Started By
Message
re: Keep Pushing
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:20 pm to BigSneezy
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:20 pm to BigSneezy
quote:
All A&M is saying is go ahead, let’s go nuclear and start over for everyone. We will still win under the new NIL legislation.
Jimbo would go down with everyone else and he knows it. Why he is all bark and no bite. If he actually had anything that would not incriminate himself he would turn it in. The only reason he has firsthand knowledge he because is as guilty as everyone else.
Posters like you are so naive to believe Jimbo is clean.
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 8:27 pm
0
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:20 pm to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Harvard 2. Texas ($42.2B) 3. Yale 4. Stanford 5. MIT 6. Penn 7. Notre Dame 8. Texas Jr ($18B)
Just so you know the endowment cannot legally be spend on athletics. All spending on athletics must come from the budgets of the athletic (non academic) department.
Also most of that budget difference supports UTMB which is the main medical branch around major cities in Texas.
Comparing athletics budgets revenue we are much closer. And comparing athletic budgets PROFIT we are ahead of UT.
Feel free to look it up. This why Texas left the Big12 and abandoned their own network, because financially we are kicking their arse.
It will be much closer once Texas gets into the conference.
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 8:31 pm
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:22 pm to BigSneezy
quote:Good. Then we can start over with cfb of the 70's and it's rules.
We will blow up the whole damn place.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:34 pm to MurphyGator
quote:
Then why do they have so much trouble getting money for facilities upgrades?
Because UT's woke administration doesn't give a shite about football or athletics in general. It's not so much about how much you have as it is how much you're willing to spend. UT could have out spent Bama ten times over for Saban to become their head coach. Bama alumni just care about football more and are willing to spend what it takes. That's why they will ultimately surpass both A&M and UT in NIL.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:43 pm to Imber
quote:
Because UT's woke administration doesn't give a shite about football or athletics in general. It's not so much about how much you have as it is how much you're willing to spend. UT could have out spent Bama ten times over for Saban to become their head coach. Bama alumni just care about football more and are willing to spend what it takes. That's why they will ultimately surpass both A&M and UT in NIL.
Respectfully, this is way off base. Texas spends more than most other programs on football. So much so, they run a deficit.
And no, UT can’t spend it. They manage money very poorly and their donors are very flaky.
They have a large endowment but that can’t be spent on football. A&M donors outspend Texas in spades.
We built nearly a billion dollar stadium and paid for it in cash in 7 years. Cash. From donors.
Show me another school whose donors donate nearly 150 million every year. That’s just from donors.
That’s pretty damn strong.
This post was edited on 5/20/22 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 5/20/22 at 8:44 pm to BigSneezy
Slimy big oil Texas scum bags ruining the environment and now college football.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 9:19 pm to BigSneezy
Who gives a damn. You’d think with all that money you could have won something by now.
Posted on 5/20/22 at 9:32 pm to BigSneezy
quote:
see who gets back on top first
You have to have previously been on top before you can get back on top.
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News