed the SECCG years ago.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News