Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:48 pm to Slippery Slope
The '09 State team had much more talent compared to the '12 Vandy team. You can't argue that.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:49 pm to Mullen3:16
quote:
Posted by Message
Mullen3:16
whats so funny?
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:50 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
You can't argue that.
you actually can
Most of our players in 2009 were young or experienced and had been shite up until they had a real coach.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:50 pm to oklahogjr
I can't believe you disgraced Ned Stark's head with that choker. 
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:51 pm to NIH
quote:The ranked team you beat was #25 Ole Miss.. the last ranked team out there.
Mullen won more SEC games than Franklin did in his 1st year. He even beat a ranked team. His biggest problem was a tough OOC schedule or we easily go 7-5.
Mullen also inherited more talent. 08 MSU went 4-8 while '10 Vandy went 2-10.
I'll give you the tough OOC but assuming you keep 1 of GT or Houston (both of your OOC losses that year) on the schedule you go 6-6 at best.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:51 pm to NIH
Chizik
Franklin
Croom
Mullen
Franklin
Croom
Mullen
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:52 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Yes I can. The decent players we had sucked before Dan got there. The talent we had wasn't realized until after the season.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:52 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
trolled!!!1 lol
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:53 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
Had he called a run/pass option play to the player's strong side (right) then the QB could have either a) scored, b) completed a pass for a score, or c) thrown the ball away giving MSU another down to try to win.
Only if they had gone for and converted a two point play. You re stretching it by saying for the win.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:53 pm to Rig
quote:
08 MSU went 4-8 while '10 Vandy went 2-1
what a huge gap.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:55 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
whats so funny?
For starters, you are bat shite crazy if you believe John L. and Mullen are even near the same level.
quote:
Mullen has benefited from there being 3 strong teams in the west for the last couple of years. Makes him look better by association and cover up a piss poor record against the other teams except ole miss.
The fact that you think this is an advantage is delusional.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:56 pm to NIH
2 wins is considered a pretty big gap between 6-6 and 8-4. I'll hold the same standards for 4-8 and 2-10.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:57 pm to Rig
quote:
2 wins is considered a pretty big gap between 6-6 and 8-4
The problem with that is the two wins above six mean a higher bowl and the more likely that your team beat a big time program or two.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:58 pm to NIH
quote:
what a huge gap.
It is. Would you have considered us as bad as we are now had we beaten Vandy and BYU last year?
Posted on 7/18/12 at 5:58 pm to Mullen3:16
franklin without a doubt
Posted on 7/18/12 at 6:00 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
It is. Would you have considered us as bad as we are now had we beaten Vandy and BYU last year?
You just proved his point. Y'all were terrible last year. If you had won those two games, you would have still been terrible.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 6:01 pm to NIH
quote:
The problem with that is the two wins above six mean a higher bowl and the more likely that your team beat a big time program or two.
Ratio wise it's the equivalent of 27 MLB games to a MLB season.
Posted on 7/18/12 at 6:01 pm to Mullen3:16
quote:
The fact that you think this is an advantage is delusional.
You calling someone delusional
Posted on 7/18/12 at 6:02 pm to Henry Jones Jr
yes, terrible is terrible. I didn't feel we were close to average in 2008, I thought we were fricking terrible.
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News