Started By
Message
re: It’s Thursday and Auburn is still whining about last Saturday
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:20 pm to AHM21
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:20 pm to AHM21
I think the reason Auburn fans are taking this SO badly is because of what they saw not from Oklahoma’s offense but from their own.
Auburn fans realize they still don’t have a quarterback and more losses are on the horizon.
It is a shame too because they have 3 NFL level receivers. If Sackson keeps throwing the ball up for grabs like he did Saturday he may have a Lagway type game before its over.
Auburn fans realize they still don’t have a quarterback and more losses are on the horizon.
It is a shame too because they have 3 NFL level receivers. If Sackson keeps throwing the ball up for grabs like he did Saturday he may have a Lagway type game before its over.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:22 pm to captdalton
quote:
I think
Yeah no one on this forum is falling for that.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:25 pm to AHM21
quote:
We’re paying attention to everything Auburn says and does because our lives are empty and meaningless without the uninterrupted attention we give to Auburn.
FIFY
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:29 pm to jangalang
"A1 leaves the field of play during a down. Team A huddles with 10 players. Substitute A12 enters, and A2 simulates leaving the field but sets near the sideline for a “hide-out’’ pass. RULING: Penalty—15 yards from the previous spot. "
None of this happened.
None of this happened.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:31 pm to BoCam2
I know Sackson is not a very good quarterback or decisive decision maker. His rankings in a number of stats prove it. Sackson’s current rank among SEC quarterbacks.
Yards: 12th
Comp %: 6th
Touchdowns: 11th
Yards per attempt: 13th
Yards per game: 13th
Rating: 13th
After Oklahoma, his rushing stats don’t look too great either. He has 181 total yards, 45 yards per game, at a 3.3 yard average per carry.
Yards: 12th
Comp %: 6th
Touchdowns: 11th
Yards per attempt: 13th
Yards per game: 13th
Rating: 13th
After Oklahoma, his rushing stats don’t look too great either. He has 181 total yards, 45 yards per game, at a 3.3 yard average per carry.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:31 pm to FootballFrenzy
It could really happen if you pop'em in the azz.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:33 pm to CharlotteSooner
Did you read:
quote:
No simulated replacements or substitutions may be used to confuse opponents… No tactic associated with substitutes or the substitution process may be used to confuse opponents… This includes any hideout tactic with or without a substitution…
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:33 pm to captdalton
quote:
I know
Even worse
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:42 pm to JacieNY
You know now Auburn is going to soak the field when you play them next.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:43 pm to JEC119
They have one coming alright!
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:49 pm to jangalang
quote:
This includes any hideout tactic with or without a substitution…
Ok, define what that means.
The poster above gave an example of what would constitute a violation of the rules.
Tell us what exactly constitutes a “hideout tactic”.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:52 pm to jangalang
quote:
Did you read:
quote:
No simulated replacements or substitutions may be used to confuse opponents… No tactic associated with substitutes or the substitution process may be used to confuse opponents… This includes any hideout tactic with or without a substitution…
Yes, I've watched it several times now, and there was zero simulated substitution. A WR walking out to his position and lining up isn't a simulated substitution just because he's walking and the other team isn't paying attention. Nobody else on the offense was lined up either. He just walked out there and lined up while the rest of the offense was doing the same and he never once made any gesture that he was leaving the field. And I don't think the SEC office could even make the case anymore with the actual video.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:58 pm to captdalton
quote:
The poster above gave an example of what would consistent a violation of the rules.
That was the appendix to the rulebook that gave an example.
quote:
Tell us what exactly constitutes a “hideout tactic”.
Rulebook already did.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 12:59 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Yes, I've watched it several times now, and there was zero simulated substitution.
Lying to yourself for comfort is one thing.
But lying to me is white dog shite.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:04 pm to jangalang
quote:
Rulebook already did.
Why don’t you go ahead and post it here. If the rule clearly and quantitatively states that what the Oklahoma player was illegal it will only strengthen your argument.
The only reason not to is if it hurts your argument.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:04 pm to captdalton
quote:
Why don’t you go ahead and post it here.
Already shared it.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:20 pm to AHM21
That is a loser philosophy to be pissed about anything beyond the weekend it happened. OU still may very well have won. We will never know.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:23 pm to jangalang
I don't have any reason to lie. We won.
Your refusal to consider other viewpoints is your problem.
Your refusal to consider other viewpoints is your problem.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:25 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
I don't have any reason to lie. We won.
Illegitimately and numerous non Auburn fans called you on it for cheating.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 1:25 pm to jangalang
quote:
Already shared it.
All you shared was a “know it when you see it” rule. I want something quantitative like the poster shared above.
What exactly constitutes a hideout play?
Popular
Back to top


1




