Started By
Message
re: It has been been 50 years since our last NC in Football AND
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 am to memphisplaya
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 am to memphisplaya
swamp mongrel
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:13 am to crimson crazy
Well fellas, I'm headed to bed. Y'all have a great night.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:15 am to crimson crazy
Goodnight skid marks
Posted on 5/24/11 at 11:12 am to bamaboy87
Crazy, think this guy really believes half the shite he posts?
Yes, I believe he does believe despite evidence. I would hesitate to believe he likely believes in the Kennedy conspiracy and Bush blew up the levees in NO! ...some people just believe in revisionist theories!
Yes, I believe he does believe despite evidence. I would hesitate to believe he likely believes in the Kennedy conspiracy and Bush blew up the levees in NO! ...some people just believe in revisionist theories!
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:11 pm to RazorRyan
quote:
Having a trophy in a museum won't change how every historical football source views 1964.
So, poll titles don't mean anything now?
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:13 pm to molsusports
quote:
if you get 66 you also have to give back that one in the 70s when you lost at home to USC and still edged them out in one of the polls
Both Alabama and USC were one loss teams in 1978.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:17 pm to CapstoneGrad06
if you have an identical record... and lost heads up (on your home field)... you should not be ranked ahead of that team IMO
USC got screwed on that one
USC got screwed on that one
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:17 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Having a trophy in a museum won't change how every historical football source views 1964.
So, poll titles don't mean anything now?
Wait did he really say every historical source views the 64' title as arky's?
Again, as a few said early on in the thread. Back then, the bowl games were exibition games, not taken as serious as today or a few years later when they did use the bowl games as a national champion qualifier.
Outside of the Arky region who did the national media deem the national champ? Hmmmmm
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:19 pm to molsusports
quote:
if you have an identical record... and lost heads up (on your home field)... you should not be ranked ahead of that team IMO
USC got screwed on that one
Alabama was ranked #1 when #7 USC beat them in September. USC would then lose to an un-ranked Arizona State team in October. Alabama won out. That's the difference in this ordeal.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
that's why it happened... but it should not have happened
the pollsters just made a mistake IMO
when the records are identical you just have to go with the heads up matchup IMO (esp when the home team loses)
the pollsters just made a mistake IMO
when the records are identical you just have to go with the heads up matchup IMO (esp when the home team loses)
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:22 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Wait did he really say every historical source views the 64' title as arky's?
Again, as a few said early on in the thread. Back then, the bowl games were exibition games, not taken as serious as today or a few years later when they did use the bowl games as a national champion qualifier.
Outside of the Arky region who did the national media deem the national champ? Hmmmmm
That's where Hog fans get completely out of whack in this discussion. I don't think most people are saying they don't deserve at least a share. However, they want the AP trophy to be completely overlooked in favor of the FWAA trophy for one single season. The voting method was changed because of this outcome, and it ironically cost the Hogs another title in 1965.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:24 pm to CapstoneGrad06
I havent read anything in this thread except the last few posts and since this took place in 1964 I had to google wtf happened
Taken from Wiki.
Taken from Wiki.
quote:
The Associated Press presented the "AP Trophy" to the winner. As such, the University of Alabama qualified as the national champion due to its 10-0-0 regular season record and its #1 finish in the AP poll. The University of Arkansas also had a 10-0-0 regular season in 1964, and finished #2 in the final AP poll. On New Year's Day, the Crimson Tide lost to the #5 ranked Texas Longhorns in the Orange Bowl, to finish the season with a 10-1 record, and the Arkansas Razorbacks defeated the 7th ranked University of Nebraska 10-7 in the Cotton Bowl Classic. Since there were no further polls, however, once-beaten Alabama's non-unanimously awarded national championship was unaffected, despite the fact that Arkansas had beaten Texas during the season.
This post was edited on 5/24/11 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:26 pm to CapstoneGrad06
The 1978 season was really competitive with 3 outstanding teams and one really fine team, Penn State.
Whereas Southern Cal has a legitimate beef since they beat Alabama head to head, you cannot deny Alabama's AP title considering it came after beating then #1 Penn State. Plus Alabama had gotten hosed in November of that year by the voters.
#4 Nebraska upset #1 Oklahoma 17-14 on the same day #3 Alabama popped #10 LSU 31-10. Remember earlier in the year Alabama beat Nebraska 20-3 in as they say a score "not nearly that close". #2 Penn State jumped to #1. But Nebraska jumped Alabama going from 4 to 2 and Alabama stayed #3. To Joe Paterno's credit he wanted Penn State to play the highest ranked team possible. Had Nebraska beaten Missouri the next week (another team Alabama defeated),Penn State would have faced Nebraksa in the Orange Bowl for the title.
IMO, in 1978 Alabama,Southern Cal and Oklahoma were the best and really hard to separate those three. If one of them wants to say they were #1 that year (Oklahoma got a lot of the 'Dunkel' type awards) that's fine with me.
Whereas Southern Cal has a legitimate beef since they beat Alabama head to head, you cannot deny Alabama's AP title considering it came after beating then #1 Penn State. Plus Alabama had gotten hosed in November of that year by the voters.
#4 Nebraska upset #1 Oklahoma 17-14 on the same day #3 Alabama popped #10 LSU 31-10. Remember earlier in the year Alabama beat Nebraska 20-3 in as they say a score "not nearly that close". #2 Penn State jumped to #1. But Nebraska jumped Alabama going from 4 to 2 and Alabama stayed #3. To Joe Paterno's credit he wanted Penn State to play the highest ranked team possible. Had Nebraska beaten Missouri the next week (another team Alabama defeated),Penn State would have faced Nebraksa in the Orange Bowl for the title.
IMO, in 1978 Alabama,Southern Cal and Oklahoma were the best and really hard to separate those three. If one of them wants to say they were #1 that year (Oklahoma got a lot of the 'Dunkel' type awards) that's fine with me.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:36 pm to Marty McFrat
There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.
Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:38 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.
Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
Hold on, there Arnold. Many of your own Hog fans dig their heels in and use all sorts of bizarre,circular logic trying to convince a lot of people here, if not themselves, that Arkansas is the premier athletic program in the SEC and have competed for multiple NC's in football and have a basketball tradition only surpassed by UCLA and Duke.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:40 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.
Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
are we talking about arkansas or alabama right now?
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:43 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Do you really think you are going to win that argument?
I'm not trying to argue anything. That was my first post in this thread and I was just posting what happened since I didnt know and for all to see. But honestly no one can say we didn't deserve a share of that title. Even more so after we won our bowl and Bama lost theirs against a team we already beat. Bama is lucky the polls were after the bowls and Arkansas is lucky enough polls saw us worthy for us to get a share.
This post was edited on 5/24/11 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:44 pm to molsusports
Fair question. This argument will go round and round all day long if you want it to. Neither side is ever going to give in to the other on the subject no matter what info is presented.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:52 pm to Marty McFrat
quote:
I havent read anything in this thread except the last few posts and since this took place in 1964 I had to google wtf happened
Taken from Wiki.
Again, since bowl games were not viewed toward the NC hunt, they were viewed more as exibition games back then, except for maybe, just maybe the Rose bowl.
Just because Arky beat UT and Bama lost to UT and Arky won their bowl game, Again, has no change on how the entire nation viewed the NC that year.
If it were the other way around, I would be on your(Ark) side but The AP and the UPI awarded it to Bama
quote:
During the 20th Century, the NCAA had no playoff for the college football teams that would later be described as "Division I-A". The NCAA did recognize a national champion based upon the final results of "wire service" (AP and UPI) polls. The AP poll in 1964 consisted of the votes of 55 sportswriters
as compared to the 5 member comittee of the FWA
quote:
In 1965, the AP's final poll came after the bowl games, an arrangement that became permanent in 1968. UPI followed suit in 1974
Popular
Back to top


0





