Started By
Message
re: Is the tide starting to turn on the Tide's chances at a rematch?
Posted on 11/23/11 at 6:41 am to RollTideRockStar
Posted on 11/23/11 at 6:41 am to RollTideRockStar
quote:What a bunch of cry-baby wannabees.
and Bama's kickers just choked. That is all.
Choked? Really?
Choked?
Then why the f*ck didn't Lil'Nick have 'em kick their FGs from the 10 yd line (or even the 36 yd line) like our kicker did? Seems like the thing to do, doesn't it? Move those very average kickers into close range. Why not just take the luck out of it like we did? Why didn't Li'Nick let your kickers attempt anything from inside 40 yds away? Much less ask them to kick 52 yarders into the wind. Oh ....... wait ........ you guys never got close enough to make reasonable FG attempts, so you hoisted up 50yd prayers into the wind and hoped for the best!
Choked?
The only thing that got choked was your offense getting the life strangled out of it everytime it approached the redzone. BTW, that would be the same redzone you penetrated ON JUST ONE PLAY the entire game . . . on your home field.
Choked!
. . . loser
This post was edited on 11/23/11 at 6:43 am
2
Posted on 11/23/11 at 6:42 am to NC_Tigah
And your offense was gangbusters against our d huh? What did you guys have 200 total yards?
Posted on 11/23/11 at 6:44 am to NC_Tigah
boy you too yella to play da mothafrickin tide again after they handled LSU's arse in tuscaloosa?
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:22 am to Elleshoe
quote:
boy you too yella to play da mothafrickin tide again after they handled LSU's arse in tuscaloosa?
The funny thing is, I'd like our chances vs Bama in NO. We did not give them our best shot in T-town . . . broken coverages, redzone inefficiency etc. So IMO, couldn't care less whether we play Bama or OSU or Stanford as long as we get there. I'd guess most LSU folks feel the same.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:26 am to NC_Tigah
It won't be close. Bama was lucky once. Not again.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:26 am to shrevetigertom
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:29 am to Morgus
quote:
A bad analogy since, if Alabama goes to the BCSNCG, they will not have been treated like a wild card team but rather a division winner who got a first round bye. A more pertinent question would be "do we hoot and holler when the NFL division winners with the best record in each conference have to play a playoff game while a non-division winner gets to play the winner of one of these games." That's never happened. If insanity took hold in the NFL and it did, yes there would be hooting and hollering aplenty.
Don't blame Bama because the BCS wanted the two best teams no matter who they are. It's the rules that everyone agreed to before the season started.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:29 am to molsusports
quote:
If OSU beats OU, what we know is ISU > OSU > OU
The transitive case is generally meaningless when discussing any sport. For example, if one were to compare Tulane and Auburn from last year...
Tulane beat Rutgers 17 - 14
Rutgers beat Connecticut 27 - 24
Connecticut beat Vanderbilt 40 - 21
Vanderbilt beat Mississippi 28 - 14
Mississippi is better than Auburn because Mississippi beat Kentucky 42 - 35
while Auburn only beat Kentucky 37 - 34
Therefore, Tulane is better than Auburn in 2010
as shown in 5 rounds by a combined score of 188 - 145.
With enough degrees of separation, you can make that case between ANY 2 teams. Just play the game and remember per NCAA rules, "the team with the highr point total is the winner", regardless of venue, passing or rushing yards, made or missed field goals or how correct or incorrect the ref calls were.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:30 am to BuccWildBammer
quote:
And Trent had more yds than any LSU RB,
then quit. Great 2nd half and overtime for Mr. Heisman.
quote:
and your overrated honey bun was getting owned all game so much so that his punkass got so aggrivated he layed a cheapshot on the REAL DB on the field, you know the one who shut down Randle all night.
that must be why Dre quit on a fake injury
quote:
I'm warning you LSU wants no part of a rematch with Bama
oh NO!!!! He's warning me!!! Your team couldn't make it past the 19 yard line at home. This game will not be close and bumping all of your retard posts afterwards will be hilarious.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:32 am to TT9
quote:
And your offense was gangbusters against our d huh? What did you guys have 200 total yards?
We did get inside the 19 multiple times though. We didn't even throw a deep pass and everyone knows Swagga always quits and gives up at least one long TD if you throw deep. We won't have to deal with crowd noise this time but GayJ will. Good luck with that.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:35 am to TT9
quote:
And your offense was gangbusters against our d huh? What did you guys have 200 total yards?
Oh, the Bama D is legit and incredible.
Fortunately for LSU. Les Miles made SMART decisions and did not panic. He did not ask his players to perform beyond their reasonable ability to execute. He trusted his own defense and was intelligent and relaxed.
Therefore, LSU won the game.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:36 am to Maximus
Funny,didn't see a ball thrown his way all night..
The gayj name is cool though..
The gayj name is cool though..
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:38 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:Bingo!
Oh, the Bama D is legit and incredible.
Fortunately for LSU. Les Miles made SMART decisions and did not panic. He did not ask his players to perform beyond their reasonable ability to execute. He trusted his own defense and was intelligent and relaxed.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:39 am to Schwaaz
quote:
Don't blame Bama because the BCS wanted the two best teams no matter who they are. It's the rules that everyone agreed to before the season started.
We could always have LSU send their 1st and 2nd teams because apparently they have lost to each other during practice and seem to be the only team in the country to beat the other up
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:39 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
A legit and smart response,rare thing round here...
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:55 am to TT9
quote:
A legit and smart response,rare thing round here...
A lot of posts are smart and logical - merely that some fans refuse to accept the logic and stick to their delusion and hence condemn those posts.
In fact there are still fanbases out there , who claim, after losing, that they are indeed the better team - Idiocy, I am sure you will agree - but what can we do
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:55 am to NC_Tigah
Yes I think LSU and bama are the two best teams. No I do not want a rematch as no gumps would if they had won. They had their shot, they lost.
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:56 am to Das Jackal
quote:
Yes I think LSU and bama are the two best teams. No I do not want a rematch as no gumps would if they had won. They had their shot, they lost.
Put want in one hand and the BCS rules in another....... and
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:58 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Then your complaint is with the SEC, not Bama for creating the money grab that is the SECCG
No. My complaint will be with the voters who have it within their power to ensure that no team in that position - as a result of their own inability to prevent it - ever gets to the BCSCG. There is no "complaint" about playing UGA. There is merely the assertion that any team that hasn't made it that far, but could have, not be considered by the voters.
9-6.
This post was edited on 11/23/11 at 8:03 am
Page 9 of 24
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News