Started By
Message
re: Is Ohio State the most underachieving program of all time?
Posted on 10/21/21 at 3:27 pm to themetalreb
Posted on 10/21/21 at 3:27 pm to themetalreb
quote:
Is Ohio State the most underachieving program of all time?
I think we (aggy) make a pretty good argument for holding that title, followed by UGA as a distant #2, but I expect them to be replaced by OSU at the #2 spot after the NC game this year.
1
Posted on 10/21/21 at 3:39 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
How many championships does Ohio State, Texas and Georgia have? That should give you your answer.
They have 4 combined since 1971
Posted on 10/21/21 at 3:41 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
It is not that, it is the fact that OSU has had so many weeks at AP #1 you would think they would have closed the deal more.
However, since you asked, I would put Alabama, USCw and Oklahoma above OSU.
Historically, I think you have to put Notre Dame above Ohio State too
Posted on 10/21/21 at 8:46 pm to lsufball19
Exactly, how did golden domers escape this conversation?
Posted on 10/21/21 at 8:58 pm to themetalreb
Texas A&M
Posted on 10/21/21 at 9:03 pm to namvet6566
quote:
Texas A&M
They are pretty much what they have always been.
Posted on 10/21/21 at 9:34 pm to Windy City
The Sooners were straight up gangsta criminals under Switzer. Buster Rhymes shooting a machine gun off the balcony, Charles Thompson fiasco. Bosworth was the “nice “ guy on the team back then. That’s how bad it was.
Posted on 10/21/21 at 10:16 pm to lsufball19
I don’t think any reasonable UGA fan would say we haven’t underachieved relative to our advantages even if the state and university profile has changed over the last 40 years. Realistically UGA and FL should live in the top 10.
This can be true and still acknowledge that the all or nothing nonsense of considering NC’s the only measure of achievement when for over 100 years they’ve been voted or claimed. Ergo the thought that the 2007 LSU team is more accomplished than the 2004 Auburn team is patently stupid and almost entirely circumstantial.
This can be true and still acknowledge that the all or nothing nonsense of considering NC’s the only measure of achievement when for over 100 years they’ve been voted or claimed. Ergo the thought that the 2007 LSU team is more accomplished than the 2004 Auburn team is patently stupid and almost entirely circumstantial.
Posted on 10/21/21 at 10:56 pm to themetalreb
No, that title would go to UGA!!!!
Posted on 10/22/21 at 12:38 am to VolMarine1371
Underachieving. I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Posted on 10/22/21 at 5:21 am to halfadolla50
Correction:
Ohio State has SIX national titles.
Ohio State has SIX national titles.
Posted on 10/22/21 at 5:29 am to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I think we (aggy) make a pretty good argument for holding that title,
Posted on 10/22/21 at 5:34 am to themetalreb
quote:
With all their built in advantages
Ohio st has built in advantages? I was not aware of the talent growing on buckeye trees in the state of Ohio.
Posted on 10/22/21 at 5:48 am to turnpiketiger
quote:
Ohio st has built in advantages? I was not aware of the talent growing on buckeye trees in the state of Ohio.
Ohio isn't FL, GA, TX, CA, or even LA for talent but it is a good state for HS Talent. They are the only p5 (for now) school in the state. It's not an outlandish comment.
Posted on 10/22/21 at 6:07 am to themetalreb
Alabama is. They way they recruit and with the coaches they have, no excuse not to win every year.
Posted on 10/22/21 at 6:08 am to Pulpwood Patterson
I would say Georgia had underachieved HARD for the past 20 or so years. The team was very different in the 90s.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News