Started By
Message

re: It has been been 50 years since our last NC in Football AND

Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 am to
Posted by Hog Springs
I'm on a boat
Member since Nov 2010
4436 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 am to
swamp mongrel
Posted by crimson crazy
Member since Oct 2008
20770 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:13 am to
Well fellas, I'm headed to bed. Y'all have a great night.
Posted by bamaboy87
Member since Jan 2009
15191 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:14 am to
Later CC
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86998 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:15 am to
Goodnight skid marks


Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 11:12 am to
Crazy, think this guy really believes half the shite he posts?

Yes, I believe he does believe despite evidence. I would hesitate to believe he likely believes in the Kennedy conspiracy and Bush blew up the levees in NO! ...some people just believe in revisionist theories!
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73220 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Having a trophy in a museum won't change how every historical football source views 1964.



So, poll titles don't mean anything now?
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73220 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

if you get 66 you also have to give back that one in the 70s when you lost at home to USC and still edged them out in one of the polls



Both Alabama and USC were one loss teams in 1978.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36999 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:17 pm to
if you have an identical record... and lost heads up (on your home field)... you should not be ranked ahead of that team IMO

USC got screwed on that one
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57010 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Having a trophy in a museum won't change how every historical football source views 1964.





So, poll titles don't mean anything now?


Wait did he really say every historical source views the 64' title as arky's?

Again, as a few said early on in the thread. Back then, the bowl games were exibition games, not taken as serious as today or a few years later when they did use the bowl games as a national champion qualifier.

Outside of the Arky region who did the national media deem the national champ? Hmmmmm
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73220 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

if you have an identical record... and lost heads up (on your home field)... you should not be ranked ahead of that team IMO

USC got screwed on that one



Alabama was ranked #1 when #7 USC beat them in September. USC would then lose to an un-ranked Arizona State team in October. Alabama won out. That's the difference in this ordeal.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36999 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:21 pm to
that's why it happened... but it should not have happened

the pollsters just made a mistake IMO

when the records are identical you just have to go with the heads up matchup IMO (esp when the home team loses)
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
73220 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Wait did he really say every historical source views the 64' title as arky's?

Again, as a few said early on in the thread. Back then, the bowl games were exibition games, not taken as serious as today or a few years later when they did use the bowl games as a national champion qualifier.

Outside of the Arky region who did the national media deem the national champ? Hmmmmm


That's where Hog fans get completely out of whack in this discussion. I don't think most people are saying they don't deserve at least a share. However, they want the AP trophy to be completely overlooked in favor of the FWAA trophy for one single season. The voting method was changed because of this outcome, and it ironically cost the Hogs another title in 1965.
Posted by Marty McFrat
Arkansas hell
Member since Feb 2011
14827 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:24 pm to
I havent read anything in this thread except the last few posts and since this took place in 1964 I had to google wtf happened

Taken from Wiki.

quote:

The Associated Press presented the "AP Trophy" to the winner. As such, the University of Alabama qualified as the national champion due to its 10-0-0 regular season record and its #1 finish in the AP poll. The University of Arkansas also had a 10-0-0 regular season in 1964, and finished #2 in the final AP poll. On New Year's Day, the Crimson Tide lost to the #5 ranked Texas Longhorns in the Orange Bowl, to finish the season with a 10-1 record, and the Arkansas Razorbacks defeated the 7th ranked University of Nebraska 10-7 in the Cotton Bowl Classic. Since there were no further polls, however, once-beaten Alabama's non-unanimously awarded national championship was unaffected, despite the fact that Arkansas had beaten Texas during the season.
This post was edited on 5/24/11 at 12:26 pm
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36793 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:26 pm to
The 1978 season was really competitive with 3 outstanding teams and one really fine team, Penn State.

Whereas Southern Cal has a legitimate beef since they beat Alabama head to head, you cannot deny Alabama's AP title considering it came after beating then #1 Penn State. Plus Alabama had gotten hosed in November of that year by the voters.

#4 Nebraska upset #1 Oklahoma 17-14 on the same day #3 Alabama popped #10 LSU 31-10. Remember earlier in the year Alabama beat Nebraska 20-3 in as they say a score "not nearly that close". #2 Penn State jumped to #1. But Nebraska jumped Alabama going from 4 to 2 and Alabama stayed #3. To Joe Paterno's credit he wanted Penn State to play the highest ranked team possible. Had Nebraska beaten Missouri the next week (another team Alabama defeated),Penn State would have faced Nebraksa in the Orange Bowl for the title.

IMO, in 1978 Alabama,Southern Cal and Oklahoma were the best and really hard to separate those three. If one of them wants to say they were #1 that year (Oklahoma got a lot of the 'Dunkel' type awards) that's fine with me.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41361 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:36 pm to
There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.

Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36793 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.

Do you really think you are going to win that argument?


Hold on, there Arnold. Many of your own Hog fans dig their heels in and use all sorts of bizarre,circular logic trying to convince a lot of people here, if not themselves, that Arkansas is the premier athletic program in the SEC and have competed for multiple NC's in football and have a basketball tradition only surpassed by UCLA and Duke.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36999 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:40 pm to
quote:


There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.

Do you really think you are going to win that argument?



are we talking about arkansas or alabama right now?
Posted by Marty McFrat
Arkansas hell
Member since Feb 2011
14827 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Do you really think you are going to win that argument?

I'm not trying to argue anything. That was my first post in this thread and I was just posting what happened since I didnt know and for all to see. But honestly no one can say we didn't deserve a share of that title. Even more so after we won our bowl and Bama lost theirs against a team we already beat. Bama is lucky the polls were after the bowls and Arkansas is lucky enough polls saw us worthy for us to get a share.
This post was edited on 5/24/11 at 12:44 pm
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
41361 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:44 pm to
Fair question. This argument will go round and round all day long if you want it to. Neither side is ever going to give in to the other on the subject no matter what info is presented.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57010 posts
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I havent read anything in this thread except the last few posts and since this took place in 1964 I had to google wtf happened

Taken from Wiki.


Again, since bowl games were not viewed toward the NC hunt, they were viewed more as exibition games back then, except for maybe, just maybe the Rose bowl.

Just because Arky beat UT and Bama lost to UT and Arky won their bowl game, Again, has no change on how the entire nation viewed the NC that year.

If it were the other way around, I would be on your(Ark) side but The AP and the UPI awarded it to Bama

quote:

During the 20th Century, the NCAA had no playoff for the college football teams that would later be described as "Division I-A". The NCAA did recognize a national champion based upon the final results of "wire service" (AP and UPI) polls. The AP poll in 1964 consisted of the votes of 55 sportswriters


as compared to the 5 member comittee of the FWA

quote:

In 1965, the AP's final poll came after the bowl games, an arrangement that became permanent in 1968. UPI followed suit in 1974
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter