Started By
Message
Josh Pate post Spring top 20
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:34 am
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:34 am
Very controversial. Ohio St low, Clemson 1 and OU 10th. He loves OU and thinks they are a dark horse title pick
17
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:36 am to dallastiger55
quote:
He loves OU and thinks they are a dark horse title pick
There is always at least one.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:39 am to LSU Patrick
Being ranked top 10 on some moron’s clickbait rankings in May will be the highlight of Oklahoma’s season. Soak it in Sooners, it’s all downhill from here
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:40 am to mouse_cop
He also has Mateer as his Heisman winner so I’m guessing that’s the reason
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:58 am to dallastiger55
Every team on that list is just one position of need injury away from being a 5 win team
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:02 am to bamabaseballsec
Which is why I think uga bama Tex and osu are the favorites, everyone is lacking depth in the portal era these schools have the most(not saying lsu Penn st or Clem or someone with a solid starting core returning, can’t win it, I’d just have to see whose healthy at years end before I put any stock in anyone outside those 4)
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:11 am to bamabaseballsec
He’s also big on returning production. FYI, the top 4 teams in returning production for 2024 all had worse records, including #1 Ok State that went from 10-2 to 3-9
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:14 am to dallastiger55
I think we are good but not great but agree with the post above that nobody really seems to be dominantly great anymore.
I was not a Quinn fan and wish Sark would have given Arch more repos because the idea that he's just going to step in with very little experience and lead this team to a conference or national championship seems overly rosy and just a buy in to the hype of the name.
I'd love to be wrong.
I was not a Quinn fan and wish Sark would have given Arch more repos because the idea that he's just going to step in with very little experience and lead this team to a conference or national championship seems overly rosy and just a buy in to the hype of the name.
I'd love to be wrong.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:14 am to dallastiger55
Looks a lot like the preseason NFL talent matrix someone posted earlier.
Its all just offseason talkshow fodder until we see who has a QB and who doesnt.
Its all just offseason talkshow fodder until we see who has a QB and who doesnt.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:15 am to Mexican Martini
If Arch is elite you will be playing for the SECCG, if not you probably wont.
Ewers being average cost you a NC last year IMO.
Ewers being average cost you a NC last year IMO.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:18 am to tide06
quote:
Back to top
If Arch is elite you will be playing for the SECCG, if not you probably wont.
Ewers being average cost you a NC last year IMO.
Agree.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:19 am to dallastiger55
Putting Florida and Oklahoma ahead of UGA is bold. I'll need to see it first.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:20 am to dallastiger55
No Auburn? List is shite
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:30 am to LSU Patrick
They’re loaded man. I hate OU, but historically they are a great program. We don’t give them enough credit, but for some reason give UT all the credit they don’t deserve. OU has beat their arse the last 25 years, had more heisman winners and went to the CFP more than anyone from the SEC not named Alabama. When OU gets rolling they will be a very very tough opponent, not Texas
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:45 am to RTRnFlorida
quote:
They’re loaded man. I hate OU, but historically they are a great program. We don’t give them enough credit, but for some reason give UT all the credit they don’t deserve. OU has beat their arse the last 25 years, had more heisman winners and went to the CFP more than anyone from the SEC not named Alabama. When OU gets rolling they will be a very very tough opponent, not Texas
A quick view of your history shows you hate Texas and suck OU off in almost every post. Glad your post has no personal feelings attached lol.
With the portal and NIL it’s a new era. You can’t judge a team for the next 10 years based on what they did in the past 25/30 years. USC, Nebraska, Wisconsin and others will have a tough time in the new world keeping up
This post was edited on 5/12/25 at 10:47 am
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:47 am to dallastiger55
quote:
A quick view of your history shows you suck OU off in almost every post
quote:
dallastiger55
*spiderman gif*
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:51 am to dallastiger55
If the Texas QB last name was Lanning, I wonder where they would be ranked pre-season after failing to throw a single pass in the 2nd half of the previous season with an almost entirely new OL, WR and TE group.
Marketing 101
Marketing 101
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:14 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
No Auburn? List is shite
That list is shite regardless of whether we are in it or not. Looks like it was made by a third grader.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:15 am to dallastiger55
Josh Pate is a hack and I cant care less.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:16 am to dallastiger55
So a team that historically, even the last 5-10 years who is a top CFB program will suck …and tell me again why?
I’ve hated OU ever since the throttling they gave us in the sugar bowl. We’ve seen with the Aggies that money doesn’t buy you championships. I think good solid programs with deep foundations and great history do, and make no mistake, Oklahoma has money and Billionaire alumni than Bama and LSU combined.
You just suck Texas tranny vagina. That’s what it is and you don’t give credit where it’s due.
I’ve hated OU ever since the throttling they gave us in the sugar bowl. We’ve seen with the Aggies that money doesn’t buy you championships. I think good solid programs with deep foundations and great history do, and make no mistake, Oklahoma has money and Billionaire alumni than Bama and LSU combined.
You just suck Texas tranny vagina. That’s what it is and you don’t give credit where it’s due.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News