Started By
Message
re: It has been been 50 years since our last NC in Football AND
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:53 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 5/24/11 at 12:53 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
There is no sense in arguing about NC's with a fan base whose school conjured up mythical titles out of mid air 40+ years after the seasons happened.
The school had nothing to do with the "poll" used to determine national title winners prior to 1936. Helms was a completely separate entity from the University of Alabama SID. Regardless, Rose Bowl winners of the 20s and 30s were considered the "national champion" during that era. I'm sure there are plenty of people who can refer you to the headlines from national papers of the day, which referenced the "wire poll". That being said, I'm not sure why that has anything to do with Alabama 8 poll titles since 1936.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 1:01 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Again, since bowl games were not viewed toward the NC hunt, they were viewed more as exibition games back then, except for maybe, just maybe the Rose bowl. Just because Arky beat UT and Bama lost to UT and Arky won their bowl game, Again, has no change on how the entire nation viewed the NC that year. If it were the other way around, I would be on your(Ark) side but The AP and the UPI awarded it to Bama
Do you see ME trying to argue? read my posts.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 1:04 pm to Marty McFrat
quote:
Do you see ME trying to argue? read my posts
No, and I do agree you guys deserved it. But life is not always fair. I am suprised this thread has made it to 11 pages
Posted on 5/24/11 at 1:13 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
No, and I do agree you guys deserved it. But life is not always fair. I am suprised this thread has made it to 11 pages
I'm not
good bait in the original thread title. by today's standards they should have won in 64... but they didn't because the bowl games weren't considered then
so you line up arky's desire for more respect (esp maybe from a bama team they can't beat) against bama fans who are probably justifiably bashed for claiming more NCs than they really have
all the necessary elements for a long thread in the offseason
Posted on 5/24/11 at 1:17 pm to RazorRyan
quote:
RazorRyan
You should probably just start over.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Posted on 5/24/11 at 1:17 pm to molsusports
quote:
I'm not
good bait in the original thread title. by today's standards they should have won in 64... but they didn't because the bowl games weren't considered then
so you line up arky's desire for more respect (esp maybe from a bama team they can't beat) against bama fans who are probably justifiably bashed for claiming more NCs than they really have
all the necessary elements for a long thread in the offseason
An offseason, perfect storm
Posted on 5/24/11 at 8:15 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
Yes, I believe he does believe despite evidence.
The evidence points to Arkansas sharing the title. It's pretty simple, really.
quote:
Wait did he really say every historical source views the 64' title as arky's?
.
I said every source recognizes Arkansas' claim to the 1964 National Championship, along with Alabama's. It's a co-championship.
quote:
Outside of the Arky region who did the national media deem the national champ?
Patently false statement. The FWAA has no relationship or bias to any region, no less Arkansas' or any other.
quote:
That's where Hog fans get completely out of whack in this discussion. I don't think most people are saying they don't deserve at least a share. However, they want the AP trophy to be completely overlooked in favor of the FWAA trophy for one single season.
I completely agree with this and agree with you. I don't think we have divergent points on this at all.
quote:
Hold on, there Arnold. Many of your own Hog fans dig their heels in and use all sorts of bizarre,circular logic trying to convince a lot of people here, if not themselves, that Arkansas is the premier athletic program in the SEC and have competed for multiple NC's in football and have a basketball tradition only surpassed by UCLA and Duke.
I'm pretty sure you just used a generalization, considering nobody has ever said Arkansas is THE premier program in the SEC, but if you believe Arkansas isn't a strong SEC program, you're guilty of the very thing you're crusading against. LSU was tied with Arkansas for 40 years in football titles and you win two in the BCS era and all of a sudden, you're a premier program? Football fans have very short memories and the fact is, LSU has been quite good this decade. You had nearly 2 decades where the reverse was true.
Also, nobody has said Arkansas basketball program is on Duke's level, but keep in mind until Kansas won its 3rd basketball title this decade, they had been stuck on 2 for nearly 20 years. If Arkansas wins another title with Anderson (quite a good chance to happen), we will be tied with Kansas and will enjoy similar recruiting pipelines. How many NCAA titles would you guess Arizona has won? 2, 3, 4?
They've won 1. Winning 1 is huge.
quote:
as compared to the 5 member comittee of the FWA
FWAA. FIFA. Try as you might, you won't be able to legitimize the FWAA. It's used as a source in multiple national title claims from many preeminent Universities around the country.
quote:
Again, has no change on how the entire nation viewed the NC that year.
Doesn't matter how the nation viewed it, it matters how history views it. History does not agree that only one team was crowned champion in 1964. Every source gives the title to two teams. Alabama and Arkansas.
quote:
but they didn't because the bowl games weren't considered then
The FWAA disagrees and its trophy sits in the Frank Broyles museum, along with 41 others.
quote:
so you line up arky's desire for more respect (esp maybe from a bama team they can't beat)
Sure, more respect, has nothing to do with present day Alabama or Arkansas though.
quote:
No, and I do agree you guys deserved it.
Cool! We'll go with it then.
quote:
You should probably just start over.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
What (the hell) is wrong with you? That's too many emoticons on a good day, let alone one with tornadoes ravaging the plains.
.
Posted on 5/24/11 at 8:52 pm to RazorRyan
quote:
What (the hell)
quote:
RazorRyan
quote:
That's too many emoticons
irony...
Posted on 5/24/11 at 8:54 pm to Arkansasrazorback
By the OP's logic, we are more overdue because it's been 62 years. Sorry Hogs. It ain't happening any time soon.
eta: Y'all will make a Final Four way before the BCS.
eta: Y'all will make a Final Four way before the BCS.
This post was edited on 5/24/11 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 5/24/11 at 9:01 pm to busey
quote:
By the OP's logic
The OP is HawgAlude. Just sayin
Posted on 5/24/11 at 9:02 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
Arkansasrazorback
quote:
irony...
Posted on 5/24/11 at 9:04 pm to RazorRyan
:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Is that enough?
Is that enough?
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News