re: "Let's take 'em to the deep end and let's see'em tap out."

quote:

---

I fricking love this shite.

---

Clearly.

17 pages. 3 more. You have no choice. Do it.

quote:

---

I'm not sure where "70 games played" is supposed to mean anything here.

---

Many games were played, and since the analysis is of every game played, your insecure cherry picking is irrelevant.

quote:

---

You ain't as good as you think you are.

---

We are as good as our overall record and accomplishments say we are, which means we are objectively better than you think we are.

quote:

---

4,5,10,20,25 are all standard analysis points for CFB.

"Before / After" major events are also reasonable analysis points for CFB.

They remain 2 very good reasons to do 21-25, and the relevant facts prove you wrong.

Your insecurity overload doesnt change that reality.

---

I don't think you know what standard analysis points are, and your actual reasons are pretty clear.

You claim to be comparing 2 teams recent history but leave out a previous year because it favors one of the teams. Not a gap year with some other team or anything remotely like that. Just cut off.

Then you make up lame excuses like this shite and claim people are insecure for pointing out your obvious dishonesty.

Piss off.

quote:

---

Nonetheless, its reasonable to do 5 year comparisons, and the numbers in the comparisons prove you wrong.

Things have clearly changed since COVID no matter how much you want to be insecure about it.

---

Yeah whatever, have fun with it. Again, you claim to be comparing the history of 2 recent teams and yet you want to ignore the previous season one of the teams had success in because you don't like the results.

I got better shite to do. Enjoy your fantasy.

All the numbers prove UGA 2021-25 is a Powerhouse. There is no reasonable way to spin it otherwise, as you continue to prove.

If we can win 3 more games in 2025, you can officially call UGA 2021-25 a Dynasty, which might take your insecurity to terminal levels.

quote:

---

2020 is in the current decade. You don't want to include 2020 because you don't want to count 2 more championships for Alabama.

---

The first year of a decade is typically considered to be the year ending in 1. For example, the current decade started in 2021 and will end in 2030.

quote:

---

And for the record, 5 is not a standard analysis point. Analysis points depend on context and the speed of change in what is being analyzed. It may be common for humans to think in terms of 5 and 10 because we have 5 fingers, that's all it means.

---

An analysis point is a specific location within a system or data flow where data is examined, allowing for insights and transformations to be applied.

Actually Analysis points can begin and end at whatever point a person chooses. You use nice pretty words, but they do not typically mean you know what you are talking about.

quote:

---

But at the end of the day you picked the number to exclude the stats from the 6th year.

---

Not if this is where he said this decade. As proven above the decade begins in the first year ending in 1. Which is 2021, NOT 2020.

quote:

---

And you still have a losing record to Alabama during that time.

---

And as i have pointed out to you and other Alabama fans many times and you want to dispute...Alabama fans used to celebrate titles now all you guys want to talk about is beating Georgia, forgetting that Georgia just won the SECCG and has two National Championships since Alabama's last one.

And right on cue, you bring up, "Alabama has a winning record against Georgia, during that time!"

3down10 for 17 pages now:

quote:

---

3down10 for 17 pages now:

---

17 pages of Georgia fans seeking validation from an Alabama fan.

17 pages. You hooked the biggest carp in the lake. You gonna cut the line or just play him till he dies.